Re: Why do people hate the USA
[quote=thesightless]not really, but like non-US people saying we are fooled by our media, this isnt the only country. media all raound the world maked things look different than they are. lots of misconceptions about america and its government.[/quote]True, that's the difference between perception and reality. However, you can't deny that there's a huge difference between US journalism and European journalism in terms of integrity. In Europe we have less competition between networks and the news isn't really a unique selling point. Whereas in the US networks have to be the first to report and event and/or get the most dramatic footage using the most dramatic presentation of facts. I think you know where I'm going with this in terms of accuracy of facts and journalistic integrity.
Apart from that, the Bush administration used the power of the media extremely well in the aftermath of 9/11 and during the invasion of Iraq. It's only quite recently that US media started to critisize the government instead of glorifying Bush (ok, that's maybe an overstatement, but you know what I mean).
[quote]ppl call our leaders tyrants and whatnot, however, this country implemented term limits to prevent ppl like bush and clinton from taking control. (i used the last 2 presidents simply because they both served two terms.)[/quote]Bush is called a tyrant because of many reasons and none of them have anything to do with terms. I mean, isn't it obvious a democratic country takes measures to prevent it from being turned into a totalitarian regime? Splendid ideas like the Patriot Act, depriving citizens of civil liberties and privacy and the cesspool of lies to justify the invasion of Iraq are things that make me call Bush a tyrant and whatnot...
[quote]people say we install governments. show me one. every time we became involved, we never took land, or took control. usually we got rid of ppl like hussien and that guy from somalia, and not to mention slobodan. (read that as people who kill thier own people over politcal or religous differences) and after thier removals, we have done our best to aid in the election of a government that represents the people, not the guys who have the most guns or economic advantage.[/quote]I won't go as far as to say the US really has literally installed governments/taken land/control in the past, but when I say for instance "Noriega" and "Mobutu", you can fill in the blanks yourself I think.
The US did and does (try to) influence (inter)national politics by sponsoring leaders in strategic spots. You named Saddam as an example. Well, during the war between Iraq and Iran the US provided military training, weapons and what not in order for him to stop the expansion of Iran. But when Saddam went rogue, he had to go.
As for Milosovic... Well, the US didn't remove him from power, NATO did. Moreover, it wasn't the initiative of the US to start bombing the crap out of the Serbs, it was Europe which initiated the mobilisation of NATO.
[quote]we dont have nationalized healthcare or insurance simply because of two reasons.
- we are a capitalism based economy. which obviously works, we are essentially the youngest official nation outside of post- USSR, yet our economy works.
- we have so many iliegal immigrants within the US that nationalizing anything wouldnt work, the funding isnt there when you have to cater to 800 million ppl, and only 600 million are paying for it.[/quote]Welcome to Belgium. We have one of the best national health care systems in the world...
- despite of the fact that we are a "capitalistic" country (I admit, with socialist influences), despite of the fact that our little export based shit economy works and despite of the fact that we're a younger nation than the US (in fact, the US constitution served as a basis for our constitution).
- despite of the fact that the active population who pays for the system is smaller than the segment of the population getting a pension and requiring more medical care. And that balance problem will only increase in the future. Nevertheless, it will keep existing since it's so fundamental to the overall wellfare that we don't mind working longer and or paying more taxes to keep the system viable.
Btw, what do illegal immigrants have to do with the US not having nationalized healthcare? Do you think we grant the same benefits our citizens get to illegal immigrants? I wonder if there's a country which does do that in fact.
[quote]add in the fact that art majors are talking about governmental operations, economics, and large scale social services,..... well. its like me trying to talk about open heart surgury. i just shouldnt. learn about the topics before you simply express an opinion. i never want to hear someone who opted to study philosophy talk about the national domestic policy.[/quote]What about former actors? :p
[quote]EDIT IN
ADD IN the fact that the general ideas that the english settlers brought here and implemented are used by every leading nation thoughout the world. if it werent for those guys, we would have had a much longer rule of fuedal society and church run government.[/quote]Excuse me? The English settlers??? Boy, I should really read my history books again: I thought the general principles were imported from the French Revolution. So Libby is in fact a present from the Britons too then? Uhm, I feel so misinformed all of a sudden.
As for your remark about our fundi friends... Completely right about that, but I'd like to add it has nothing to do with the Islam. Just read up on how Ataturk transformed Turkey and you'll know it's possible for a muslim country to be a "modern democracy".
Jeeeeez, this is getting way too deep for GYY imo :roll: