Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917375]New phenomenon eh?

[URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_expansion[/URL]

[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specific_heat_capacity"]Specific heat capacity[/URL] [I]c[/I] = [I]T[/I] [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/d/e/7/de71b72c4f62f20d117414dd2f33ca25.png[/IMG] [I]N[/I] [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/f/7/af7e8a85df47250ffab736b7a8807488.png[/IMG]

[URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressibility"]Compressibility[/URL] β = − 1 [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/8/8/888fa252e9cde41ef196d5154cd7219c.png[/IMG] [I]V[/I] [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/1/f/5/1f58273c4161e57f62a95804c2ae961a.png[/IMG] [B]

Thermal expansion[/B] α = 1 [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/8/8/888fa252e9cde41ef196d5154cd7219c.png[/IMG] [I]V[/I] [IMG]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/a/f/7/af7e8a85df47250ffab736b7a8807488.png[/IMG][/QUOTE]

Hey res0 you know Wikipedia is no actually an encyclopedia, its people taking guesses

Re: The War on Truthers

[IMG]http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p253/71chunky/odds/aircraftcomparison.gif[/IMG]

So looking at these pictures would you say one plane is 20% bigger than the other?

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=chunky;917376]Hey res0 you know Wikipedia is no actually an encyclopedia, its people taking guesses[/QUOTE]

Physics player, no guesses here.

[QUOTE=chunky;917377][IMG]http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p253/71chunky/odds/aircraftcomparison.gif[/IMG]

So looking at these pictures would you say one plane is 20% bigger than the other?[/QUOTE]

No but the dumbass you send me in the video @ 19 minutes said that. Fail.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917378]Physics player, no guesses here.

No but the dumbass you send me in the video @ 19 minutes said that. Fail.[/QUOTE]

The dumb ass said they are actually fairly comparable (Capable of being compared; worthy of comparison) . NIST said

[QUOTE][B]1. If the World Trade Center (WTC) towers were designed to withstand multiple impacts by Boeing 707 aircraft, why did the impact of individual 767s cause so much damage?

[/B]The damage from the impact of a Boeing 767 aircraft ([COLOR=magenta]which is about 20 percent bigger [/COLOR]than a Boeing 707) into each tower is well documented in NCSTAR 1-2. .[/QUOTE]

Re: The War on Truthers

Same time tomorrow res0. You bring the beers

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=chunky;917387]The dumb ass said they are actually fairly comparable (Capable of being compared; worthy of comparison) . NIST said[/QUOTE]

so +/- 20% for your fault tolerance is fairly comparable? you have failed.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917390]so +/- 20% for your fault tolerance is fairly comparable? you have failed.[/QUOTE]

So looking at these pictures would [COLOR=red]you[/COLOR] say one plane is 20% bigger than the other?

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917390]so +/- 20% for your fault tolerance is fairly comparable? you have failed.[/QUOTE]

Hey you back to the self-gratification again Res0. You will be closing threads again next. It takes pages and pages to get a simple answer out of you.

Re: The War on Truthers

Please enroll in some science classes so you actually understand how the real world works before you comment any further. Here is a good start:

[url]http://www.khanacademy.org/#Physics[/url]

Kthx.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917390]so +/- 20% for your fault tolerance is fairly comparable? you have failed.[/QUOTE]

No I'm saying they are closer than 20%

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917401]Please enroll in some science classes so you actually understand how the real world works before you comment any further. Here is a good start:

[URL]http://www.khanacademy.org/#Physics[/URL]

Kthx.[/QUOTE]

Yet again you still won't answer the question. And your attempts at belittlement are getting tiresome. You don't see anyone else being rude around here.

Re: The War on Truthers

i know, just stupid.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=chunky;917402]No I'm saying they are closer than 20%[/QUOTE]

Answer: Irrelevant.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917410]Answer: Irrelevant.[/QUOTE]

Ok there is no point in talking to you any more. If anyone else is willing to discuss it, I'm more than happy to respond

Re: The War on Truthers

^It is irrelevant, because for the 50th time, if the plane was not tested against the building, then there is no way to know if/if not it could withstand the impact. Sounds logical right?

Re: The War on Truthers

Seems to me Res0 you're more interested in shouting people down and shutting them up than entering into any sort of debate or discussion.

Re: The War on Truthers

^please acknowledge if the above is logical to you or not.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;917423]^please acknowledge if the above is logical to you or not.[/QUOTE]

No it is not. See I'm willing to answer your questions and I'm more than happy to expain why.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=chunky;917424]No it is not. See I'm willing to answer your questions[/quote]

Ok then there is no need to talk in this thread anymore since your common sense is MIA. Thanks, it has been fun.

Re: The War on Truthers

you see "Reso people" as I will call them don't have debates. They only have insults.

Chunky don't you know your crazy and you should be wearing a foil hat because you don't believe the official version, that not even the officials that wrote it believe anymore? God... You must have a really small brain and live in a small world..

Re: The War on Truthers

^^^^^^^^

Stones in glass houses much?

Re: The War on Truthers

summary of this topic up to now:

[img]http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/12/39/73/16/trlht10.jpg[/img]

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=CircleUP;917483]summary of this topic up to now:

[IMG]http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/12/39/73/16/trlht10.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]

You're the one going off topic the most

Re: The War on Truthers

Ok so does anyone else here agree with res0 that the planes are not comparable.

Re: The War on Truthers

[IMG]http://football-talk.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/donkey.jpg[/IMG]

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=CircleUP;917483]summary of this topic up to now:

[img]http://i39.servimg.com/u/f39/12/39/73/16/trlht10.jpg[/img][/QUOTE]

Blatant trollery at its finest ain't it? :lol:

Re: The War on Truthers

Res0 logic

[QUOTE]How about, the building was built in the 1940's, meaning it is 70 years old. This is the US gov't. My local bar has better security than most outdated gov't shit, unfortunately since you don't live here you don't know how much bullshit goes on with the US gov't. So totally believable that there are no cameras covering every square inch of this building.

It is almost at wide as the Empire State Building is tall. [/QUOTE]Someone had to bring this back. Maybe I should make it my signature

Re: The War on Truthers

glad you liked the image :)

Re: The War on Truthers

antique cctv

Re: The War on Truthers

CIA Asset Susan Lindauer blowing the whistle on 9/11 and Iraq, and Israel on the Kevin Barret radio show.

[URL]http://noliesradio.org/archives/27509[/URL]

I prefer the interview she gave on [URL]http://theuglytruth.podbean.com/[/URL] with host Mark Glenn.

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=dig72;918984]CIA Asset Susan Lindauer blowing the whistle on 9/11 and Iraq, and Israel on the Kevin Barret radio show.

[URL]http://noliesradio.org/archives/27509[/URL]

.[/QUOTE]

interesting...thanks

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=bobjuice;919006]interesting...thanks[/QUOTE]

No problem. Part 2 of her interview wll be on next week.

When Susan decribes the call she made to her brother, warning him to stay out of New York, southern Manhattan, she also metions that the attacks were imminent, will cause mass casualties, involved highjacked planes targeting WTC and possibly loaded with a 'nuclear device'.

Now she doesn't mention 'nuclear device' for no reason, the threat is real. If you're not familiar with the stolen nukes built in South Africa by Israel, then get on board and have a listen as Gordan Duff and Jeff Gates fill in all the blanks.

[URL]http://theuglytruth.podbean.com/2010/06/03/the-ugly-truth-podcast-june-3-2010/[/URL]

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=chunky;917356]I have never said the plane did exist at the time. But I have asked you was a 707 the largest plane in operation at the at the time of the design of the building[/QUOTE]

Waiting Res0

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=chunky;917354]Do you think one plane hitting one building is a multiple attack? How many more times do I have to ask[/QUOTE]

Still waiting

Re: The War on Truthers

im really fucking confused by what the fuck you are trying to say. try rephrasing the question in a form which the majority of the people here can understand and maybe i'll reiterate myself for the 100th time so you can keep giggling to yourself about :deadhorse:

Re: The War on Truthers

Question 1 Do you think one plane hitting one building is a multiple attack? How many more times do I have to ask

Question 2 Was a 707 the largest plane in operation at the at the time of the design of the building

How many more times do I have to ask. matbe you should get a Rosetta Stone Res0

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=chunky;936950]Question 1 Do you think one plane hitting one building is a multiple attack? How many more times do I have to ask [/QUOTE]

I'd say one. Now I'm sure you will follow up with some misinterpretation of the English language of some post you are about to cite, and also post something extremely irrelevant. But I already answered this in post #274, which is what I'm sure you are getting at. (look for the purple)

[URL]http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/showthread.php?82690-The-War-on-Truthers&p=916934&viewfull=1#post916934[/URL]

[quote] Question 2 Was a 707 the largest plane in operation at the at the time of the design of the building

How many more times do I have to ask. matbe you should get a Rosetta Stone Res0[/quote]Yes/No/Maybe/Whocares? It is irrelevant.

I also answered this in post #283

[URL]http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/showthread.php?82690-The-War-on-Truthers&p=917079&viewfull=1#post917079[/URL]

Sigh.

Re: The War on Truthers

lol that is quite funny

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;936973]I'd say one. Now I'm sure you will follow up with some misinterpretation of the English language of some post you are about to cite, and also post something extremely irrelevant. But I already answered this in post #274, which is what I'm sure you are getting at. (look for the purple) [/QUOTE]

yahoo we can get going. So you are saying that a Boeing 767 aircraft ([COLOR=magenta]is about 20 percent bigger [/COLOR]than a Boeing 707)

Look at the picture below the

Length 707 is 153' 20% more would make it about 30' longer instead it's only 6' Wingspan 707 is 146' 20% more would make it 29' wider instead it's only 10' Tail 707 is 38' is 46' so yes the tail is bigger Take Off weight 707 336,000 20% more would make it 403.

They when you take into account the plane wasn't fully loaded or fully fueled that number drops. So its safe to say with the exception of the tail its not 20% bigger

[IMG]http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p253/71chunky/odds/aircraftcomparison.gif[/IMG]

Re: The War on Truthers

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;936973]

Yes/No/Maybe/Whocares? It is irrelevant.

I also answered this in post #283

[URL]http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/showthread.php?82690-The-War-on-Truthers&p=917079&viewfull=1#post917079[/URL]

Sigh.[/QUOTE]

Can you highlight it in purple