[ms] · Est. May 2002
One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.
Re: The War on Truthers
Everyone knows you're a classic denial case. You don't want to look at footage, you don't want to read the literature, you just have to stick to the official story because anything else is to scary for you to accept. Lets not forget you where also in denial about Bush & Cheney being complicate in torture. How did that work out for you?
Re: The War on Truthers
:lol: I'll stick with the majorty.
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;915883][URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center[/URL]
Is this you being intentionally stupid again?[/QUOTE]
Hey Res0 I will tell you a secret Wikipedia is not actually an encyclopedia, its people taking a guess:lol:
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;915885]:lol: I'll stick with the majorty.[/QUOTE]
you mean you will stick your head in the sand as usual
Re: The War on Truthers
Funny thing is all this started just because I gave someone at work a couple of DVD's at work. You're more pissed off than my employer was:lol:
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=chunky;915886]Hey Res0 I will tell you a secret Wikipedia is not actually an encyclopedia, its people taking a guess:lol:[/QUOTE]
I know...the only people who know the 'real truth' are the bedroom engineers who see thru the bullshit. Everyone else is just a bought puppet of the damn US EVIL EMPIRE!@#!@#!@#!!@!!#@!#@
Re: The War on Truthers
Also believe nothing you ever read on the internets. It was created and funded by the US Gov't.
Re: The War on Truthers
I will get back to you in a minute as I have just won some tapes on eBay and I want to pay for them straight away:lol:
A musical interlude
[video=youtube;MDCfEkopryo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MDCfEkopryo[/video]
Re: The War on Truthers
u know what man, theres no point, u'll just end up disappearing from the thread anyways, so i'll just go hit the pipe hard instead
Re: The War on Truthers
^good move.
Re: The War on Truthers
[img]http://i.imgur.com/FZEMa.jpg[/img]
Re: The War on Truthers
:roflmao:
Your science = bullshit brownies, and your a scientist...:Bingo:
Re: The War on Truthers
i know i know i know, all those people backing their crazy ideas up with facts, figures, math etc are all wrong.
Re: The War on Truthers
You haven't backed anything up. You refuse to read anything, you refuse to watch anything and you refuse to listen to anything. You just keep spouting out your nonsense. Funny thing is, like you said yourself you haven't achieved anything by doing so. All you're actually doing is trying to hold on to the belief that the US government couldn't do such a thing, which has been proved time and time again to be wrong.
Re: The War on Truthers
Proved by kids in their dorm rooms from watching youtube footage? I guess you are right.
Re: The War on Truthers
I love the way you try to place everything in the lap of Dylan Avery. Give us your logical killing quote now Res(
Re: The War on Truthers
That conspiracy nonsense not backed up by any credible science is bullshit? :lol:
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;916049]That conspiracy nonsense not backed up by any credible science is bullshit? :lol:[/QUOTE]
How did you get on with that NIST report I posted Res) Have you read it yet? I recon NO
Re: The War on Truthers
At least in the old days we had Miro who read and watched shit. Now we have Wac0 with his head in the sand
Re: The War on Truthers
:lol: Also like I said you shouldn't be on the internets, it is a product of the US Gov't. You can't trust it.
Re: The War on Truthers
[FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=white]♪♪♪♪♪♪[/COLOR][/FONT][COLOR=white]The Wac0 highlight of the year [/COLOR][FONT=Times New Roman][COLOR=white]♪♪♪♪♪♪[/COLOR][/FONT]
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;916056]:lol: Also like I said you shouldn't be on the internets, it is a product of the US Gov't. You can't trust it.[/QUOTE]
This post is actually your lexicon. I will let you think about it, then post tomorrow why. If you haven't worked it out.
Re: The War on Truthers
and if u dont reso, you can always just post a stupid picture instead
Re: The War on Truthers
really should stop using the internets, your words are being manipulated by the us gov't as they flow thru the tubes is all im sayin.
Re: The War on Truthers
This is my post:
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;916056]:lol: Also like I said you shouldn't be on the internets, it is a product of the US Gov't. You can't trust it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=chunky;916059]This post is actually your lexicon. I will let you think about it, then post tomorrow why. If you haven't worked it out.[/QUOTE]
This is my lexicon:
[video=youtube;4nuvwCzeJ7E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nuvwCzeJ7E[/video]
[img]http://i.min.us/idSwV0.png[/img]
Re: The War on Truthers
Reso don't disgrace my boys track.
Happy New Year Politics Section!!
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=runningman;916078]Reso don't disgrace my boys track.
Happy New Year Politics Section!![/QUOTE]
You and him can't both like that track because in Res0 world (where everything is black & white) you would both agree on something which would mean you and him would be holocaust deniers bt default. Or has he created a paradox?
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=chunky;916115]You and him can't both like that track because in Res0 world (where everything is black & white) you would both agree on something which would mean you and him would be holocaust deniers bt default. Or has he created a paradox?[/QUOTE]
what makes you so sure that your videos/stats/figures are all 100% correct? the simplest answer is always the best and most logical one
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=CircleUP;916222]what makes you so sure that your videos/stats/figures are all 100% correct? the simplest answer is always the best and most logical one[/QUOTE]
From the krazy old skool: Occams Razor
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor[/url]
But...gots to be funded by the US (even though its about 500 years too early), so it can't hold any weight ;)
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=CircleUP;916222]what makes you so sure that your videos/stats/figures are all 100% correct? the simplest answer is always the best and most logical one[/QUOTE]
Like building 7 having all the characteristics of a controled demolition and being the only steel framed building to be brought down as a result of fire.
[video=youtube;LD06SAf0p9A]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A[/video]
Re: The War on Truthers
lol @ controlled demolition
it's common sense that if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's likely to fall. damaged supports can only hold so much weight for a certain amount of time before they collapse. buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks :idea:
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=CircleUP;916334]if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's [COLOR=orange][I]likely[/I][/COLOR] to fall. [/QUOTE]
No it isn't
[QUOTE=CircleUP;916334] buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks[/QUOTE]
Yes they are
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=CircleUP;916334]lol @ controlled demolition
it's common sense that if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's likely to fall. damaged supports can only hold so much weight for a certain amount of time before they collapse. buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks :idea:[/QUOTE]
wow, just when i thought it couldnt get worse
Re: The War on Truthers
i was speaking of a building damaged BY an airplane attack. the initial explosion and fire will damage the support structures and affect the building's structural integrity
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=CircleUP;916334]lol @ controlled demolition
it's common sense that if the support structures of a building are damaged then it's likely to fall. damaged supports can only hold so much weight for a certain amount of time before they collapse. buildings were not meant to withstand airplane attacks :idea:[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE] John Skilling was the head structural engineer for the World Trade Center. In a 1993 interview, Skilling stated that the Towers were designed to withstand the impact and fires resulting from the collision of a large jetliner such as Boeing 707 or Douglas DC-8.
[IMG]http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p253/71chunky/odds/aircraftcomparison.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE]Yes they were designed to withstand and aircraft collision and with the fuel load. This has been verified many times before. Miro tried to use this argument before using one of the architects Aaron Swirsky (check out Aaron Swirsky at 17.45 on the video below)
[url]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8707513149655779206&q=source%3A000974024203882481900&hl=en#[/url]
NIST argued that the plane in mind when the towers where being designed was a lot smaller and carried less fuel than the planes that hit the towers. It's all in the Astonishing thread. There was nowhere near enough damage or fire on Building 7 for a collapse to occur. Get Res0 to show you the photo.
You also have the Madrid skyscraper fire burned for 2 days and didn't collapse.
[IMG]http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p253/71chunky/odds/Madrid9.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p253/71chunky/odds/wtc10.jpg[/IMG]
Deepwater Horizon oil burned for 7 days with a constant fuel supply and the structure didn't weaken
[IMG]http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p253/71chunky/odds/burning-oil-rig-explosion-fire-photo11.jpg[/IMG]
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=CircleUP;916376]i was speaking of a building damaged BY an airplane attack. the initial explosion and fire will damage the support structures and affect the building's structural integrity[/QUOTE]
According to NIST in order for this to happen all of the fire protection on the steel columns would have had to have been removed. NIST clam this happened as a result of the impact of the plane. you can also check out Thomas Eager at 20 minutes
[url]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8707513149655779206&q=source%3A000974024203882481900&hl=en#[/url]
Re: The War on Truthers
Also in other building explosions which have no relevance to the Twin Towers, I give you the Nakatomi Building:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/VTHhb.jpg[/IMG]
Great Christmas movie BTW. Happy Holidays everyone.
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;915878]~1 hour and ~1 hour and 45 mins actually.[/QUOTE]
did it take that long for the Nakatomi Building as well? i guess you came up with the 1hr45mins based on the movie run time
btw i dont believe that the american government as a whole planned and knew about the attacks.
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=trick12;916473]did it take that long for the Nakatomi Building as well? i guess you came up with the 1hr45mins based on the movie run time.[/QUOTE]
General times (hence the ~) from wikipedia. I'm sure they sourced their info from the official records.
Re: The War on Truthers
[QUOTE=res0nat0r;916479] I'm sure they sourced their info from the official records.[/QUOTE]
Like NIST
[URL]http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/NISTNCSTAR1-6BDraft.pdf[/URL]