Re: kerry, yet again....
Here's what I find interesting about this story, Kerry actually had a point that while we continue to fight this war in Iraq, we keep lowering further and further down the requirements to be a soldier (but if you're gay, you're still out :roll: ). Is there a law of dimishing returns to this policy? Would we not eventually reach a point where we're doing more harm than help to the war by lowering these requirements? Could they not be part of the reason for the Abu Ghraib disaster?
So I ask, where he truly has a point to make, how could he make it without offending the troops? This unfortunately is an issue that really does need to be discussed in this country, but any mention of it brings the usual backlash of claims that saying such things is not supporting the troops or at least insulting to them.
Is it fair that we've created a class of soldiers who would be defined by all other educational evaluations as mentally handicapped (or whatever the hell the politically correct way of saying retarded is today :roll: )?
These soldiers are not up to par, by no fault of their own, and all too often becoming a soldier nowadays is a way they could better find themselves as being a service to society (cause truthfully, not many others would give them a chance). Does that make any sense or is that fair in any respect? These are the people we should be protecting cause they can't protect themselves, at least not as well as many of us could protect ourselves, yet we throw them into the most life-threatening situations. Pathetic :(