[URL]http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/[/URL]
[ms] · Est. May 2002
Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...
One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.
WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
O'Commie proving his hypocrisy yet again. Oh well, what's a lying scumbag puppet to do?
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
also stop saying scumbag.
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
the alleged treatment he is receiving right now is pretty appalling. i am sure the gov't is using him as a scapegoat to deter anyone else from leaking any private gov't docs. he needs to be put on trial asap or released. none of this enemy combatant limbo type crap. very bad.
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
at first, i thought this was a thread about...
but then i was like...
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;936516]also stop saying scumbag.[/QUOTE] I'll say what I damn well please, and do tell me where I've used scumbag before this post. I think you've got me confused with dig72, and I'll just add you to ignore if you're going to uselessly nitpick.
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;936516]also stop saying scumbag.[/QUOTE]
I dunno why, but I lol'd.
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
Especially "funny" since he's not even keeping track of who's repeatedly saying what. I implore you both...pull up my litany of posts (outside of this thread) using the term, or kindly disengage.
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
[QUOTE=vinnie97;936657] I think you've got me confused with dig72.[/QUOTE]
This is true.
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
[QUOTE=vinnie97;936657]I'll say what I damn well please, and do tell me where I've used scumbag before this post. I think you've got me confused with dig72, and I'll just add you to ignore if you're going to uselessly nitpick.[/QUOTE]
Is it not surprising?
Example post template:
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
Welcome to ignore.
PS. That was just a NICKNAME I've afforded our usurper, the thread is merely about his corruption and political self-enrichment...I'm not gonna' apologize because it rubs you the wrong way.
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
It's Obama's first year in office... doncha think it's too soon to be calling him Communist? Like you or anyone you know could do a better job as president? :lol: f*cking laughable
Re: WH forces P.J. Crowley to resign for condemning abuse of Manning
First year? What kind of moronic time warp did you just undertake? Why would I want to wait for him to destroy the country before speaking out, and what does that have to do with MY ability to run for and fulfill the office of the President. I love it. Basically, using your argument, if one can't fulfill the role (which 0bama was clearly unqualified to do), one has no room to speak out against one of the most corrupt administrations in history. THAT is laughable.
Let me dedicate this tune to you to underscore my mood at the moment:
[video=youtube;KYky8FRtQPY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYky8FRtQPY[/video]