Re: God

[quote=trick12;537304]God is One, no father no son, only one creator could create this universe, if ther were more than one, it would have been over long ago, Jesus is just a prophet sent by his/our creator, to tell us about him and deliver the message so we'll know, the test is to believe or not to belive and bear the consequences...[/quote]

I mean no offense in what I say here, but I must ask: if you had been told a different story when you grew up (like a parallel you), would you have believed that instead of Christianity? Or should I say, wouldn't you have?

Whereas, at least with science, people from the far ends of the world eventually are forced to agree with each other having no common experience other than their interactions with the world, which do not change with who they are.

If you answered yes to my question above, what if the parallel religion also held you in consequence for not having faith, as Christianity or Islam does? Would you not instead say that the parallel religion is the true faith, and others are imitators?

If you say no, there is no justification for your response. [editing for spelling]

Re: God

[URL]http://mrdeity.com/[/URL]

imo

Re: God

[QUOTE=trick12;537304]God is One, no father no son, only one creator could create this universe, if ther were more than one, it would have been over long ago, Jesus is just a prophet sent by his/our creator, to tell us about him and deliver the message so we'll know, the test is to believe or not to belive and bear the consequences...[/QUOTE]

:lol: please don't try to scare me into believing in God because of the consequences. tell me why you believe in him, minus the obvious fact that you don't want to face the consequences

Re: God

^ good point picklemonkey.

Re: God

the beauty of religion is that it is indeed a choice. You do not have to believe if you do not want to. It is your own free will that will believe. Frankly, I do not understand how you could not believe in some God. As a photographer I am shocked by the beauty that is held in life, the complexity of our bodies and this eco-system we live in. You can look at all religions and their premise is exactly the same. Most religions always had one powerful God, it is frankly amazing when you dive deep into human history and start drawing out common factors.

I am not a bible thumper, but I do choose to believe in God. Does that make me a strong person, perhaps because I have an external source I can reach out to, versus the doomsday physical world. I believe, and that is faith. Does that make you a weaker person? No, once again that is choice, how do you know how something feels or is, if you do not believe?

It's equivalent to painting a beautiful picture yet no one can see it.

Re: God

fonud the guy :o: [url]http://www.myspace.com/godthecreater2006[/url]

;)

Re: God

surely with all the donation trays in all the churches in all the world he makes more than $250,000 :p

Re: God

you got it wrong katkich, it's this guy: [URL]http://www.bobsagetisgod.com/[/URL]

[IMG]http://www.bobsagetisgod.com/lordbob.jpg[/IMG]

Re: God

without an objective definition of complexity, how can one come to that conclusion?

Re: God

To say you don't believe in God is like saying that for every action there really isn't an opposite and equal reaction. By this I mean we can definitely see the presense of evil all around us. Look at society. People are losing the minds. If you believe that evil exists in this world you Must believe that a higher being exists.

When you state that science has proven we have been around far longer than 2,000 years, well lets see. You can only rationalize a day or a year in the terms of fatality because that is the one thing you can be certain of. In this I mean man writes of God's existence for 2,000+ years and puts those years in terms that he understands which is a daily or yearly calender.

God is an all knowing everbeing presence who has always been and always will be. In this rationalization it is to difficult to for the human brain to truly understand eternity. We only know things in the terms of years. So what if in the terms of our eternal God, 1,000 years equaled one day and a year was 360,000 years because he knew he had to help us understand his time scale. Taking this is to consideration, can you rationaly say there is no God just because science has proven man has existed for 1000's of years, NO. We do not know god's time table and do not have all the answers. If we had all the answers, why would we need to have faith in a higher being? We would be God.

Secondly, who's to say that the 2000 years isn't really the truth as we understand it to day. If there is a higher power that is righteous and almighty, you must believe in the higher power of evil and gloom. I mean come on one of the brightest scientist of our times said to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This being the case, whose to say that he is not filling the earth with deceit and mockery of our lord to win a few souls his way.

Re: God

[QUOTE=BeachBum;537540]To say you don't believe in God is like saying that for every action there really isn't an opposite and equal reaction. By this I mean we can definitely see the presense of evil all around us. Look at society. People are losing the minds. If you believe that evil exists in this world you Must believe that a higher being exists.[/QUOTE]

:lol: earlier I said I don't believe in Hell or Satan, so I don't see myself contradicting myself?

plus just because evil exists doesn't mean God exists. that's like saying charities exist because Satan exists

Re: God

^^ +1

Invoking Newton's laws of motion in relation to people deciding to behave in "evil" ways really bears no semblance of logic to me. I still propose that the only basis upon which some sort of a supreme force behind existence starts to potentially make sense is when you start to question the notion of free will.

Re: God

again, please no offense to anything that I say; this is a friendly discussion:

[quote=asdf_admin;537456]the beauty of religion is that it is indeed a choice. You do not have to believe if you do not want to. It is your own free will that will believe.[/quote]

correct

[quote]...Frankly, I do not understand how you could not believe in some God. As a photographer I am shocked by the beauty that is held in life, the complexity of our bodies and this eco-system we live in....[/quote]what does god have to do with our transient, incoherent and learned perceptions of beauty? why does god need to exist because we deem something complex? at what point does something cease to be simple and become complex?

[quote]...I do choose to believe in God. Does that make me a strong person, perhaps because I have an external source I can reach out to, versus the[B] doomsday physical world.[/B][/quote]this is an outright misconception. why must the physical world (and all that is considered to be "known") be insufficient to supply meaning? there is something wrong with the belief that the universe is somehow "dead" when we eliminate god from the picture- it's this thought which adds fuel to the desires of people to believe in things they can't see. instead of hope for hope's sake, or good will for good will's sake, it must be in the name of god or because there is something else to give it some kind of external meaning? ridiculous, sorry.

[quote=BeachBum;537540]To say you don't believe in God is like saying that [B]for every action there really isn't an opposite and equal reaction[/B]. [/quote] one of the most common and sadly mistaken equivocations on Newton's third law

[quote]By this I mean we can definitely see the presense of evil all around us. Look at society. People are losing the minds.[B] If you believe that evil exists in this world you Must believe that a higher being exists.[/B][/quote]why? at some point, things people do become evil. it is relative, yes, but this doesn't prevent us from saying it is true. evil is just a blanket term to describe the actions of people that are strongly anti-social or anti-humanitarian. god doesn't enter into it

[quote] When you state that science has proven we have been around far longer than 2,000 years, well lets see. You can only rationalize a day or a year in the terms of fatality because that is the one thing you can be certain of. In this I mean man writes of God's existence for 2,000+ years and puts those years in terms that he understands which is a daily or yearly calender.

God is an all knowing everbeing presence who has always been and always will be. In this rationalization it is to difficult to for the human brain to truly understand eternity. We only know things in the terms of years. So what if in the terms of our eternal God, 1,000 years equaled one day and a year was 360,000 years because he knew he had to help us understand his time scale. Taking this is to consideration, can you rationaly say there is no God just because science has proven man has existed for 1000's of years, NO. We do not know god's time table and do not have all the answers. If we had all the answers, why would we need to have faith in a higher being? We would be God.

Secondly, who's to say that the 2000 years isn't really the truth as we understand it to day. If there is a higher power that is righteous and almighty, you must believe in the higher power of evil and gloom. I mean come on one of the brightest scientist of our times said to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This being the case, whose to say that he is not filling the earth with deceit and mockery of our lord to win a few souls his way.[/quote]i would not say that god is argued for or against with any reference to time- this seems like an answer to a weak argument made in reference to the Bible like "science proves god's not real because we can prove the existence of man before the Bible was written".

the fact remains that if scientists discovered that, if indeed humans were not around for as long as we thought we were, or on the other hand found that we were around [I]far longer[/I] than we thought we were, said scientists would change their descriptions of the world to accommodate these new facts. whereas with religion there is no change, no matter what proof is offered up. it can be reduced to blind opposition to truth

Re: God

[QUOTE]what does god have to do with our transient, incoherent and learned perceptions of beauty? why does god need to exist because we deem something complex? at what point does something cease to be simple and become complex?[/QUOTE]

Life is a beautiful thing, and many things will never be answered or understood. Faith has a great role in answering those blank spots. I would not want to live a life that is full of nothing, void, space. I choose to believe my purpose is for a reason and there is another "life" beyond this one. It is not what I have heard, it is what I have witnessed with my own eyes. I believe the beautiful thing about any religion is that you have to choose to believe, and in doing so you are awarded. Some people will believe when they see it, I believe because I feel it and there could be no other answer for me.

I will conclude with this ... the big bang theory ... sure the universe and everything we know was created, but what force pushed the button? Science will never tell you that answer. Is it possible a higher power pushed the button and said " here is the universe "? Absolutely, I have made my choice and my answer. I will always respect the opposite view or challenge it only strengthens my faith. ;)

[QUOTE]this is an outright misconception. why must the physical world (and all that is considered to be "known") be insufficient to supply meaning? there is something wrong with the belief that the universe is somehow "dead" when we eliminate god from the picture- it's this thought which adds fuel to the desires of people to believe in things they can't see. instead of hope for hope's sake, or good will for good will's sake, it must be in the name of god or because there is something else to give it some kind of external meaning? ridiculous, sorry.[/QUOTE]

here is my premise. someone that does not have faith has one less option in life. There have been countless times in my life where I have took a knee and prayed. It is like meditation. I am able to express myself and ask for help. Someone without faith does not have that. They have their physical world and that is it. I am not saying one is right or one is wrong. That is my Lord's job, not mine. It works for me, it makes me the person I am, and it makes me wake up every morning. If I were stripped of everything physical, there is one thing no one could ever take for me ... my faith.

Re: God

[quote=sammwalk;537733]this is an outright misconception. why must the physical world (and all that is considered to be "known") be insufficient to supply meaning? there is something wrong with the belief that the universe is somehow "dead" when we eliminate god from the picture- it's this thought which adds fuel to the desires of people to believe in things they can't see. instead of hope for hope's sake, or good will for good will's sake, it must be in the name of god or because there is something else to give it some kind of external meaning? ridiculous, sorry.[/quote]

I've often struggled with this one... On one hand, I see what you're saying...but to me it always comes back to this:

How do you attribute "meaning" to something that is purely the result of an inanimate, deterministic scientific process?

As we established earlier, science can't even establish me as a free being; the best science can do is to show me as a [I]finely programmed [U]machine[/U][/I]. And then there's the fact that we don't even know why there [I]is[/I] any science in the first place; why there should be this elaborate deterministic network of cause and effect, probabilities, etc. rather than nothing at all. So, we're here for ultimately no reason and you could well conclude that all of existence itself is irrational and absurd (this all kicks in somewhere [I]before[/I] the big bang).

And now you're going to talk to me about introducing some "meaning" and "hope for hope's sake" into this picture?

Well, I guess you can personally make whatever attributions of meaning you want to the circumstances of your existence...but it seems to me like your attribution of meaning is nothing more than a hallucination or a personal delusion. There is nothing significant about it beyond how it happened to tickle your whim or fancy. The truth is that we're expendable, utilitarian, insignificant. I don't see why we should be "good" to one another or why we should have "hope for hope's sake" beyond maybe some utilitarian/Darwinian premise that maybe we all buy into.

In short, it just seems highly irrational and borderline ridiculous to talk about embracing the notion of existence based purely on cold science and then in the same breath to start making personal statements in relation to one's existence about "meaning", "beautiful", "hope", "love", etc. If it's a godless world, there really is nothing meaningful about you [I]at all[/I].

Re: God

Look guys it's simple.

No God = No after-life = NON-EXISTENCE when we die (or are killed)= Why am I living now??? = To propogate my DNA??? = That's a pathetic reason = might as well kill myself now to prevent further suffering when I get old and get an enlarged prostate OR might as well kill myself now before I turn into a raving schizo and start killing people = SUICIDE = DEATH.

See it's simple.

Re: God

GOD DAMN, you guys put a lot of thought into this thread. :shock:

Re: God

That's the beauty of an intellectual conversation. ;)

Re: God

[quote=fisheye;537926]Look guys it's simple.

No God = No after-life = NON-EXISTENCE when we die (or are killed)= Why am I living now??? = To propogate my DNA??? = That's a pathetic reason = might as well kill myself now to prevent further suffering when I get old and get an enlarged prostate OR might as well kill myself now before I turn into a raving schizo and start killing people = SUICIDE = DEATH.

See it's simple.[/quote] corrected for accuracy.

God = After life = existence = why am i living now? = to get to heaven? = that's a pathetic reason = might as well kill myself now to get to heaven. it's eternal you know. probably should stop wearing my seatbelt. = Suicide = Death.

Re: God

[quote=asdf_admin;537878]Life is a beautiful thing, and many things will never be answered or understood. Faith has a great role in answering those blank spots. I would not want to live a life that is full of nothing, void, space. I choose to believe my purpose is for a reason and there is another "life" beyond this one. It is not what I have heard, it is what I have witnessed with my own eyes. I believe the beautiful thing about any religion is that you have to choose to believe, and in doing so you are awarded. Some people will believe when they see it, I believe because I feel it and there could be no other answer for me.

here is my premise. someone that does not have faith has one less option in life. There have been countless times in my life where I have took a knee and prayed. It is like meditation. I am able to express myself and ask for help. Someone without faith does not have that. They have their physical world and that is it. I am not saying one is right or one is wrong. That is my Lord's job, not mine. It works for me, it makes me the person I am, and it makes me wake up every morning. If I were stripped of everything physical, there is one thing no one could ever take for me ... my faith.[/quote]

This is the best argument for god I've seen on here so far- admitting that it is a personal choice (I would say delusion, and I mean that in the most respectful way possible). But I will say that there is as much spirituality in godlessness as there is in faith- the difference is only where you point your attention.

[quote] I will conclude with this ... the big bang theory ... sure the universe and everything we know was created, but what force pushed the button? Science will never tell you that answer. Is it possible a higher power pushed the button and said " here is the universe "? Absolutely, I have made my choice and my answer. I will always respect the opposite view or challenge it only strengthens my faith. ;) [/quote]

I don't not believe that we can count science out of this one. True, every time we open one door, we are confronted with several others, but this is no reason to doubt the search.

The paradoxical idea of the creation of the universe is most likely bound up in the subtle relationships between time, space, matter, energy, and our still very limited understanding of it. Much like the difficulty in describing and imagining the scientifically proven fact that time is not constant between reference frames, conceptualizing the universe as being infinite in some way (be it by size, age, or dimension) is necessarily going to conflict with our black-and-white view of existence/non-existence. Our ideas of something having size or shape or existence in a particular place at a particular time break down on the sub-atomic level. When we dig even deeper things become very strange and our notions of physical and non-physical begin to break down. Eventually the idea that the universe was "created" will probably be replaced by a much more complicated theory that allows for either "something from nothing" (as we would improperly call it) or else necessary infinite self-justified existence.

When people invoke god as creator of the universe, really that is no different than admitting that we cannot explain why the universe exists, why we cannot understand how something could come from nothing. "well, god made it." But we are now confronted with the question: from whence comes god? The usual response is: "god is infinite" or "god always existed" or "god was self-created". Well, if we are willing to admit that god is infinite, there is no reason for us to doubt that the universe- which we can see and experience and necessarily must exist because we're in it (even if it's all in our minds- something is somewhere)- could be infinite as well. Then if we remove god from this equation, we get the same answers.

Another problem is that we are simply reducing our notion of "god" to "creator of the universe". Even if we allow that such a god exists, there's still nothing to connect it with the god that is benevolent, that answers prayers, that lords over the afterlife, etc.

Re: God

[quote=Miroslav;537901]I've often struggled with this one... On one hand, I see what you're saying...but to me it always comes back to this:

How do you attribute "meaning" to something that is purely the result of an inanimate, deterministic scientific process? [/quote]

First, determinism is not entirely scientifically proven- there are experiments which cast doubt on this idea. But let's not let that get in the way...

[quote] As we established earlier, science can't even establish me as a free being; the best science can do is to show me as a [I]finely programmed [U]machine[/U][/I]. [/quote]True- instead, one's free will is determined by their own perception of it. If you think that you have free will, then you do (and by "think" I mean, "feel", as opposed to one's rational belief which may say otherwise-as you're doing here). There might be problems with this too, but we must reconcile the free-will problem with external influence which escapes our determinism/non-determinism problem above, which is why we can't get hung up on it.

[quote] And then there's the fact that we don't even know why there [I]is[/I] any science in the first place; why there should be this elaborate deterministic network of cause and effect, probabilities, etc. rather than nothing at all. [/quote]We shouldn't get carried away with this at this point- we do exist in some form or another. Let's not get side-tracked with skepticism

[quote]So, we're here for ultimately no reason and you could well conclude that all of existence itself is irrational and absurd (this all kicks in somewhere [I]before[/I] the big bang).[/quote]Again, I don't want to get off on the rationality of the existence of the universe. However, indeed you are correct that we are here for no reason- if we grant that this reason is to fulfill some purpose other than plain cause and effect.

[quote] And now you're going to talk to me about introducing some "meaning" and "hope for hope's sake" into this picture?[/quote]Yes- human endeavors. ;)

[quote] Well, I guess you can personally make whatever attributions of meaning you want to the circumstances of your existence...but it seems to me like your attribution of meaning is nothing more than a hallucination or a personal delusion. There is nothing significant about it beyond how it happened to tickle your whim or fancy. The truth is that we're expendable, utilitarian, insignificant. I don't see why we should be "good" to one another or why we should have "hope for hope's sake" beyond maybe some utilitarian/Darwinian premise that maybe we all buy into.[/quote]Don't equivocate the word "meaning" with "purpose". Things do have meaning to us; however, we have no greater purpose than simple existence (and that hinges on determinism...unlikely as well).

[quote] In short, it just seems highly irrational and borderline ridiculous to talk about embracing the notion of existence based purely on cold science and then in the same breath to start making personal statements in relation to one's existence about "meaning", "beautiful", "hope", "love", etc. If it's a godless world, there really is nothing meaningful about you [I]at all[/I].[/quote]Again, "purposeful" not "meaningful". I just don't see where value judgments like beauty and emotions like hope and love have anything to do with embracing god and rejecting reductionism. Like what I said before about our free will being true because we feel like we have it- this is also sufficient for emotion and symbolic attribution.

Re: God

[quote=fisheye;537926]Look guys it's simple.

No God = No after-life = NON-EXISTENCE when we die (or are killed)= Why am I living now??? = To propogate my DNA??? = That's a pathetic reason = [B]might as well kill myself now to prevent further suffering when I get old and get an enlarged prostate OR might as well kill myself now before I turn into a raving schizo and start killing people[/B] = SUICIDE = DEATH.

See it's simple.[/quote]

The reason we don't do this is because we know that we'll get in trouble and run into a lot of pain. This is very simple and obvious. Morality is more of a formality of our own personal ways to devise systems to avoid getting hurt while simultaneously permitting as much freedom as possible for as many different types of people as possible.

Re: God

[quote=picklemonkey;537433]:lol: please don't try to scare me into believing in God because of the consequences. tell me why you believe in him, minus the obvious fact that you don't want to face the consequences[/quote] Its not scaring its more rewarding, its more of knowing that you have a connection to your creator, I mean no matter what you say or believe you cant deny that u were created by someone else, it takes lots of power to come to this believe and submit to your creator with out seeing him, its the unseen but felt truth, I mean signs are all around us, look at the skies and sea and even the music you hear, we came to find this. I believe in Him because He is there and great, how would I not believe in the One who everything in my past present and future is in his hands, I believe in judgement day I dont think we were created to just live and die, its more than this, and I'd rather meet Him while I know Him, and not just another human that lived his life in this world enjoying its goods, without even a small appreciation to the Provider, I mean would you like that if u had a guest in your house?

Re: God

[quote=trick12;538808]Its not scaring its more rewarding, its more of knowing that you have a connection to your creator, I mean no matter what you say or believe you cant deny that u were created by someone else, it takes lots of power to come to this believe and submit to your creator with out seeing him, its the unseen but felt truth, I mean signs are all around us, look at the skies and sea and even the music you hear, we came to find this. I believe in Him because He is there and great, how would I not believe in the One who everything in my past present and future is in his hands, I believe in judgement day I dont think we were created to just live and die, its more than this, and I'd rather meet Him while I know Him, and not just another human that lived his life in this world enjoying its goods, without even a small appreciation to the Provider, I mean would you like that if u had a guest in your house?[/quote] man you need to broaden your horizon and add some different information in your head and then decide what you believe,... seriously there so many things you havent even thought of. start with anthropology then go to quantum physics - [U]THINK[/U] independetly :idea:

Re: God

[quote=trick12;538808]Its not scaring its more rewarding, its more of knowing that you have a connection to your creator, I mean no matter what you say or believe you cant deny that u were created by someone else, it takes lots of power to come to this believe and submit to your creator with out seeing him, its the unseen but felt truth, I mean signs are all around us, look at the skies and sea and even the music you hear, we came to find this. I believe in Him because He is there and great, how would I not believe in the One who everything in my past present and future is in his hands, I believe in judgement day I dont think we were created to just live and die, its more than this, and I'd rather meet Him while I know Him, and not just another human that lived his life in this world enjoying its goods, without even a small appreciation to the Provider, I mean would you like that if u had a guest in your house?[/quote]

I respect your right to your opinions, but it seems that what you say is 100% emotive and has zero basis as even an attempted logical argument-based discussion. As such, there isn't really anything to...discuss :what

Re: God

^ to paraphrase Miroslav, citing my conversational terrorism handbook, "if you're feeling rather than thinking, then there's no room for rational discussion"

Re: God

[quote=fisheye;537926]Look guys it's simple.

No God = No after-life = NON-EXISTENCE when we die (or are killed)= Why am I living now??? = To propogate my DNA??? = That's a pathetic reason = might as well kill myself now to prevent further suffering when I get old and get an enlarged prostate OR might as well kill myself now before I turn into a raving schizo and start killing people = SUICIDE = DEATH.

See it's simple.[/quote]

Though provoking, well said and thanks for sharing your thoughts, that goes for miroslav as well, because he always brings a lot to the table on these topics!

Re: God

[QUOTE=trick12;538808]Its not scaring its more rewarding, its more of knowing that you have a connection to your creator, I mean no matter what you say or believe you cant deny that u were created by someone else, it takes lots of power to come to this believe and submit to your creator with out seeing him, its the unseen but felt truth, I mean signs are all around us, look at the skies and sea and even the music you hear, we came to find this. I believe in Him because He is there and great, how would I not believe in the One who everything in my past present and future is in his hands, I believe in judgement day I dont think we were created to just live and die, its more than this, and I'd rather meet Him while I know Him, and not just another human that lived his life in this world enjoying its goods, without even a small appreciation to the Provider, I mean would you like that if u had a guest in your house?[/QUOTE]

"proof" is not all around me. you telling me it's my choice to submit myself to an unseen force is your cult's way of saying that there is no proof but I should still believe in it. I would never submit myself to anybody... especially someone who I can't see, talk to, or have any proof of even existing

Re: God

[QUOTE=Miroslav;538875]I respect your right to your opinions, but it seems that what you say is 100% emotive and has zero basis as even an attempted logical argument-based discussion. As such, there isn't really anything to...discuss :what[/QUOTE]

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

:lol:

Re: God

[quote=picklemonkey;538983]"proof" is not all around me. you telling me it's my choice to submit myself to an unseen force is your cult's way of saying that there is no proof but I should still believe in it. I would never submit myself to anybody... especially someone who I can't see, talk to, or have any proof of even existing[/quote]

Bingo.

I am fulling willing to believe in God. I just want him to meet me half way. Stop by and say hi once in a while, I mean, he never calls, he never writes, its like he doesn't exits.

Re: God

:lol: i actually had a 'God' conversation over lunch. same story, different person... "where do you think we go when we die? really? well i'll pray that you go to heaven at your funeral if you die"

Re: God

[I][quote=fisheye]Look guys it's simple.

No God = No after-life = NON-EXISTENCE when we die (or are killed)[/quote]

[/I]Why does a lack of a God mean no after-life? Not sure how those two different concepts are logically connected. Many many philosophies entail after-life without a God so I'm not sure why this is made out to be black / white...

Re: God

[quote=Miroslav;538875]I respect your right to your opinions, but it seems that what you say is 100% emotive and has zero basis as even an attempted logical argument-based discussion. As such, there isn't really anything to...discuss :what[/quote] Well its more of explaining trignometry to someone learning subtraction...there isnt anything to discuss...the signs and proofs are there,,, in physics and chemistry, its not about just beleiving its more of a connection that you feel once you start it, things get clearer and makes more sense signs become more obvious,,,in the beggining or end its a choice that everyone has to make and is responsible for it...so just chill to the next episode...

Re: God

:roflmao:

I've never seen someone use math, physics, and chemistry to explain religion until now. but even after pulling all three into the argument, it still ended with "you can't see it, you just need to believe in it"

:roflmao:

Re: God

[QUOTE=trick12;544987]Well its more of explaining trignometry to someone learning subtraction...there isnt anything to discuss...the signs and proofs are there,,, in physics and chemistry, its not about just beleiving its more of a connection that you feel once you start it, things get clearer and makes more sense signs become more obvious,,,in the beggining or end its a choice that everyone has to make and is responsible for it...so just chill to the next episode...[/QUOTE] if you want to find it and you're looking for it, guess what? you will find it ;)

Doesn't mean it's really there though...

Re: God

[quote=rubyraks;545053]if you want to find it and you're looking for it, guess what? you will find it ;)

Doesn't mean it's really there though...[/quote]

Damn it!! guess i don't believe in god after all. now what to do??

Re: God

I think some of the points people need to say why you should beleive, even if you dont see signs or "proof" is basically faith. Without faith, obviously you wont beleive.

What do non-beleivers think about Miracles? Call it something else, what do you think of someone having cancer and then the cancer dissapearing? What is that if not a miracle? How can one explain it scientifically?.. just luck?

Or are all "miracle stories" simply bogus?

:what

Re: God

coincidence or perhaps timing maybe...the use of the term miracle pretty much presupposes a god and makes a cause and effect connection that simply can't be proved. One may view that as a faithful conclusion.

So if there are fires in the forest raging out of control and then it rains to dampen the fires, does that automatically mean that god had a hand in it or is it just a possible coincidence of the weather patterns?

Just because something can't be explained scientifically, doesn't automatically require the conclusion that god did it. Nature works in mysterious ways sometimes too ;)

Re: God

Well that example is more "understandable" and can easily be a coincidence of "good weather". I wouldnt call something like that a "miracle".. people would start calling a miracle saving $1.00 on frosted flakes on a found coupon!:lol:

Re: God

but your example of cancer is less understandable as a coincidence? Since doctors actually tend to have many holes in their understanding of the science of cancer, how could you be so sure that your example is a better example of god and not just coincidence again?