Woke up this morning watching this on TV. His recognition and responses seem sound...

[IMG]http://imgur.com/i0pLI.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Presidental News Conference

"a lot of people want to be mad at me, and the democrat-controlled congress we've had for years now. but it was that other guy we should be pointing fingers at.'

lolfail.

this guy is such a tard.

Re: Presidental News Conference

ahahah yeah had soem tough times with questions and seemed to deflect :lol:

his whole crap he dished out on education is wack; it could have been planned better. shit, i cannot even get the classes i need because of budget cuts. my college is critically impacted at the moment and it just fucking blows man.

Re: Presidental News Conference

Political nonsense for $1000 Alex-

Q: "Politicians speaking"

A: "What are things i don't give a shit about anymore"

"Correct!!" ..."We would have accepted 'It's all bullshit' as well"

Re: Presidental News Conference

Like it or not comrades, Obama is one smart mother-fucker, far from being anywhere categorically close to being a "tard."

Re: Presidental News Conference

[QUOTE=floridaorange;889528]Like it or not comrades, Obama is one smart mother-fucker, far from being anywhere categorically close to being a "tard."[/QUOTE]

yeah i don't think he's a tard. you don't get to be president of harvard law review by being a tard.

i'm just done with [U]all[/U] of them and anything they have to say. it doesn't matter what kind of chandelier you put in your house if the foundation is cracked and sinking. but HEYO!! let's keep buying new furniture and appliances and pretty paintings for the house, maybe even a big change like new hardwood flooring throughout, oh won't that be pretty and glossy!!!

Re: Presidental News Conference

To those of you fine folks who think we should have never gone to war after 9/11, what do you think our response should have been instead?

Question 2, if the terrorists could have killed 300,000 instead of 3,000 people on 9/11 do you think they would have?

Re: Presidental News Conference

[QUOTE=floridaorange;889558] Question 2, if the terrorists could have killed 300,000 instead of 3,000 people on 9/11 do you think they would have?[/QUOTE]

Seem to remember there wasn't enough deaths the first time round to pass the patriot act. 300,000 would of been like using a sledge hammer to crack a walnut.

Re: Presidental News Conference

huh?

The [B]USA PATRIOT Act[/B] (commonly known as the "Patriot Act") is an [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Congress"]Act of the U.S. Congress[/URL] and signed into law by [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush"]President George W. Bush[/URL] on October 26, 2001

Re: Presidental News Conference

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;889761]huh?

The [B]USA PATRIOT Act[/B] (commonly known as the "Patriot Act") is an [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_Congress"]Act of the U.S. Congress[/URL] and signed into law by [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush"]President George W. Bush[/URL] on October 26, 2001[/QUOTE]

Yes we know this! Your point being:what

Hey Res0 are you going to tell us what your job is? Or are you going to run off with your tail between your legs?

Re: Presidental News Conference

im just pointing out when you're wrong, thats all.

Re: Presidental News Conference

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;889763]im just pointing out when you're wrong, thats all.[/QUOTE]

Hey Res0 you been licking windows again. You posted a link stating I'm right. Think about it----------------------- See Told Ya

Re: Presidental News Conference

maybe our whole issue here is lack of understanding English...

[quote]Seem to remember there [COLOR=red][B]wasn't [/B][/COLOR]enough deaths the first time round to pass the patriot act[/quote]

The bill was passed in Oct 01. Thats all I'm pointing out.

Re: Presidental News Conference

edit:nm, wrong one

Re: Presidental News Conference

[QUOTE]Question 2, if the terrorists could have killed 300,000 instead of 3,000 people on 9/11 do you think they would have? [/QUOTE]

nope, and they could have.

just aimed those 4 jets at any 4 sunday nfl football games and you would of gotten 150k+

the pentagon guy would of just flown straight into the unreinforced part of the building instead of doing some hardly believeable bs turn and hitting the reinforced part....duh, planning for 8 years and you still dont know where the top brass offices are, and hit the accountants instead?

frickin masterminds i tell yeah.

Re: Presidental News Conference

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;889775]

The bill was passed in Oct 01. Thats all I'm pointing out.[/QUOTE]

Yeah the bill wan't passed the first time around. It was passed the second time around

Re: Presidental News Conference

[QUOTE=floridaorange;889558]To those of you fine folks who think we should have never gone to war after 9/11, what do you think our response should have been instead?

Question 2, if the terrorists could have killed 300,000 instead of 3,000 people on 9/11 do you think they would have?[/QUOTE]

You should have gone after those responsible and not attack and destroy nations that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11.

This is not only rational but also the right thing to do. But seeking those responsible wasn't on the agenda at all. Instead the traitors who reside in the white house had other ideas.

The invasion of Iraq was in the making way before the events of 9/11. This is fact and anyone disputing this known fact, needs to go see a doctor and get their heads checked.

Your second question can't really be answered with any real certainty. I mean were the attacks solely delivered in a way for maximum civilian casualties or was it simply to terrorise a nation as a whole?

Who really knows?

Re: Presidental News Conference

They actually did this while we were all awake and have gotten away with it.

Is it a dream or did this really happen?

[URL="http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/09/the-%E2%80%9Cright-thing%E2%80%9D-in-iraq/"]http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/09/the-%E2%80%9Cright-thing%E2%80%9D-in-iraq/[/URL]

Right response?