Re: fundacion is boring.
[quote=chemicalbeavis]what "shitty vocals" are you referring to Michael? surely not the Beanfield track? a quality vocal if ever i heard one.....[/quote]
Sorry, ---I guess its just me. I'm not saying its a bad track,---I love the track now that I am giving it another listen. I guess its just a combination of 1.) if I were a dj, that particular vocal wouldn't fit anywhere into what I am doing right now within my own style (the song would, just not the overlaying vocal), so that's just my bias--I'm a picky bastard, sorry!! Naturally, I'm my own favorite DJ in the world, so my presuppositions and preferences are what they are. --but more importantly-- 2. Its not that its a bad track, its just that if you played that track out of context, I would never guess in a million years that Sasha would be the one dropping it, especially on a "GU" cd---in my opinion, it seemed out of character for him. To me, it doesn't sound like a Sasha track, where on Involver, he did something different, had great vocals, and still managed to keep the 'Sasha' sound. I guess that's all. Please don't get me wrong though, Sasha has been, and for the foreseeable future is my pick for best DJ in the world hands down. That is until I come around!!!! :lol: