Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=runningman;888709]oh Reso won't point out anything. He never does. Like he never admits he is wrong. He just won't post in this thread anymore.[/QUOTE]

I like the way you call people pussy's and you get a ban, other memeber call people cunts and no one says a thing

Re: Iran's Reactor

I was going to bring that up but I was worried about reprocutions...

[IMG]http://bezouro.blogs.sapo.pt/arquivo/mao-tse-tung.jpg[/IMG]

Re: Iran's Reactor

stirring up all the anti usa and Israel rhetoric in here duh.

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=chunky;888712]I like the way you call people pussy's and you get a ban, other memeber call people cunts and no one says a thing[/QUOTE]

there's a difference in delivery.

trick12, you mad and butt hurt? you'd be a complete tool fool and a push-over to take things to heart, and way too seriously; it's the internet dude... give us a break:roflmao:

image macros mean relatively nothing; cos' really, it's all just for fun (ie. JJ "Just Joking"). everyone knows that unwritten law. get real :roll:

fighting and tattling on the net is like...

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;888724]stirring up all the anti usa and Israel rhetoric in here duh.[/QUOTE]

A politics forum would be a little pointless if the biggest political events in the world were not up for discussion no?

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=bobjuice;888731]A politics forum would be a little pointless if the biggest political events in the world were not up for discussion no?[/QUOTE] this is true...

Re: Iran's Reactor

dude, its the respect that makes a real man, and theres a thin line between joking and insulting and only a real man would understand this and avoid it even if your behind a screen on the internet it still shows what kinda person u are. if ur not mature enough to carry on a discussion without initiating insult then just dont.

am i mad? Not really, i can care less, but chunky does have a hell of a point tho and i do respect him for that and i would have felt the same way if it had happened to anyone else. so peace out

Re: Iran's Reactor

oh do not ever talk to me about respect, buddy. please. you're vain assumptions, based on the temporal premises of posting on msg boards are inconclusive; "flying your real colors" is now apparent. and a real man treads carefully, fearing nothing; respect is giving unconditionally. personalities just get in the way of everything. we're here to learn everyday life lessons in dauntless humility; this reconciles with integration for the general good; and above all that, the exercises of wise discernment/discrimination with observations. can't we keep it fun within the boundaries of common sense, and quality fun? i apologize if i've hurt your emotions. let's go observe your personalty, avarice and pride, and you'll see it's all good and fun, yet, assimilated with misappropriations - slave to extreme idealism. let it be known, that my intention is never to insult ( but spark friendly squabble -- giving others a dosage of kind, hard times); and if you find yourself hurt, i will cease to array my force in your direction, and apologize. take it ez and don't let it get to you. godspeed.

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;888786] let it be known, that my intention is never to insult ( but spark friendly squabble -- giving others a dosage of kind, hard times); and if you find yourself hurt, i will cease to array my force in your direction, and apologize. take it ez and don't let it get to you. godspeed.[/QUOTE]

i wasnt really hurt by it, maybe more shocked at the unnecessary response. anyone can call another a cunt on the internet (maybe not face to face, or they'll get their ass kicked for it ;)) but again in general im not here to make enemies and if it would come to this then goodbye MS for me, being here for me is that i share something in common with many others on here and we can discuss and share our different views without animosity, racism or pointless arguments. its the music, music, music theres enough wars and hate going on out there and i come here coz i need a break from all that crap so keep it good, peaceful, clean and MS, and its harder to make a friend than an enemy. Remember we can all be rocking to the same tune oneday. so no hard feelings here.

Re: Iran's Reactor

i feel ya man. but, lol, it's just a stupid image macro! don't take it serious! good lord. fyi, i can back up anything posted online face to face dude. when and where, you name it. i shit you not. i don't afraid of anything. =) but yeah just liek you said: don't stress it, just keep it chill. omitt the fun image jargon --- if it offenends you. i mean nothing by it. just take it ezzz. the problem with this forum is that people invest so much of their energy in trivial, sensational news that is quick to catapult slander, acrimony, extreme idealism, biased, and bullshit etc. common sense is preeminent.

chunky, quite the whining. it's minuscule crap. ban me if you wish!

politics forum dawg. lol

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;888796] chunky, quite the whining. it's minuscule crap. ban me if you wish!

politics forum dawg. lol[/QUOTE]

Quality, you write about the internet giving you the opportunity to say what you want then you ask me to stop.

[FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=2][/SIZE][/FONT]

Re: Iran's Reactor

i don't need the internet to say what i want. it surely is not an opportunity; i'm myself always, and i say what i want all the time, and anywhere, with discernment.

the internet isn't to be taken as foolproof truth, by the way. oh! and i was being sarcastic. please, by all means... don't stop... and don't provoke me to troll, cause i really am displeased towards doing so; but i'll do so if said people rage up hard by what others say on a fucking msg board(lulz), and start feeling victimized by others adamant inquiries into outlandish sensationalism and nebulous theories. people really do become enslaved by their devout idealism and beliefs.

and as far as the reactor, well, it goes like this: political beating around the bush and prolonged diplomatic deflection allows said begrudged factions to build up/plan for an assult. a simple tactic of war, really.

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;889023]i don't need the internet to say what i want. it surely is not an opportunity; i'm myself always, and i say what i want all the time, and anywhere, with discernment.

the internet isn't to be taken as foolproof truth, by the way. oh! and i was being sarcastic. please, by all means... don't stop... and don't provoke me to troll, cause i really am displeased towards doing so; but i'll do so if said people rage up hard by what others say on a fucking msg board(lulz), and start feeling victimized by others adamant inquiries into outlandish sensationalism and nebulous theories. people really do become enslaved by their devout idealism and beliefs. [/QUOTE]

Get over yourself :roll:

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=chunky;889091]Get over yourself :roll:[/QUOTE]

^ lol, successfully done my job then. trolling is an art,

[IMG]http://imgur.com/v0NsH.jpg[/IMG]

Re:

[QUOTE=dig72;888275]

I'll ask you again, "Do you think a nation saving it's limited resources is a good idea?"

[/QUOTE]

no. export it to us; we shamefully are still dependent on it (we will compensate dem wit debens). all wars are partial to securing resources.

in'a world like today, though, cooperative global trade makes the world go round yo

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;889141]^ lol, successfully done my job then. trolling is an art, [/QUOTE]

Me thinks someone has an over grown sense of their own importance. Your starting to sound like someone who thinks he can stir the barbecue coals with his own penis. "My Job" No really, get over yourself.

Re: Iran's Reactor

lol no, it's the trolling act that makes you think that. :lol:

i like the elucidating edits btw!

ya mon, aye be livin in self forgetfulness - forsaking egotism and vanity

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;889160]lol no, it's the trolling act that makes you think that. :lol:

i like the elucidating edits btw!

ya mon, aye be livin in self forgetfulness - forsaking egotism and vanity[/QUOTE]

In order for it to be trolling I would have to be upset and I'm far from upset. Your post will keep me laughing for some time

Re: Iran's Reactor

[IMG]http://i394.photobucket.com/albums/pp21/Conway77/popcornj.gif[/IMG]

it's response. idgaf if you're not upset

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;889141]my job
[/QUOTE]

[U][COLOR=#0000ff][img]http://smileyicons.net/s/493.gif[/img][/COLOR][/U][URL="http://smileyicons.net/s/493.gif"][/URL]

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;889162][IMG]http://i394.photobucket.com/albums/pp21/Conway77/popcornj.gif[/IMG]

it's response. idgaf if you're not upset[/QUOTE]

You don't have to worry I'm fine. Your post reminds me of a PM superwave sent me

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=chunky;889165][U][COLOR=#0000ff][img]http://smileyicons.net/s/493.gif[/img][/COLOR][/U][URL="http://smileyicons.net/s/493.gif"][/URL][/QUOTE]

[URL="http://gullibletest.com/"]my job rules! [/URL]

Re: Iran's Reactor

[QUOTE=i!!ustrious;889170][URL="http://gullibletest.com/"]my job rules! [/URL][/QUOTE]

Failed again. Your trick is highlighted on an email message. Whats funny is you must of gone there yourself in the past, epic fail [img]http://smileyicons.net/s/529.gif[/img]

Re: Iran's Reactor

Cheers on another incredibly shitty thread, guys.

Re: Iran's Reactor

I do not understand what the problem is big is Iran to have nuclear weapons. The whole area is surrounded by nuclear weapons, why do not they defend themselves? 9 / 11 had nothing to do with Iran, so it's not terrorism.

Re: Iran's Reactor

QUOTE - Australia is at odds with its major security ally the United States over Iran, saying it is not a "rogue state" and its nuclear weapons program is for deterrence, not attack, according to U.S. cables released by WikiLeaks.

The documents, published in the Sydney Morning Herald on Monday, also reveal that Australia's top security organisation believes Tehran sees a "grand bargain" with the United States as its best way to ensure national security.

But the Office of National Assessments (ONA) shared Washington's fears that Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons could lead to conventional or nuclear war, noting a conflict between Israel and Iran was the greatest challenge to Middle East stability.

The ONA was also concerned that nuclear proliferation in the Middle East may drive Southeast Asian nations to pursue their own nuclear capabilities.

"It's a mistake to think of Iran as a 'rogue state'," then ONA chief Peter Varghese told the United States in a briefing, according to the 2008 U.S. diplomatic cables from Canberra.

The cables said the ONA sought a balanced view of Tehran as a sophisticated diplomatic player rather than one liable to behave impulsively or irrationally.

WikiLeaks has provoked fury in Washington with its publications of secret U.S. cables and has vowed to make public details of the 250,000 secret U.S. documents it had obtained.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is under arrest in Britain over sexual assault charges in Sweden.

TEHRAN SEEKS DETERRENCE

A U.S. diplomatic cable from Canberra in 2008 said the ONA believed Tehran's desire to develop nuclear weapons was probably driven by a desire to deter Israel and the United States from attack rather than to launch a Middle East strike.

"ONA viewed Tehran's nuclear program within the paradigm of 'the laws of deterrence', noting that Iran's ability to produce a weapon may be 'enough' to meet its security objectives,'' the U.S. embassy reported to Washington.

"Nevertheless, Australian intelligence viewed Tehran's pursuit of full self-sufficiency in the nuclear fuel cycle, long-standing covert weapons program, and continued work on delivery systems as strong indicators that Tehran's preferred end state included a nuclear arsenal."

The ONA believed "Iran's acquisition of nuclear weapons as inevitable" and the Australian government was concerned that such a move could see nuclear proliferation in Southeast Asia.

A U.S. embassy report in March 2009 told Washington that Australia was "concerned about the potential for renewed nuclear proliferation in the Middle East driving Southeast Asian states to abandon the (nuclear non-proliferation treaty) and pursue their own nuclear capabilities, which could introduce a direct threat to the Australian homeland."

But Australian intelligence analysts believe "that 20 years of hostility (towards Washington) and associated rhetoric aside, (Tehran) regime attitudes "have fairly shallow roots."

"The most effective means by which Tehran could ensure its national security would be a strategic relationship with the U.S. via some 'grand bargain'," said Australia's security agency.[/QUOTE]

interesting I would say...kinda ties in with what Chomsky said