HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / Politics

Occupy Portland

94 durable postsStarted 2011-10-08Latest 2011-12-06
#1557131Post 41 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=Illuminate;996063][URL]http://www.zerohedge.com/news/guest-notes-sales-desk-few-thoughts-occupy-wall-street-movement[/URL]

This a bloody fantastic article. Takes many angles and highlights on the relevant prospects.

A part of me sees complete futility of the protests. I've got to refer to a post made by clintlove in a similar thread

It really isn't that hard. Res0 didn't you also mention that you had to change cities leaving family and friends behind for employment? Why does majority believe: go to college, educate yourself, graduate, and you automatically get a job and you are set for life? I think the word 'hardship' is a misunderstanding amidst these protesters. I accept the fact since 1913 we've been fucked, and will continue to do so by these corporations till the end of time.[/QUOTE]

I think stating that housing is not a human right is fucking absurd.

#1557132Post 42 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

or food

#1557133Post 43 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

^Missed that one. Unbelievable.

#1557135Post 44 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[video=youtube;SIHQNDwsdnU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIHQNDwsdnU[/video]

#1557136Post 45 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

reso - watch this when you have a chance... there are 4 parts, but start with part 4: [URL="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/interviews/#top"]http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/interviews/#top

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/tRHtV.png[/IMG][/URL]

#1557140Post 46 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

My apologies, Let me rephrase that and remove points of absurdness: Housing, which you cannot and will never afford is not a human right. Driving a car is not a human right. Having a cell phone is not a human right. Having a TV is not a human right. Unnecessary personal property is most definitely not a human right.

#1557193Post 47 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Who's clamoring that having a tv is a human right? lol

#1557233Post 48 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[video=youtube;4tTTXQf_hbQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tTTXQf_hbQ[/video]

#1557239Post 49 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=floridaorange;996129]I think stating that housing is not a human right is fucking absurd.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;996130]or food[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=floridaorange;996131]^Missed that one. Unbelievable.[/QUOTE]

Before I go on my rant :), I understand that a lot of the protesters are out there because of bail outs and ungodly amounts of wasted government spending. That shit should most definitely stop. However many of them are protesting, holding signs saying what they believe are “human rights”; you’ve seen my list.

Yes all people should have food and shelter, but that doesn't mean it's a human right. You know how many people live in places like Ethiopia or Somalia that are starving to death? Yet their government or fellow citizens aren't giving them food or shelter (or at least not enough of it); and the conditions they live in are fucking abysmal.

The fact that our country’s "poverty" level tends to live in free or assisted housing with air conditioning, electricity, telephones, many have luxuries like cable tv, computers, internet, designer clothing, they receive free money, free monthly credit balances for food, free health care, many drive cars and now they are receiving free cell phones in case of emergencies. The pussification of America is so bad that living like this is considered “poverty”. So very, very sad.

These people protesting on wall street who have way more than the typical poverty level in our county, who claim they can’t find work, who have been receiving free money (unemployment) from the government for years now, have the audacity to tell me, my fellow Americans, and our government what they think “human rights” are? They sit back and say our government and citizens aren’t taking care of them, that we’re not helping, that all these “fat cat” rich people need to give up more hard earned money so they can have even more and not work for it: not EARN it. Try living in Somalia or Ethiopia for a year, then tell me we aren’t being taken care of in the US, then tell me what you think our “human rights” are.

These full clothed, lazy ass people, camping out on the streets, playing on their cell phones and ipads, eating fast food and drinking bottled water, are going tell us that things like food and housing are their “human rights” when they already have these things and much, much more? Fuck that. Stop being a pussy.

I'm all for helping people in need and would never want to see someone starve or be homeless. It's typically the people that are actually starving, eating out of dumpsters and sleeping under card board boxes that don't get shit. Your typical protester would walk right by a true homeless person and not even blink. Then they hold up their little sign and complain. Worthless.

#1557278Post 50 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[video=youtube;ZKzGbgSe8lg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKzGbgSe8lg&feature=player_embedded[/video]

#1557428Post 51 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

lots of presumptions and generalisations in this thread...i'm signing out of this one...divide and conquer is all i say...and by the looks of things the Americans are quite divided.

#1557434Post 52 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Subversion tends to create division:

[URL]http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=356769[/URL]

[quote] A public relations firm closely partnered with the George Soros-funded Tides Foundation represented last week's anti-Wall Street march past millionaires' homes in New York, WND has learned.

Fenton Communications has been behind the public relations strategy of a who's who of far-left causes, organizations and activists, from Soros himself to Health Care for America Now to crafting strategies for MoveOn.org and a litany of anti-war groups.

Fenton, which works closely with Tides, first made its name representing communist dictatorships in the 1980s.

Fenton's founder is tied to President Obama and to a slew of Saul Alinsky-style community organizing groups directly involved in recent U.S. street protests, including in Wisconsin and New York.[/quote]

The same groups continue to surface, constantly, again and again. This soils the efforts of those who are there with good intentions (working within the system, not to destroy it but to reform it, and not by pouring on more socialism). Soreass is happy to wreck entire economies with his currency trading schemes, but expect hell to be rained down upon you by his minions if your net worth is approaching his own.

#1557447Post 53 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Like I was saying: [video=youtube;avG4LgTF0ho]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avG4LgTF0ho[/video]

Not a real good way to get your movement off the ground in MAINSTREAM America. These numbnuts believe they can bring about a commie utopia when it's never been done achieved through peaceful means before. Keep this up and there will be blood in the streets, one way or another.

#1557458Post 54 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

^What exactly does that video have to do with anything?

#1557461Post 55 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=floridaorange;996557]^What exactly does that video have to do with anything?[/QUOTE]

That the protesters want communism...

They should move to Cuba or N. Korea and see what's it's really like. Bet they wouldn't be protesting for it in the streets of America after that.

This is the demise of our "United" States of America.

#1557462Post 56 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=clintlove;996563]That the protesters want communism...[/QUOTE]

Disagree

There are always a handful of nutjobs within any group of people... in this case Vinnie found a video and posted them here.

#1557500Post 57 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Well I meant that particular group of protesters :) Still a pretty large amount of people though. Kinda scary...

#1557645Post 58 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

America sure is heading for a great divide.Communism however, that will never happen. America is too [I]liberated [/I]for communism to even surface. There will and always will be left wing nut cases in any situation, but the majority (the 99% hipsters) I don't believe will support communism.

#1557699Post 59 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Well, the most common analogy is that of cooking a frog alive by slowly increasing the temperature as time progresses. The frog becomes desensitized and disoriented until the point of no return is reached. These 15 communism goals were drafted almost 50 years ago but an alarming number have already come to pass:

[URL]http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm[/URL]

It's difficult to make 1:1 analogies in today's evolved geopolitical climate, but it's still lingers in the back of one's mind as to the republic's destination.

#1557790Post 60 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=floridaorange;996565]Disagree

There are always a handful of nutjobs within any group of people... in this case Vinnie found a video and posted them here.[/QUOTE]

[url]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/06/occupy-wall-street-black-population_n_998722.html[/url]

well, i'm pretty sure they don't want black people there. i think we can agree on that, right?

#1557799Post 61 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=88Mariner;996943][URL]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/06/occupy-wall-street-black-population_n_998722.html[/URL]

well, i'm pretty sure they don't want black people there. i think we can agree on that, right?[/QUOTE]

lololololol

#1557806Post 62 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

I don't see what's funny about that Reso... and the Huffington post is pretty far left as well...

I thought Tea Partiers and Republicans were the racists.

Most people are either a Democrat by design, or a Democrat by deception. That is either they were well aware of the racist history of the Democratic Party and still chose to be Democrat, or they were deceived into thinking that the Democratic Party is a party that sincerely cares about Black people.

History reveals that every piece of racist legislation that was ever passed and every racist terrorist attack that was ever inflicted on African Americans, was initiated by members of the Democratic Party. From the formation of the Democratic Party in 1792 to the Civil Rights movement of 1960's, Congressional records show the Democrat Party passed no specific laws to help Blacks, every law that they introduced into Congress was designed to hurt blacks. The chronicles of history shows that during the past 160 years the Democratic Party legislated Jim Crow laws, Black Codes and a multitude of other laws at the state and federal level to deny African Americans their rights as citizens.

History reveals that the Republican Party was formed in 1854 to abolish slavery and challenge other racist legislative acts initiated by the Democratic Party.

Some called it the Civil War, others called it the War Between the States, but to the African Americans at that time, it was the War Between the Democrats and the Republicans over slavery. The Democrats gave their lives to expand it, Republican gave their lives to ban it.

During the Senate debates on the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, it was revealed that members of the Democratic Party formed many terrorist organizations like the Ku Klux Klan to murder and intimidate African Americans voters. The Ku Klux Klan Act was a bill introduced by a Republican Congress to stop Klan Activities. Senate debates revealed that the Klan was the terrorist arm of the Democratic Party.

History reveals that Democrats lynched, burned, mutilated and murdered thousands of blacks and completely destroyed entire towns and communities occupied by middle class Blacks, including Rosewood, Florida, the Greenwood District in Tulsa Oklahoma, and Wilmington, North Carolina to name a few.

After the Civil War, Democrats murdered several hundred black elected officials (in the South) to regain control of the southern government.

History reveals that it was Thaddeus Stevens, a Radical Republican that introduced legislation to give African Americans the so-called 40 acres and a mule and Democrats overwhelmingly voted against the bill. Today many white Democrats are opposed to paying African Americans trillions of dollars in Reparation Pay, money that should be paid by the Democratic Party.

History reveals that it was Abolitionists and Radical Republicans such as Henry L. Morehouse and General Oliver Howard that started many of the traditional Black colleges, while Democrats fought to keep them closed. Many of our traditional Black colleges are named after white Republicans.

Congressional records show it was Democrats that strongly opposed the passage of the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments. These three Amendments were introduced by Republicans to abolish slavery, give citizenship to all African Americans born in the United States and, give Blacks the right to vote.

Congressional records show that Democrats were opposed to passing the following laws that were introduced by Republicans to achieve civil rights for African Americans:

Civil Rights Act 1866 Reconstruction Act of 1867 Freedman Bureau Extension Act of 1866 Enforcement Act of 1870 Force Act of 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 Civil Rights Act of 1875 Civil Rights Act of 1957 Civil Rights Act of 1960

And during the 60's many Democrats fought hard to defeat the

1964 Civil Rights Act 1965 Voting Rights Acts 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act

Court records show that it was the Democrats that supported the Dred Scott Decision. The decision classified Blacks as property rather than people. It was also the racist Jim Crow practices initiated by Democrats that brought about the two landmark cases of Plessy v Ferguson and Brown v. The Board of Education.

At the turn of the century (1900), Southern Democrats continued to oppress African Americans by placing thousands in hard-core prison labor camps. According to most historians, the prison camps were far worse than slavery. The prisoners were required to work from 10-14 hours a day, six to seven days a week in temperatures that exceeded 100 degrees and in temperatures that fell well below zero. The camps provided free labor for building railroads, mining coal-mines and for draining snake and alligator invested swamps and rivers. Blacks were transported from one project to another in rolling cages similar to the ones used to transfer circus animals. One fourth of the prison populations were children ages 6 to 18. Young Cy Williams age 12, was sentenced to 20 years for stealing a horse that he was too small to ride. Eight-year old Will Evans was sentenced to 2 years of hard labor for taking some change from a store counter and six-year old Mary Gay was sentenced to 30 days for taking a hat. While authorities sent whites to jail for the same offenses, they sent blacks to the prison camps with much longer sentences. Thousands died from malaria, frost bites, heat strokes, shackle poisoning, others were buried alive in collapsing mines, or blown to pieces in tunnel explosions, and still others drowned in swamps or were beaten and shot to death. Every southern black citizen was a potential prisoner for any alleged small offense, including violating evening curfews. Through the prison camp system, southern owners of railroads, mines and farms had an unlimited source of free labor. The black prisoners played a major role the South's economic development. Bryan Stevenson of the Equal Justice Initiative, said, in his opinion, "the prison camps were a new form of slavery, but far more inhumane."

History reveals that it was three white persons that opposed the Democrat's racist practices who started the NAACP.

Dr. Martin Luther King, several Civil Rights leaders and many historians reported that during the first two years of his administration, President John F. Kennedy ignored Dr. King's request for Civil Rights. The chronicles of history reveal that it was only after television coverage of riots and several demonstrations did President Kennedy feel a need to introduce the 1963 Civil Rights Act. At that time, experts believe the nation was headed toward a major race war.

History reveals that it was Democratic Attorney General, Robert Kennedy that approved the secret wire taps on Dr, Martin Luther King Jr., and it was Democratic President Lyndon Johnson that referred to Dr. King as " that nigger preacher." Senator Byrd referred to Dr. King as a "trouble maker" who causes trouble and then runs like a "coward," when trouble breaks out.

Over the strong objections of racist Republican Senator Jessie Helms, Republican President Ronald Reagan, signed into law, a bill to make Dr. Martin Luther King's birthday a national holiday. Several Republican Senators convinced President Reagan this was the right thing to do.

Congressional records show after signing the 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Act and issuing Executive Order 11478, Richard Nixon, a Republican, that started what we know as Affirmative Action.

On December 15, 1994, federal Judge David V. Kenyon issued a court order to the Clinton Administration in the Case of Fairchild v Robert Reich Secretary of Labor (#CV92-5765 Kn). The order demanded that Secretary Reich and the Clinton Administration force 100 west coast shipping companies to develop an Affirmative Action plan to stop discrimination against, African Americans, Hispanics, females and disabled workers. Female employees were being sexually harassed, Hispanics were being denied promotions and training, disabled workers were being laid off, and African Americans were being forced to work in an environment where they had job classifications called " Nigger Jobs." Clinton left office six years later and never complied with the court order. The companies still do not have an Affirmative Action Plan.

President Clinton sent 20, 000 troops to protect the white citizens of Europe's Bosnia, but sent no troops to Africa's Rwanda to protect the black citizens there. Consequently over 800,000 Africans were massacred.

During the 2003 Democratic Primary debates, the Rev. Al Sharpton, said the Democrats take the black vote for granted and treat African Americans like a mistress. They [Democrats} will take us to the dance, but they don't want to take us home to meet mama."

On December 3, 2002, President Clinton spoke to the Democratic Leadership Council in New York regarding the future of the Democratic Party and how they could retake the White House. At no time did he address Civil Rights issues for blacks or doing things to improve the conditions of African Americans. His only reference to Civil Rights was Civil Rights for Gays. His only reference to improving communities was his recommendation to revisit the Marshall Plan to re-build communities in other countries. His entire speech was aired on C-Span.

After exclusively giving the Democrats their votes for the past 25 years, the average African American cannot point to one piece of civil rights legislation sponsored solely by the Democratic Party that was specifically designed to eradicate the unique problems that African Americans face today. Congressional records show that all previous legislation (since 1964) had strong bi-partisan support, even though some Democrats debated and voted against these laws.

After reviewing all of the evidence, many believe America would have never experienced racism to the degree that it has, had not the Democrats promoted it through:

Racist Legislation Terrorist Organizations Negative Media Communications Bias Education Relentless Intimidation And Flawed Adjudication.

The racism established and promoted by members of the Democratic Party affected and infected the entire nation from 1856 with the Dred Scott decision, to the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case. But they never offered or issued an apology.

Today, both parties must remember their past. The Democrats must remember the terrible things they did to Blacks and apologize and the Republicans must remember the terrific things they did for Blacks and re-commit to complete the work that their predecessors started and died for.

#1557807Post 63 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

She mad because not enough black people are represented at the current rallies? Humm...well go get out there and start standing around with signs. And iPods. And iPads. And cellphones.

#1557811Post 64 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=88Mariner;996943][URL]http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/06/occupy-wall-street-black-population_n_998722.html[/URL]

well, i'm pretty sure they don't want black people there. i think we can agree on that, right?[/QUOTE]

"they don't [I][B]want[/B][/I] black people?"

[quote][B]There are a variety of reasons why people of color who have been deeply affected by the economic downturn have not showed up in large numbers in Zuccotti Park[/B], said Andrew Grant-Thomas, deputy director at the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity at Ohio State University. Among other things, the Institute produces research on the role that race plays in shaping the economic condition of individuals and families.[/quote]

#1557848Post 65 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/wQjST.jpg[/IMG]

#1557849Post 66 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[video=youtube;wzBn5X_hsIs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzBn5X_hsIs[/video]

#1557935Post 67 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Wealth redistribution in action, baby: [url]http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/criminal_occupation_oh3CnKANUqYHrGPCaZaLRK#ixzz1b8RhMN5C[/url]

[quote] “Stealing is our biggest problem at the moment,” said Nan Terrie, 18, a kitchen and legal-team volunteer from Fort Lauderdale.

“I had my Mac stolen -- that was like $5,500. Every night, something else is gone. Last night, our entire [kitchen] budget for the day was stolen, so the first thing I had to do was . . . get the message out to our supporters that we needed food!”[/quote] Be careful what you wish for and with whom you associate.

#1558028Post 68 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

This made me lol:

[url]http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-september-29-2011/democracy-on-the-lurch---wall-street-pepper-spray-incident[/url]

#1558177Post 69 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[URL="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/interviews/#top"]http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/interviews/author-michael-lewis/

i[/URL]nteresting coming from a former wall street guy... pay attention to the last few mins of this interview.

#1558287Post 70 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=floridaorange;997390] pay attention to the last few mins of this interview.[/QUOTE]

you cant tell me what to do! ;)

#1558334Post 71 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[B]Real solutions:

  1. Reinstate Glass-Steagall.[/B] America went off track when Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, and Alan Greenspan convinced President Clinton to let investment banks and commercial banks live under one roof. That was wrong. Bring it back and separate them again.

[B]2. Force Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS) and other investment banks to go private. [/B] At the same time that Glass-Steagall was repealed, Goldman and Morgan were going public. They will never say this but it’s obvious their cultures changed when they switched from a private partnership to a public company. Proprietary trading became extremely important. The partners got a lot richer. Yet, the financial world also got a lot less stable. They should go private again.

[B]3. Put some teeth into the Volcker Rule to prevent banks from doing proprietary trading.[/B] The rule is still not defined and lacking in the teeth that Volcker originally wanted. Obama has deferred too long to Geithner on this. It’s time to start letting the old guy call the shots and let the chips fall — just as happened in 1980 when he hiked interest rates. Imagine how the blogosphere would have belly-ached back then had it been around.

[B]4. Announce a plan for housing.[/B] Obama hasn’t said anything about housing because it’s complex and doesn’t lend itself to soundbite answers. But, he cannot continue to say nothing. He’s got to outline what the heck he’s doing here.

[B]5. Bring the Ryan Bill back to the Senate for a vote on China Currency Manipulation.[/B] That famous pinko, commie, hippie scum, hedge fund legend Paul Tudor Jones, [URL="http://dealbreaker.com/2010/10/ten-years-ago-paul-tudor-jones-had-an-acute-case-of-plantar-fasciitis/"]said last year[/URL] that the US has tacked on an extra 1.6% to the unemployment rate due to its non-response to the Chinese intervening in their yuan exchange rate. He supported the Ryan Bill that passed the house “which would allow US companies to file complaints against China’s currency policies with the Commerce Department, and would empower the Department to levy tariffs and countervailing duties on imports from China.” However, the bill never made it to the floor of the Senate for a vote, because the Chamber of Commerce quashed it. Tudor Jones makes that point that, since the Chinese government devalued the yuan by 50% in 1994, over 6 million American manufacturing jobs have been lost and 12 million Chinese manufacturing jobs have been created. Tudor Jones isn’t against free trade but wants fair trade.

[B]6. Shut down ultra-leveraged ETFs.[/B] These instruments serve no use, except for the ETF companies selling them. They also make the market inherently more unstable. Shut ‘em down.

[B]7. Fund the Securities and Exchange Commission.[/B] Most Occupy Wall Street protesters aren’t anti-capitalism, as some on Fox News have said. They want free markets with rules. How can the primary regulator of the markets function without a budget?

[B]8. Push Education, including reforming crushing student debt loads.[/B] Look at the unemployment rates of those with and without college degrees. It’s pretty clear that America needs well-educated people in the future in order to compete against the emerging markets cheap cost of labor. But how are we going to do it? When was the last time you heard a plan on education from the President or any other politician. Old people vote; young people don’t. So education has been ignored and we’ve gotten Medicare Part D instead. There needs to be a plan. That wild-eyed socialist Mark Cuban – who sold his company for $6 billion to Yahoo! (YHOO) – [URL="http://blogmaverick.com/2011/10/14/my-soapbox-advice-to-the-ows-movement-and-then-some/"]has called for[/URL] student debt to be limited to $2,000 by the time they graduate from college. So, all the for-profit colleges like University of Phoenix (APOL) would go bust or have to adapt. Good.

[B]9. Push a transaction tax.[/B] Again, this is Mark [URL="http://blogmaverick.com/2011/10/14/my-soapbox-advice-to-the-ows-movement-and-then-some/"]Cuban’s idea[/URL]: a quarter per share. The financial industry lobby will argue that the trades will go offshore. Cuban counters by saying so will the risk.

[B]10. Make management and directors of banks personally liable for losses. [/B] They do this in Switzerland. Kyle Bass calls it their “give a shit” factor. Why can’t we do it here?

[B]11. Make it transparent which large mutual funds, pension funds, and other passive institutional investors are re-electing lackey boards.[/B] People always ask me: [URL="http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2011/10/11/why-does-america-keep-re-electing-bone-headed-boards-like-hps-and-yahoos/"]how is it that the boards of HP (HPQ) and Yahoo! keep getting reelected each year[/URL]? Let’s make these big passive mutual funds, ETFs, and pension funds accountable. Force them to show how they vote. Let’s put the names of the ones who supported Enron on Milk Carton boxes. And let’s name specific people, not just the big amorphous names.

[B]12. Let any shareholder – of any size – nominate up to 3 seats on a corporate board to be elected by all shareholders.[/B] Only companies can nominate directors – unless you spend $1 million to run a proxy contest. Why shouldn’t any shareholder be able to nominate up to 3 directors to a board each year? After all, the shareholders get the final say on which people get elected. If there 10 spots, allow 13 names on the proxy to be voted on. Trust shareholders to make the right choice.

#1558429Post 72 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

The greed and corruption of bankers (and auto unions – who I notice the occupiers aren’t mad at) was made possible by the greed and corruption of Congress egged on by Obama. Walter Williams had a brilliant insight: why aren’t democrats demonizing Hollywood celebrities or top athletes (who make many times as much money as a bank or any other executive)? Because you demonize those you want to replace. Politicians can’t replace actors or athletes, but liberal politicians are gunning to take over running all the large corporations.

#1558445Post 73 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Because Brad Pitt didn't steal billions of dollars from the citizens of the USA? [IMG]http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/images/smilies/icon16.gif[/IMG]

#1558449Post 74 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;997706]Because Brad Pitt didn't steal billions of dollars from the citizens of the USA? :Who:[/QUOTE]

neither does Shaq :lol:

#1558538Post 75 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

Paul Tudor Jones = one of my idols

#1558885Post 76 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[video=youtube;7-zuSYkabCM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-zuSYkabCM[/video]

:lol:

#1558888Post 77 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

humm

#1558920Post 78 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

he's right

#1559010Post 79 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

We're blowing up.

#1559446Post 80 of 94

Re: Occupy Portland

[IMG]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ih0nmMJSPvA/TqA55_CbSZI/AAAAAAAADCQ/Fvd0jhakDtI/s1600/we-are-the-99.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]http://cache.thisorth.at/00000/00159/157.460x325.jpg[/IMG]

[url]http://www.globalrichlist.com/index.php[/url]

Log in to reply