HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / Politics

The New Atheists

133 durable postsStarted 2006-11-12Latest 2006-11-20
#750912Post 41 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[quote=rubyraks;407102]Man I'd love to see those 71 percent live up to it :p :lol:[/quote]

Scary that that's the case in other parts of the world... I think organized religion is a reflection of human nature. So is organized anything, for that matter. It has the potential to be good, it has the potential to be bad. And there will always be some sub-grouping of douchebags who can't compromise and will go out of their way to fuck things up for others. It doesn't matter much if you're talking religion, atheists (don't forget the commies - atheists are no better), government, or the local PTA. You'll see the same ugly sides of humanity anytime someone feels that they are so justified in their course of action that nothing else matters.

#750961Post 42 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

I dont believe in a god, however I find it funny how people who believe in god in this thread are so insecure about their beliefs they don't argue their reasons why they believe in god just like bullshit like this.

[quote=thesightless;406908]aethiests are assholes[/quote]

#750963Post 43 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

its never pro aethiesm , but rather, anti religion. that little darwin thing made me laugh.

#750964Post 44 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

also, playing aethiests into defending the idea as if it were a religion is a great hobby for boring days at the office. sorry but i had to keep busy.

#751130Post 45 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=thesightless;407250]also, playing aethiests into defending the idea as if it were a religion is a great hobby for boring days at the office. sorry but i had to keep busy.[/QUOTE] You see there's the trick the "believers" have learned how to play on the atheists, get the atheists to defend their "belief" that there is no god.

First, it corners the atheists to realize that for as much as they'd like to fight against the concept of belief, to proclaim there is no god is a belief all unto itself.

Second, it's a catch-22, can't prove it one way or the other and they always fall for it.

...which is why at the end of the day, I call myself an agnostic. I don't believe in god, but I can't disprove it either.

#751139Post 46 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

i wonder what i am. i dont follow any particular religion, but i have faith. i do, i beleive that there is something out there, but i have no clue what it is. i just refer to it as god, and dont identify any routines or beleif systems. its more about being good and not doing harm to others and hopefully benifitting. kinda follows the bible line of ''do onto others...". but that is it. im sorry, but i dont think you are going to hell for not attnding a service that is changed every 50 years by us.

#751174Post 47 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

^Good view point.

I also believe in God. I consider myself a Christian. But there are too many people in the world for any one way to be absolute. It takes all kinds. Every religion has a common thread and Sean pointed it out..."Do onto others as you would have them do to you."

#751178Post 48 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

except the jews. (picturing borat's B&B scene)

#751183Post 49 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=thesightless;407442]i wonder what i am. i dont follow any particular religion, but i have faith. i do, i beleive that there is something out there, but i have no clue what it is. i just refer to it as god, and dont identify any routines or beleif systems. its more about being good and not doing harm to others and hopefully benifitting. kinda follows the bible line of ''do onto others...". but that is it. im sorry, but i dont think you are going to hell for not attnding a service that is changed every 50 years by us.[/QUOTE] that's pretty much my philosophy as well...with the exception of the "i beleive that there is something out there".

We're all better off treating each other with respect and truthfully, good things do go around :)

#751203Post 50 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[quote=rubyraks;407491] We're all better off treating each other with respect and truthfully, good things do go around :)[/quote]

Isn't that believing something is out there? I ask in all sincerety...I'm not trying to give you a hard time. :)

#751210Post 51 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

not really, it just means that if im nice to you, you will be nice to me. and those who dont act nice, they get little in return and become lawyers.

#751211Post 52 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

lol..

#751219Post 53 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

I dont believe in the existence of God...or any supreme being. We are born...we live..and we die...thats it. Nothing more, we are much too insignificant in the great scheme of things to believe we are "GODS CREATUREs" Richard Dawkins has made some seriously solid statements. Although I dont believe it should be imposed on anyone. Like religion...or believing in one god over another was pushed over the centuries, this is something that people will eventually realize. Till...then...let them believe whatever they want to.

Religion was created to give man structure in life, and keep man humble. But the truth remains, There is no God.

#751220Post 54 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[quote=JahRasta;407531].

Religion was created to give man structure in life, and keep man humble. But the truth remains, There is no God.[/quote]

that is what drives ppl like CDJ crazy. it isnt the truth, it is merely an opinion. we cannot prove or disprove the theory. im sorry we cant. just playing devils advocate. you will find that more than 90% of humanity beleives in the higher power. but you cant prove them wrong, just as someone like CDJ cannot prove god exists. debate, dont inflame.

#751224Post 55 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=thesightless;407521]not really, it just means that if im nice to you, you will be nice to me. and those who dont act nice, they get little in return and become lawyers.[/QUOTE] hehe :lol:

#751226Post 56 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

Thats true....that is just my opinion. I dont mean to inflame. So I guess in my opinion and Voltaire's opinion...."If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him"

#751230Post 57 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

Who knocked Socialism????

#751235Post 58 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=Lorn;407514][quote=rubyraks;407491] We're all better off treating each other with respect and truthfully, good things do go around :)[/quote]

Isn't that believing something is out there? I ask in all sincerety...I'm not trying to give you a hard time. :)Isn't that believing something is out there? I ask in all sincerety...I'm not trying to give you a hard time. :)[/QUOTE] not a belief in a higher being, just a belief in human philosophy, as Sean so humorously explained. I know that my good nature provides, for the lack of a better word, a karma around me and that is returned in kind. Bad attitudes and people get treated badly in return just the same. It's a feeling we get off of people and our actions are adjusted to that feeling. I've seen it play out too many times.

#751239Post 59 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

Yup Yup! In my opinion, there is no one higher up making good things happen to me...just cuz I was good to others. Thats just the way it works. Just cuz we dont fully understand the human equation, we assign answers to an intangible parent figure from thousands of years ago. Living a life...of...Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Simple...yet very effective.

#751240Post 60 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

Until we get Democracy correct 100%...Theoretical Socialism is STILL the best way to run a nation. ANYONE who plays or enjoys a TEAM sport, should understand what I say.

#751394Post 61 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=rubyraks;407548]not a belief in a higher being, just a belief in human philosophy, as Sean so humorously explained. I know that my good nature provides, for the lack of a better word, a karma around me and that is returned in kind. Bad attitudes and people get treated badly in return just the same. It's a feeling we get off of people and our actions are adjusted to that feeling. I've seen it play out too many times.[/QUOTE]

That is exactly how I live my life, and I'm very comfortable with it.

The fact that i oppose organized religion for various reasons doesn't mean that I deny people the right to it...I just don't like it. I will never push my views on life on someone, in return I expect others to respect my views and leave me to it.

I got most pissed off though at the church when I was in Ghana, and saw people engage in donation contests on sundays for their local church while they couldn't their kids to school. And the local parish wasn't going to help them do that either. Reverends in Nigeria speak to stadiums and load postal bags full of money in the back of an extended Benz for fucks sake (saw footage of that, not on the net but i'll see if i can find some). That is fucked up. That is deceit. That is treachery. One of them preachers had a multi-million mansion, lots of cars, hot chicks (prolly with the A-Z of STD's) surrounding him. Don't tell me religion and the church are helping those people. I'll laugh right in your face.

#751400Post 62 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

^^ Don't take this the wrong way..I tend to be on the opposite of you in my perspectives, but I'm not personally attacking you and I appreciate your thoughts. Just a healthy debate here:

Saying that you know the Truth - i.e., that there is no God...that's quite a loaded statement :D Wouldn't it be more accurate to characterize this as a belief, which you accept with a certain level of faith? ;)

#751404Post 63 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

You mean that there is no God? I think you could characterize any view on life, God or no God as a belief. The difference is that a Darwinist (like me) is always looking to find substantial proof for his views and tries to minimize the influence of blind belief in the formulation of his/her views and ideas.

#751434Post 64 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

I was actually aiming that comment at JahRasta...you snuck in there and posted before I was done! ;) But I actually do agree with your response.

#751439Post 65 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

I agree Miroslav....it is just my opinion.....just my point of view..and saying that there is no God...is a pretty loaded statement. I just like to make decisions based on fact, not mere blind faith.

#751446Post 66 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

I understand what you mean. I just think that ultimately, atheism can begin to look a lot like religion...extremes tend to resemble one another :p

#751511Post 67 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

faith to me is the lack of knowledge. we believe something to be true until we can PROVE it, usually methodically through science. we could go on forever that you cant prove god doesnt exist but the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim (that god exist). i have yet to see one shred of proof. wishing something to be true is not the same as actualy being true(in reality)

i will say this, as an atheist, that i grew up pentecostal, most of my family still are (poor souls,lol) and ive had many great conversations. we can usually agree to disagree. and i told my mom, that when i die and if there is a god, i will tell it that i used the brain he gave me that came to my conclusion. is it such a bad thing to demand evidence so that we dont follow anything blindly? faith is really an insult to my intelligence. and before you say well we all have faith in things like when i turn my ignition, i have faith that it will start. no, i can explain why my car starts, and why it wouldnt, since i have knowledge of this, there is no faith at all. i could go on forever, but we all know that doesnt exist either!

#754224Post 68 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[quote=jay813;407837]faith to me is the lack of knowledge. we believe something to be true until we can PROVE it, usually methodically through science. we could go on forever that you cant prove god doesnt exist but the burden of proof lies with the person making the claim (that god exist). i have yet to see one shred of proof. wishing something to be true is not the same as actualy being true(in reality)

i will say this, as an atheist, that i grew up pentecostal, most of my family still are (poor souls,lol) and ive had many great conversations. we can usually agree to disagree. and i told my mom, that when i die and if there is a god, i will tell it that i used the brain he gave me that came to my conclusion. is it such a bad thing to demand evidence so that we dont follow anything blindly? faith is really an insult to my intelligence. and before you say well we all have faith in things like when i turn my ignition, i have faith that it will start. no, i can explain why my car starts, and why it wouldnt, since i have knowledge of this, there is no faith at all. i could go on forever, but we all know that doesnt exist either![/quote]

That's all fine...but, don't you see that you're making an opinionated claim too (that there is no God)? You can explain why your car starts, but where's your [B]proof[/B] for you claim that there [I]is no God[/I]? And if you don't have proof...then don't you implicitly have faith in your claim? :D

Expressed atheism is as much of a belief and faith exercise as religion.

#754374Post 69 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=Miroslav;407984]That's all fine...but, don't you see that you're making an opinionated claim too (that there is no God)? You can explain why your car starts, but where's your [B]proof[/B] for you claim that there [I]is no God[/I]? And if you don't have proof...then don't you implicitly have faith in your claim? :D

Expressed atheism is as much of a belief and faith exercise as religion.[/QUOTE] You have a point there, but I think there's a pretty big difference between faith in your car starting up and faith in god.

No matter how far you choose to follow the chain of events of humanity and earth and whatever may be used to prove that god exists, at some point you have to make a leap of faith in terms of cause and effect. This isn't necessary when it comes to a car. I could explain it based on empirical evidence...in fact you could watch the chain of events should you choose to.

Where I do agree with you is that to be an atheist is to express a form of faith...which is why I call myself an agnostic. I can't prove it one way or the other, so how could I honestly call myself an atheist...unless I have faith that god doesn't exists?!

#754520Post 70 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

^^ exactly 8) The irony is that the passionate atheist and the passionate religious person actually have some key things in common...

Faith in your car working is certainly different from faith in God. I just also think that faith in your car working is not the same as faith that there [I]is no[/I] God.

#754550Post 71 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

socialism has promise but i dont know the extent to which it could really work out practically in todays day and age...i mean perhaps smaller sligtly isolated countries may be able to make it happen, but it seems impossible... plus there are inherent problmes with socialism even though i am more for it that this shit democracy ideal.... but equal poverty doesnt seem to be the answer...that being said however, i do wish and hope that a system may be devised where we can atleast eliminate the ridiculous shit the poorest of the poor (which is actually like fukin 2/3 of the world) have to deal with.... welfare..... circulation of wealth is answer..not tax....but a reliable consistent 'relatively' fair system of circulating wealth to ensure no one dies of fuked up shit like drinking contaminated water, or hunger and preventable disease...and the hoarding and accumilating needs to stop...but then i mean its all good to say this stuff...but how it would really work im not sure yet....i doubt however that socialism the way it stands would provide the key....

#754552Post 72 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

dammit....quick replied to the page before.....sorry.......you may ignore

#754557Post 73 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

i dont think you are understanding what im trying to say, now everytime i begin these types of conversations, its best to discuss the term of which we are talking about, if we can agree on what the word means then we can move on. if we disagree on definitions then we cant go any further.

i disagree with the word "god". no one has ever really defined to me what that means, theyve tried but i get all sorts of answers that are really subjective to the person, even when the bible tries to explain, it doesnt make sense to me. i also have heard many times that "god" will reveal him/herself to me and then ill understand. these revelations that these people have can be explained through science( you will probably argue that its my belief, perhaps you are right at that point) but since they cant quite explain it, they attribute it to god. i have no belief in the supernatural nor have i experienced anything supernatural to suggest a "higher power".

to me god is no different than lets say, santa clause. when i was a kid, i could not reason like an adult. i believed what i was told. hey there were presents under the tree, it must have been santa! now as we get older and our reasoning skills develop, and some of us will see through the facade ourseves when we catch our parents doing it themselves (empirical evidence) or we are just flat out told, its only then do we realize its a sham and learn to accept it, because its not really a big deal we know were still getting presents. now how are people supposed to react when someone tells you god doesnt exist? this creates many problems as we built our lives around this supposed fact. questions of purpose and morality and immortality come to mind, we were happy with thinking that if i do good, i will live forever in paradise! how do you throw that away? it took me a long time to get to the point i am today. there was no switch in my head that made me atheist from christian. id say its a collection of my personal experiences and everything i have read and learned. i know that everybody is different nor do i expect everyone to come to the same conclusion i do.

there have been hundreds of thousands of gods throughout humanity. i just choose to believe in one less god than you do.

this post is long enough, i wont even go into why i dont agree with the term "faith" either,lol

#754559Post 74 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[quote=malayday;408326]socialism has promise but i dont know the extent to which it could really work out practically in todays day and age...i mean perhaps smaller sligtly isolated countries may be able to make it happen, but it seems impossible... plus there are inherent problmes with socialism even though i am more for it that this shit democracy ideal.... but equal poverty doesnt seem to be the answer...that being said however, i do wish and hope that a system may be devised where we can atleast eliminate the ridiculous shit the poorest of the poor (which is actually like fukin 2/3 of the world) have to deal with.... welfare..... circulation of wealth is answer..not tax....but a reliable consistent 'relatively' fair system of circulating wealth to ensure no one dies of fuked up shit like drinking contaminated water, or hunger and preventable disease...and the hoarding and accumilating needs to stop...but then i mean its all good to say this stuff...but how it would really work im not sure yet....i doubt however that socialism the way it stands would provide the key....[/quote]

Your comments show a keen assessment of the subtler issues, which I do agree with... if only I had the answer!..

#754641Post 75 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=jay813;408333]i dont think you are understanding what im trying to say, now everytime i begin these types of conversations, its best to discuss the term of which we are talking about, if we can agree on what the word means then we can move on. if we disagree on definitions then we cant go any further.

i disagree with the word "god". no one has ever really defined to me what that means, theyve tried but i get all sorts of answers that are really subjective to the person, even when the bible tries to explain, it doesnt make sense to me. i also have heard many times that "god" will reveal him/herself to me and then ill understand. these revelations that these people have can be explained through science( you will probably argue that its my belief, perhaps you are right at that point) but since they cant quite explain it, they attribute it to god. i have no belief in the supernatural nor have i experienced anything supernatural to suggest a "higher power".

to me god is no different than lets say, santa clause. when i was a kid, i could not reason like an adult. i believed what i was told. hey there were presents under the tree, it must have been santa! now as we get older and our reasoning skills develop, and some of us will see through the facade ourseves when we catch our parents doing it themselves (empirical evidence) or we are just flat out told, its only then do we realize its a sham and learn to accept it, because its not really a big deal we know were still getting presents. now how are people supposed to react when someone tells you god doesnt exist? this creates many problems as we built our lives around this supposed fact. questions of purpose and morality and immortality come to mind, we were happy with thinking that if i do good, i will live forever in paradise! how do you throw that away? it took me a long time to get to the point i am today. there was no switch in my head that made me atheist from christian. id say its a collection of my personal experiences and everything i have read and learned. i know that everybody is different nor do i expect everyone to come to the same conclusion i do.

there have been hundreds of thousands of gods throughout humanity. i just choose to believe in one less god than you do.

this post is long enough, i wont even go into why i dont agree with the term "faith" either,lol[/QUOTE]

I for me have for some reason never even believed in a higher power, but then again my parents have always left me free to think of life what I want. All it takes for me to discard the possible existence of a god is looking around, and especially looking at [I]people[/I]. It may sound strange, but seeing how fearful people are in general, how easily they can be influenced, how much they need something to hold on to...or to justify the way they live their life. it just doesn't work for me, but it does for many - and it's not that hard to imagine that religion might also be something grown from the need for explanations for terrible, frightening or strange things that could not be explained from an understanding of natural processes. Heck, imagine a Neanderthal in a cave looking at the lighting in the sky during a heavy storm, hearing the thunder rolling by...we all know what happens, but that guy probably didn't have a clue! So...enter higher powers that can be used to attribute certain inexplicable things to. I cannot prove it, but to me it sounds pretty damn logical (through reasoning and looking at people in an anthropological way) that religion is something that literally evolved from humanity in a quest to find answers or at least get an all-covering explanation.

I think I'll stick to not believing in a god or higher controlling power and simply take the world as it is, and how I experience it.

#754688Post 76 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

i want one of the hindu representations to , quite literally, descend from the heavens. have like a HUGE storm over the middle east, i mena like 40 days of rain, and then some cow/man hyrbid with 10 arms come down from the clouds over jerusalem or mecca, and speak, and have the voice be heard for miles. THAT would be funny.

''you are all wrong, i am god, and im pissed''

lighning bolts, thunder, the whole nine yards. cats and dogs living together.

#754751Post 77 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

That would be awesome.

#754769Post 78 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=Yao;408420]I for me have for some reason never even believed in a higher power, but then again my parents have always left me free to think of life what I want. All it takes for me to discard the possible existence of a god is looking around, and especially looking at [I]people[/I]. It may sound strange, but seeing how fearful people are in general, how easily they can be influenced, how much they need something to hold on to...or to justify the way they live their life. it just doesn't work for me, but it does for many - and it's not that hard to imagine that religion might also be something grown from the need for explanations for terrible, frightening or strange things that could not be explained from an understanding of natural processes. Heck, imagine a Neanderthal in a cave looking at the lighting in the sky during a heavy storm, hearing the thunder rolling by...we all know what happens, but that guy probably didn't have a clue! So...enter higher powers that can be used to attribute certain inexplicable things to. I cannot prove it, but to me it sounds pretty damn logical (through reasoning and looking at people in an anthropological way) that religion is something that literally evolved from humanity in a quest to find answers or at least get an all-covering explanation.

I think I'll stick to not believing in a god or higher controlling power and simply take the world as it is, and how I experience it.[/QUOTE] I'm right on board with all that and the sad thing is if you look at the various religious texts, old bible, new bible, koran and take your choice of others, you could very easily decipher the human intent and psychosis in developing many of the stories, laws, etc. So many of them are so easily attributed to humanity and our own inherent faults and biases that I find it just plain impossible to attribute them to god.

#754773Post 79 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

[QUOTE=malayday;408326]socialism has promise but i dont know the extent to which it could really work out practically in todays day and age...i mean perhaps smaller sligtly isolated countries may be able to make it happen, but it seems impossible... plus there are inherent problmes with socialism even though i am more for it that this shit democracy ideal.... but equal poverty doesnt seem to be the answer...that being said however, i do wish and hope that a system may be devised where we can atleast eliminate the ridiculous shit the poorest of the poor (which is actually like fukin 2/3 of the world) have to deal with.... welfare..... circulation of wealth is answer..not tax....but a reliable consistent 'relatively' fair system of circulating wealth to ensure no one dies of fuked up shit like drinking contaminated water, or hunger and preventable disease...and the hoarding and accumilating needs to stop...but then i mean its all good to say this stuff...but how it would really work im not sure yet....i doubt however that socialism the way it stands would provide the key....[/QUOTE] although you were a little late to post ;) ...I hear you on the socialism front. I'm a firm believer that the best political system I could humbly come up with (based on present political philosophy) is one that is a hybrid of a socialist system and it's sense of fairness and equality and everyone matters philosophy together with the incentives side of a capitalist system. The anything goes mentality of the socialist system (and it's propensity towards laziness and living off the state) and the inherent greed and selfish nature of the capitalist system are both doomed for failure...we need something in between.

#754788Post 80 of 133

Re: The New Atheists

if only that were possible Ruby...both on their own they're self destructive in the end IMO

Log in to reply