Re: Bush's $700,000,000,000 Bailout!!!
miroslav, you are saying it wrong way as no one truly seems to understand how this works. that analogy is faulted at its core.
the high roller is a broker in this sense.
tying the banks to the high roller is wrong at intro.
there is no gambling on stocks here. the defaulting loans are not variable in nature. yes, some defult, but by breaking contract.
what essentially happened here, is that the atm(the banking system) where the high roller(the bond securitizers) took his money from, had its bank (the people) take the money out while he was playing at the table, using the atm card as collateral.
there is no gamble here. not at all. the gamble is the risk of default on the loans that were securitized into the bonds that defaulted (less than 1%) and the public ripped the footing away from the banks because of stupidity, and media disambiguities
again to give a better analogy... remember the savings and loans failures so greatly presented in "its a wonderful life'? well, instead of running to the local S&L, we ran to the market. and instead of taking it from the safe , we took it from the stock. the stock was/is the safe when you operate on a global scale. both irrational movements based on the lack of understanding of the financial system at the time. the money is in the homes that are collateralized against the loans. technically we could have seized all the homes, but foreclosure laws combined with simple human decency prevent that. if every bank seized every home tied to a defaulted loan, we would be putting a lot of people on the street we didnt have to.(keep in mind the scale: roughly 200 million people owning and/or living in homes tied to defaulting loans, and defaulting does not mean stop payment, it means late or one missed)
frankly, these analogies to a "high rolling gambler" are so off base and dead wrong at their basis it is confusing people. only it seems that the stupid people are forcing this into the ears of the people who are even more stupid.
the dumbest part about it all, is those opinions that are saying "fuck em" are the same people who bitch about the wars, well frankly, the failure of the financial system will lead to a war that no one outside of the living survivors of world war 1 and 2 have seen. and honestly, it will be even worse, because along with the failure of the financial systems, the commoditeis (read:food, power, water, livestock) will fail too and become the core of the reason for war.