HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / Politics

sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

189 durable postsStarted 2011-09-11Latest 2011-09-27
#1543754Post 41 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

If it is evidence you want here it is: [url]http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/911investigator/911investigator_1st_ed.pdf[/url]

[url]http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf[/url]

[video=youtube;o1w_6nd0kj4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1w_6nd0kj4[/video]

[video=youtube;z8W-t57xnZg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8W-t57xnZg&feature=related[/video]

I'm not saying this is gospel, but I just rely on this as it is applicable science. Not some report compiled behind closed doors.

#1543758Post 42 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988282]If it is evidence you want here it is: [URL]http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/911investigator/911investigator_1st_ed.pdf[/URL]

[URL="http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf"]http://www2.ae911truth.org/downloads/29_Structural-Civil_Engineers_2009-06-17.pdf [/URL]

[video=youtube;o1w_6nd0kj4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1w_6nd0kj4[/video]

[video=youtube;z8W-t57xnZg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8W-t57xnZg&feature=related[/video]

I'm not saying this is gospel, but I just rely on this as it is applicable science. Not some report compiled behind closed doors.[/QUOTE]

:lol: compiled behind closed doors. tinfoil hats ftw.

#1543759Post 43 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

So in rebuttal, may I ask where would your evidence be? Just wanted to read some of things in which you believe and should start making my tin foil hats ready.

#1543772Post 44 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988288]So in rebuttal, may I ask where would your evidence be? Just wanted to read some of things in which you believe and should start making my tin foil hats ready.[/QUOTE]

here:

[URL="http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/index.cfm"]http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/index.cfm

i[/URL]n before: coverups, payoffs, kickbacks, cia, molten steel, random building collapse for no other reason than thousands of pounds of explosives obviously being snuck in under the noses under hundreds of people, and f-16s not blowing the shit out of aircraft with hundreds of us citizens in it within 20 seconds of planes veering off course. :lol:

#1543773Post 45 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[video=youtube;lESol88wOi0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lESol88wOi0&feature=channel_video_title[/video]

Just another opinion. Same professionals. Same degrees.

#1543774Post 46 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988305][video=youtube;lESol88wOi0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lESol88wOi0&feature=channel_video_title[/video]

Just another opinion. Same professionals. Same degrees.[/QUOTE]

This guy has done more damage to lowering IQ's than about anyone else since all the truthers latch on to his ball sack because he has an architect degree. :roflmao:

I don't give a fuck about random news clippings from people on the street and news reporters. Srsly? If you rely on this and believe it then its just foolishness. Oh wait the people who actually went to the site and actually physically examined evidence must be wrong...Powerpoint and CBS news clippings of Dan Rather saying the word dynamite > science.

My question really is why does this have such an allure to people? Throw all IQ points out the door to believe in something just because you want it to be true?

:lol: This topic has been kicked to death already, I'll stop chiming in...but I'd check out the official report which doesn't use youtube clips and random news clips out of context as it's evidence base.

#1543775Post 47 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[SIZE=2]You may want to listen to this interview with Ilan Shrira from this month, a social psychologist at the University of Florida in Gainsville & author of the paper [U][SIZE=3]“Paranoia, 9/11 and the roots of conspiracy theories,” published in [/SIZE][/U][I][U][SIZE=3]Psychology Today... [/SIZE][/U]

[/I]The interview is from Southern California Public Radio.

Lots of different callers call in and make some pretty good points, I hope everyone can listen.

[COLOR=#00ff00][SIZE=4][B] [URL="http://www.scpr.org/programs/patt-morrison/2011/09/07/20590/conspiracy-theories"]interview

[/URL][/B][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE]

#1543776Post 48 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

^cool I'll check it out.

#1543777Post 49 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

So here's another one of your tin foil nuttas. Remember they all have engineering degrees, similar qualifications and affiliations. [url]http://www.allanstime.com/NIST_Whistleblower_on_911_Cover-Up/14pointspaper.pdf[/url]

#1543778Post 50 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

Well we are going in circles, and will so for another 10 years. So till then. Lets keep believing, and I'll keep polishing my hats.

But question is why how can you believe in NIST reports?

#1543779Post 51 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

^Illuminate, you're a cool person, so I mean no offense by this question, but do you smoke pot... often?

#1543780Post 52 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988310]Well we are going in circles, and will so for another 10 years. So till then. Lets keep believing, and I'll keep polishing my hats.

But question is why how can you believe in NIST reports?[/QUOTE]

Science. Logic. Common sense.

[QUOTE=floridaorange;988311]^Illuminate, you're a cool person, so I mean no offense by this question, but do you smoke pot... often?[/QUOTE]

:lol:

#1543789Post 53 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=floridaorange;988307][SIZE=2]You may want to listen to this interview with Ilan Shrira from this month, a social psychologist at the University of Florida in Gainsville & author of the paper [U][SIZE=3]“Paranoia, 9/11 and the roots of conspiracy theories,” published in [/SIZE][/U][I][U][SIZE=3]Psychology Today... [/SIZE][/U]

[/I]The interview is from Southern California Public Radio.

Lots of different callers call in and make some pretty good points, I hope everyone can listen.

[COLOR=#00ff00][SIZE=4][B] [URL="http://www.scpr.org/programs/patt-morrison/2011/09/07/20590/conspiracy-theories"]interview

[/URL][/B][/SIZE][/COLOR][/SIZE][/QUOTE]

This was a good interview...made some good points.

#1543790Post 54 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988309]So here's another one of your tin foil nuttas. Remember they all have engineering degrees, similar qualifications and affiliations. [URL]http://www.allanstime.com/NIST_Whistleblower_on_911_Cover-Up/14pointspaper.pdf[/URL][/QUOTE]

This is a good looking paper, but the couple page's points are laughable.

1] From section 1: WTC7 Collapse Issue:

[quote] FEMA analyzed the remarkable collapse of WTC building 7, the 47-story skyscraper that, even though it was not hit by a plane, collapsed about seven hours after the second Tower collapse. We certainly agree that FEMA’s best firebased hypothesis “has only a low probability of occurrence.” [COLOR=#ff0000]NIST’s final report on WTC 7 has been long delayed and is eagerly awaited [3]. Apparently it is difficult to fully explain the complete and rapid collapse of WTC 7 with a fire-based hypothesis alone.[/COLOR][/quote]

Note the date on this. 2008. The [URL="http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm"]WTC7 NIST investigation [/URL]in fact came out after this paper, like they state, they are waiting for the report. So smartass remarks really don't have any relevant point.

2] from Withstanding Jet Impact:

[quote] "Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there."

Skilling - a recognized expert in tall buildings - doesn't think a single 200-pound car bomb would topple or do major structural damage to a Trade Center tower. The supporting columns are closely spaced and even if several were disabled, the others would carry the load.

…Although Skilling is not an explosives expert, he says there are people who do know enough about building demolition to bring a structure like the Trade Center down.

[COLOR=#ff0000]"I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it." [6][/COLOR] [/quote]

That citation is from a short Seattle Times newspaper article from 1993!

[URL]http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19930227&slug=1687698[/URL]

[quote] Although Skilling is not an explosives expert, he says there are people who do know enough about building demolition to bring a structure like the Trade Center down.

"I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it."[/quote]

Thats his entire scientific statement right there.

:roflmao:

Comon guys...you can't really fall for an off the cuff quote like this as fact can you? Oh wait.

#1543834Post 55 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

I agree those points are comments rather than proven theories but there are another 11.

As I said I'm not running around claiming it was government cover up where Bush did this and Bush did that. All I was sceptical about was the actual structural failure of the towers nothing more. And it's enlightening to see you may have a valid point. Yes I may have some further reading to do, but until then I still sit on the fence.

#1543835Post 56 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988381]I agree those points are comments rather than proven theories but there are another 11.

As I said I'm not running around claiming it was government cover up where Bush did this and Bush did that. All I was sceptical about was the actual structural failure of the towers nothing more. And it's enlightening to see you may have a valid point. Yes I may have some further reading to do, but until then I still sit on the fence.[/QUOTE]

Cool...honestly I would check out the FAQ page from the NIST site above. It has very good technical details on a lot of the so called theories and their conclusions about them if you want to read more.

#1543837Post 57 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

See it just goes against all you learn at uni. Everything that happened within the towers seemed like it was a world first. and that's where questions arise.

#1543838Post 58 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988385]See it just goes against all you learn at uni. Everything that happened within the towers seemed like it was a world first. and that's where questions arise.[/QUOTE]

It was a world first? Have you ever seen a 110 story building get hit by a half a million pound plane and spew thousands of pounds of jet fuel all over a building before that? :lol:

Also in before any nonsense about a plane hitting the empire state building. the two are in no way physically comparable. :lol:

#1543839Post 59 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;988304]here:

[URL="http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/index.cfm"]http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/index.cfm

i[/URL]n before: coverups, payoffs, kickbacks, cia, molten steel, random building collapse for no other reason than thousands of pounds of explosives obviously being snuck in under the noses under hundreds of people, and f-16s not blowing the shit out of aircraft with hundreds of us citizens in it within 20 seconds of planes veering off course. :lol:[/QUOTE]

lol@.gov

and structural damage doesn't come with a sharp angle cut.

#1543840Post 60 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

Nope.

There's that, but from what you learn about fire safety, structural adequacy, the general strength of steel, concrete and composite materials, blah blah blah...You think 1 [url="http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/djdb.php?id=220"]aeroplane[/url] cannot do this, surely not. Its designed to withstand magnitude earthquakes, 1 plane?

#1543841Post 61 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=PROG;988387]lol@.gov

and structural damage doesn't come with a sharp angle cut.[/QUOTE]

lol and standard lol'ing because it has anyone associated with anyone in power anywhere and therefore is blatantly a lie.

#1543842Post 62 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988388]Nope.

There's that, but from what you learn about fire safety, structural adequacy, the general strength of steel, concrete and composite materials, blah blah blah...You think 1 [URL="http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/djdb.php?id=220"]aeroplane[/URL] cannot do this, surely not. Its designed to withstand magnitude earthquakes, 1 plane?[/QUOTE]

yup it happened.

#1543843Post 63 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

So 2021 then?

#1543844Post 64 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988391]So 2021 then?[/QUOTE]

Whats in 2021?

#1543846Post 65 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

Ohh just another ten years from now. A similar thread may re-appear.

#1543847Post 66 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=Illuminate;988394]Ohh just another ten years from now. A similar thread may re-appear.[/QUOTE]

I'm going to bet some crazy world event will happen before then, and everyone will be wondering how it happened.

#1543858Post 67 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=sakio pod;987509]in the attacks last year!!! I just listened to some evidence about two weeks ago and I can't believe the stuff I heard.

what do some of you think???[/QUOTE]

The government and its partners in crime were behind 9/11. And every one affected should be directing their anger, disgust towards them and nobody else. Everything in between is just a distraction.

Every single person out there, who is defending the terrorist actions of these criminals, should be hanging their heads in shame. It is because of you, which allows these vile creatures to thrive unchallenged in their disastrous and destructive ways.

#1543892Post 68 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

^I'm fine with ending this thread on that note... :lol:

#1543895Post 69 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=dig72;988414]The government and its partners in crime were behind 9/11. And every one affected should be directing their anger, disgust towards them and nobody else. Everything in between is just a distraction.

Every single person out there, who is defending the terrorist actions of these criminals, should be hanging their heads in shame. It is because of you, which allows these vile creatures to thrive unchallenged in their disastrous and destructive ways.[/QUOTE]

There are too many action words in here. I'd recommend diagramming your sentences again and rewriting this.

#1543943Post 70 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=floridaorange;988281]It was our government. /thread

In before chunky writes: "there goes Floridaorange closing a thread." :lol:[/QUOTE]

No res0 closes the threads.

#1543945Post 71 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;988386]It was a world first? Have you ever seen a 110 story building get hit by a half a million pound plane and spew thousands of pounds of jet fuel all over a building before that? :lol: [/QUOTE]

No there have been hundreds if not thousands (even the WTTC 2) of steel framed buildings catching fire. Only building 7 was the only one that fell down as a result.

#1543960Post 72 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

Here's a video rooted in reality.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUURRaa44_8[/url]

[video=youtube;XUURRaa44_8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUURRaa44_8[/video]

#1544080Post 73 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE]The phased approach to the work was closely coordinated and allowed abatement and demolition to be conducted simultaneously. Working down from the roof, the demolition crews removed all loose items from the floors including desks, cabinets, partitions, etc. Once a floor was completed, the abatement crew would then enter and perform abatement of all non friable asbestos containing materials (ACM). The demolition crew would then come back to remove all sheetrock and drop ceiling so that the abatement personnel could come back in to properly abate the friable asbestos materials (mostly pipe insulation). The wrecking personnel then came back to remove all remaining items and expose the building beams which had ACM waterproofing which then needed to be abated. Finally, once all ACM was properly abated, the demolition work crews went back to the top of the building to manually demolish each floor. Demolition crews utilized various hand tools to accomplish the demolition as well as specialized demolition equipment which included skid steers with demolition hammer and bucket attachments and Brokk 90 hydraulic breakers. Material was removed from the building via elevator shaft and debris shoots on the outside of the building. As per NYC rules, Mechanical demolition commenced once the structure had been hand demolished to under two stories in height. R. baker & Son utilized several large 100,000 + hydraulic excavators with demolition attachments (hammers, grapples, pulverizers) to demolish the remaining portions of the main building as well as the two smaller 1 story buildings. Dozers, skid steers and front end loaders were also utilized to facilitate the demolition, sorting and loading efforts. Once the building was demolished to grade, the slabs and foundations of the subfloor of the main building was also demolished. Care had to be taken to not demolish the sidewalls as these concrete structures needed to remain to provide support for surrounding soils (nearby structures or sidewalks could have been undermined if the soils gave way). Once the slab and foundation were removed, geotextile was then installed with a layer of pea gravel. The remaining portion of the subfloor was backfilled and compacted with clean fill materials back to original grade. The one UST and one AST were also demolished and removed from the site. The tanks were properly drained and cleaned prior to excavation or removal. The tanks were then cut up on site utilizing an excavator with shear attachment and then sent offsite for scrap metal recycling. The project was completed in 12 months without incident or injury. About R. Baker & Son All Industrial Services, Inc. R. Baker & Son All Industrial Services is the premier specialized contractor for dismantlement, decommissioning and in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. The veteran owned company has been in business since 1935, has over 100 employees, an exemplary safety record (We have actively participated in 4 projects that received VPP OSHA safety awards) and is financially strong (bonding capabilities over $10 Million). Capabilities include total plant and facility dismantlement, decommissioning, demolition, plant relocations and re-installations as well as and machinery moving, millwright services and onsite concrete crushing. We demolish infrastructures for many reasons. It may be to give way to a better building in terms of design and foundation, or to get rid of structures that block a beautiful view. Whatever practical reasons we have behind that decision to hire a demolition team, it is important that we know the demolition options that are available for us. Here in the area of Tampa Bay, there are five major ways of doing a demolition be it a residential or commercial one. Manual demolition is typically used for small-scaled residential demolition. This is the type of demolition done for single to double story houses. But since people want residential demolition to be done in the soonest time frame possible, manual demolition is usually coupled with another type of demolition which is the mechanical one. As its name suggests, mechanical demolition uses machines such as bulldozers, rams, excavators, and cranes to tear down structures. Aside from being used for residential demolition, this method is also applicable for larger commercial structures that do not exceed ten stories high. For commercial demolition of this sort, demolition teams normally make use of wrecking balls. These are the big metal balls we see in movies. These are swung by large cranes. Another method used for residential or commercial demolition is the process called undermining. Undermining removes the foundational structures found near a building's base. This is a delicate procedure which is more commonly used for commercial rather than residential demolition primarily due to practical reasons. The general rule for demolishing buildings is to choose the simplest method appropriate to bring down the structures. Since mechanical and manual demolition is the more practical method in terms of money, machinery, and manpower for residential demolition, undermining is reserved for commercial demolition. Of course, exemptions are made if we are talking of huge mansions or ranch houses. Another method used for large commercial structures is implosion. This commercial demolition method typically involves a bunch of controlled explosions within a building to cause its collapse from the inside. Explosive materials are tactically placed in areas which when targeted cause the building to weaken and thus cave in. However, due to the potentially high risk involved implosion is usually the last option to be accommodated by demolition teams in Tampa. But if done properly, the actual demolition takes place in just a matter of seconds. It is the careful planning and placing of explosions that takes most of the time. This method requires a great deal of experience and expertise on the part of the team doing the demolition job. The last type of demolition available in Tampa is called deconstruction. This method is also sometimes referred to as green demolition by some contractors in Tampa because it involves saving as much materials as possible from the structure to be demolished so that it can be used elsewhere. Not only does this method lighten the load of landfills in Tampa and nearby areas due to the lessened amount of debris, the materials that are reused and recycled also lessens the amount of raw materials needed to construct another building. The industry of commercial demolition takes the saying of "what goes up must come down" very literally. The demolition business involves the total or selective destruction of buildings and structures to make way for new construction or to clear the land for alternative uses. Building implosions are probably the most dramatic and publicized examples of commercial demolition but they represent just a small fraction of the demolition projects that take place around the world everyday. Bridges, factories, tunnels, stadiums, dams and smokestacks are some of the commercial structures that need the services of demolition companies so they can be removed when it is their time to go. In addition to wrecking or tearing down a building or structure, commercial demolition firms can provide a variety of other services. For example, before a building is destroyed, hazardous material, such as asbestos, must be removed and safely disposed of in the best interest of public health. Also, many commercial buildings contain valuable materials, such as copper, steel or glass, which can be reused or recycled as part of the demolition process. In fact many states and countries have environmental laws and regulations surrounding the classification and disposal of construction debris. With the cost of and scarcity of space in landfills going up, recent years have seen increasing interest in finding creative ways to demolish commercial properties so their contribution to the waste stream can be minimized. In order to accomplish these goals, today's demolition equipment involves much more than just a crane with a wrecking ball. A variety of are used depending on the demolition project requirements. Breakers, crushers, drills, buckets, grapples, shears, scabblers, and sorters are some of the tools you could find on a demolition project, especially those that involve the need for selective dismantling of a building. Each piece of equipment has its own unique role in demolition depending on the material, construction and conditions of the demolition job. For example, a grapple is a tool used in soft demolition that involves the removal of wood, plaster, and bricks, whereas a shear can handle the cutting of pipes, beams and wire. Once material is cut, crushed or dismantled, buckets and grabbers are used to separate, sort and segregate the debris so they can be selectively removed or recycled. As one can imagine imploding a building or structure with explosives to demolish it may not be the first choice due to safety concerns especially in densely populated urban environments. Safety and environmental concerns coupled with the increasing interest in "green technologies" has driven demolition in the direction of what is called deconstruction. Deconstruction is a process of demolition that uses like those listed above for the purpose of selectively dismantling all or part of a structure. Since even deconstructive demolition is not without safety risks for workers, the best of both worlds is found in remote controlled or robotic demolition equipment. Remote controlled demolition equipment allows operators to work at a safe distance from the site of demolition without sacrificing the surgical control needed as part of building deconstruction. The time for demolition comes when the building has lived its age and further existence of that building could be harmful. Building demolition is not an easy process as it may look to the layman. Many appropriate tools, machines and ways have to be used for proper and safe demolition. There are two main types of building demolition, explosive demolitions and non-explosives one. Implosion is the most common example of explosive demolition. Imploding a building with explosives basically involves the collapse of the structure inwards, down to its footprints. Implosion is one of the fastest ways of demolishing the building. The entire process from the point the explosives are triggered and the building collapses takes just few seconds. This technique is used to demolish large structures like, skyscrapers which are closely surrounded by other buildings and any other way may cause harm to those building. However implosion is also one of the most dangerous techniques of demolition. A slightest of an error and the result could be disastrous. Some demolitions have failed and have ended up heavily damaging the surrounding buildings, and sometimes human casualties. The reason is the debris, which flies in the air when the explosion takes place and it can cause heavy damage, if the implosion was improper. Moreover a greater danger is when the implosion takes place and the building doesn't completely collapse, the remaining structure is highly unstable and may contain some undetonated but still armed explosive, thus putting the life of the workers in danger

[/QUOTE]

Nice

#1544182Post 74 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[video=youtube;q_qgVn-Op7Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_qgVn-Op7Q[/video]

#1544207Post 75 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

The reason Resonator is coming off as arrogant, pompous and small minded is as clear as the sky is blue. He's an American.

Americans have a belief and value system that's bred into them from an early age. Any challenge to this belief system ie: Our Government protects us, they keep us safe, America is the good guy etc etc, causes cognitive dissonance. When this happens fear and anxiety take hold which in turn, help kick in the minds psychological defenses. The most primitive psychological defense is, denial. Its easier to deny everything and move on with your life.

If resonator was a sincere and open-minded person he would study the evidence available but he chooses not to. His mind just wont let him. He's not at fault for this. What he is at fault for is taking on the stereotypical American personality of someone who shouts down people who have genuine questions about 9/11, refusal to believe anything other than the "official" story and general pig headedness. He probably truly believes the FBI found one of the hijackers passports 3 blocks from WTC. This would make his statement about the force of the impact, the massive fireball that ensued and the amount of chaos implied seem counterintuitive to the FBIs finding don't you think?

We all have beliefs and ideas don't we? It just seems rather childish and uneducated to challenge people in a way that makes them out to be idiots, especially if they don't share your prophetic wisdom. One of the main reasons 9/11 was such a success for whoever carried it out is because people like Resonator will always be there to continue the lie, albeit, out of good intentions.

#1544208Post 76 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

oh ffs

#1544209Post 77 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[IMG]http://www.designyourway.net/diverse/beerads/Carlsberg---Here-we-go-again.jpg[/IMG]

#1544210Post 78 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=NickMcDuff;988872]The reason Resonator is coming off as arrogant, pompous and small minded is as clear as the sky is blue. He's an American.

Americans have a belief and value system that's bred into them from an early age. Any challenge to this belief system ie: Our Government protects us, they keep us safe, America is the good guy etc etc, causes cognitive dissonance. When this happens fear and anxiety take hold which in turn, help kick in the minds psychological defenses. The most primitive psychological defense is, denial. Its easier to deny everything and move on with your life.

If resonator was a sincere and open-minded person he would study the evidence available but he chooses not to. His mind just wont let him. He's not at fault for this. What he is at fault for is taking on the stereotypical American personality of someone who shouts down people who have genuine questions about 9/11, refusal to believe anything other than the "official" story and general pig headedness. He probably truly believes the FBI found one of the hijackers passports 3 blocks from WTC. This would make his statement about the force of the impact, the massive fireball that ensued and the amount of chaos implied seem counterintuitive to the FBIs finding don't you think?

We all have beliefs and ideas don't we? It just seems rather childish and uneducated to challenge people in a way that makes them out to be idiots, especially if they don't share your prophetic wisdom. One of the main reasons 9/11 was such a success for whoever carried it out is because people like Resonator will always be there to continue the lie, albeit, out of good intentions.[/QUOTE]

haha!

i'd like to call this response the 'i have internet access and i am now an expert' phenomenon. i base my beliefs in common sense. huge fucking airplanes hitting buildings causing them to fall down? yes. many minions scurrying around buildings for days hiding invisible bombs spy vs spy style without anyone knowing and no evidence to the contrary? no.

thanks internet for making a lot of home schooled idiots automatic experts!

#1544211Post 79 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

res0, florida you're both nifty with pics/photoshop etc - what do you make of this ??

[IMG]http://www.channel4.com/news/media/images/articles/2007/06/04_muslims_cctv_35.jpg[/IMG]

#1544212Post 80 of 189

Re: sad day in america, does anyone think the govt played a part???

[QUOTE=bobjuice;988876]res0, florida you're both nifty with pics/photoshop etc - what do you make of this ??

[IMG]http://www.channel4.com/news/media/images/articles/2007/06/04_muslims_cctv_35.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

looks like dudes walking ... who were blamed for bombing the london underground. exciting no? not sure what that has to do with anything though.

Log in to reply