HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / Politics

Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

24 durable postsStarted 2010-02-06Latest 2010-02-17
#80023Post 1 of 24

[URL]http://media2.foxnews.com/020410/020410_oreilly_stewartwhole3_FNC_020410_22-24_FNC_HIGH.mp4[/URL]

This is pretty long, from yesterdays show I believe, but pretty good stuff. :D

#1330872Post 2 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

stewart got owned.. don't bother watching that.. if you want to learn something watch this.

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPjMUg9bt_I[/YOUTUBE]

#1331030Post 3 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

:jacked:

#1331033Post 4 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

Stewart O'reilly Colbert Olberman

They are all for entertainment.. Which means they are all liars. You aren't getting the truth from them.

#1331036Post 5 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

heheheh. you dont have to run a show from your basement with a camera with a feed to justin.tv to be telling the truth and taken seriously. life isnt that black and white. just because 60 minutes interviews robin williams, does that mean that mike wallace is a complete liar, right? ;)

#1331093Post 6 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

Also Stewart is the most trusted newsanchor in the US according to polls. ironic eh?

#1331237Post 7 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

[QUOTE=runningman;831862]Stewart O'reilly Colbert Olberman

They are all for entertainment.. Which means they are all liars. You aren't getting the truth from them.[/QUOTE]

we come to you for the truth........ :lol:

#1331254Post 8 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

you should.. I say more truth than all those guys.

#1331293Post 9 of 24

Yeah. On planet Zoltan.


[IMG]http://mercuryserver.com/forums/images/mobile.gif[/IMG] [I][COLOR=Orange][ms] mobile[/COLOR][/I]

#1331307Post 10 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

[QUOTE=runningman;832108]you should.. I say more truth than all those guys.[/QUOTE]

Half baked conspiracy theories =/= truth.

#1331317Post 11 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

You are more of a load speaker kind of guy? We should just have state run media right?

You're right the CIA didn't import cocaine to Ricky Ross You're right the CIA didn't have a black op to overthrow Iran You're right the US doesn't use economic hitmen to force countries into debt You're right the Pentagon doesn't have any cameras outside You're right the US doesn't want to fight Iran You're right Iraq did have WMD's You're right the economy is on the up and up You're right the economy won't get worse Youre right the US wasn't part of Gulf of Tonkin You're right there was never this thing called operation Northwoods You're right the Patriot Act doesn't infringe on any of your rights You're right the bankers didn't rob us You're right everyone should get the H1N1 Vaccine because H1N1 killed millions You're right cops should dress u pin camo and Sexualy abuse women You're right GMO corn and foods are healthier than organic

[IMG]http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/372282/2/istockphoto_372282-twilight-zone.jpg[/IMG] Insert Twilight zone music or 1984 whatever you prefer

So what did I lie about again??

#1331368Post 12 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

:jacked:

#1331376Post 13 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

jon stewart schooled oreilly

#1331514Post 14 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

:runningman::runningman::runningman::runningman::runningman::runningman:

the superbowl was on tv yesterday btw.

#1331519Post 15 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

Here I thought you were going to try to debunk anything I said there. It will only take you a few searches.. Go for it on any point. I dare you. I made it my signature so you don't forget.

I guess it must be easier (flight) to just call me crazy. That way you don't have to get involved.

#1331534Post 16 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

whatever anyone on here says is automatically incorrect so why bother?

#1331572Post 17 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

When was the last time you watched Animal Farm?

[YOUTUBE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZldlyeR8DU[/YOUTUBE]

#1332114Post 18 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

[QUOTE=runningman;831689]stewart got owned.. don't bother watching that.. if you want to learn something watch this.

[YOUTUBE]MPjMUg9bt_I[/YOUTUBE][/QUOTE] :lol: No way known he got owned, :lol: I think it went over your head as well !! I'm loving this !!! :lol:

#1332116Post 19 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;832441]whatever anyone on here says is automatically incorrect so why bother?[/QUOTE]

you moron :lol:

#1332125Post 20 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

Have to say I usually switch off very, very quickly, but I just watched that whole thing and I love Jon Stewart. His brain works superbly !!

#1336073Post 21 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

[URL]http://www.theonion.com/content/news/conspiracy_theorist_convinces_neil[/URL]

                                                                                         [B]Conspiracy Theorist Convinces Neil Armstrong Moon Landing Was Faked[/B]

                     August 31, 2009  |      [URL="http://www.theonion.com/content/index/4536"]Issue 45•36[/URL]            
                   [IMG]http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/Neil_article_large.article_large.jpg[/IMG]                    A 1969 photo showing Armstrong, or anyone, really, standing on the surface of the "moon."
           
         

  
LEBANON, OHIO—Apollo 11 mission commander and famed astronaut Neil Armstrong shocked reporters at a press conference Monday, announcing he had been convinced that his historic first step on the moon was part of an elaborate hoax orchestrated by the United States government.
                        According to Armstrong, he was forced to reconsider every single detail of the monumental journey after watching a few persuasive YouTube videos, and reading several blog posts on conspiracy theorist Ralph Coleman's website, OmissionControl.org. 

[b]"It only took a few hastily written paragraphs published by this passionate denier of mankind's so-called 'greatest technological achievement' for me to realize I had been living a lie, "[/b] said a visibly emotional Armstrong, addressing reporters at his home. "It has become painfully clear to me that on July 20, 1969, the Lunar Module under the control of my crew did not in fact travel 250,000 miles over eight days, touch down on the moon, and perform various experiments, ushering in a new era for humanity. Instead, the entire thing was filmed on a soundstage, most likely in New Mexico." "This is the only logical interpretation of the numerous inconsistencies in the grainy, 40-year-old footage," Armstrong added. [URL="http://javascript%3Cb%3E%3C/b%3E:void%280%29;"] Enlarge Image [IMG]http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/omission_control2.article.jpg[/IMG][/URL]Amstrong was swayed by OmissionControl's use of bolding and capital letters to highlight NASA's many blatant fallacies.

Although Armstrong said he "could have sworn" he felt the effects of zero gravity while soaring out of the Earth's atmosphere and through space, he now believed his memory must be flawed. He also admitted feeling "ashamed" that he had failed to notice the rippling of the American flag he and Buzz Aldrin planted on the surface, blaming his lack of awareness on the bulkiness of the spacesuit and his excitement about traveling to the "moon." "That rippling is not possible in the vacuum of space," Armstrong said. "It must have been the wind from an air-conditioning duct that I didn't recognize because you can't hear a damn thing inside those helmets." "This is all just common sense, people," he added. "It's the moon. You can't land on the moon." In a symbolic display of his newfound skepticism, Armstrong then grabbed a collection of moon rocks he had kept as souvenirs and dramatically dumped them into a trash can. One of the main arguments posited on Coleman's website—that America could not, in 1969, have realistically possessed the technological capabilities needed to put a man on the moon—was reportedly one of the first things to cause the legendary astronaut a pang of doubt. Despite having spent thousands of hours training for the historic mission under the guidance of the world's top scientists, technicians, and pilots, Armstrong said he knew the conspiracy theories were true after learning that website author Coleman was "quite the engineering buff." "Yes, at the time I thought those thousands of NASA employees were working round the clock for the same incredible goal, but if anyone would know what was really going on, it would be Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said of the 31-year-old part-time librarian's assistant. "He knows a lot more about faked moon landings than I ever could. He's been researching the subject on the Internet for years." "Literally years," he added. Addressing another inconsistency brought to light by OmissionControl, Armstrong explained he was probably so focused on piloting the lunar module that he failed to notice that one of the moon rocks visible in footage of the landing appears to have the letter 'C' stamped on it. An emotional Armstrong said that the only possible explanation for this detail was that the rock actually came from NASA's prop department. "They forgot to turn it over," Armstrong said, removing his eyeglasses to wipe away tears. "Those lying bastards at NASA went through all the trouble to fake the moon landing, but they forgot to turn over one little prop rock. And now the whole damn thing's blowing up in their faces." Although Armstrong initially questioned why the U.S. would attempt such an elaborate cover-up, he cited one overarching explanation provided by Coleman: that it was a ploy to defeat the Soviet Union and fulfill the Illuminati's plan to unify the world's banks and control the dissemination of information. "Just ask Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said. "He'll answer any questions you have." To conclude the press conference, Armstrong showed reporters footage of his first steps on the moon to demonstrate that the most daming evidence was "right under our noses." Speeding up the tape and replaying the graceful moonwalk several times in a row, Armstrong explained that the iconic images of humanity's triumphant dance with the cosmos was actually just a film of him walking backwards, slowed down, and played in reverse. "What other explanation could there be?" Armstrong asked. "It's all right here. Everything is all right here if you'd just open your damn eyes and see!" Added Armstrong, "I suppose it really was one small step for man, one giant lie for mankind." [IMG]http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/onion/assets/terminator.gif[/IMG]

#1336103Post 22 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

:lol: :lol: :lol:

#1336728Post 23 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

I found it offensive when O'Reilly stated that 'All of your fans are stoned slackers'

I watch the Daily Show every day and I am far from a slacker...

#1336733Post 24 of 24

Re: Jon Stewart on O'Reilly - Uncut

thats billy for you. he likes to generalize and try and inflame.

Log in to reply