so you are saying that you will lay idle until a panacea has been born...until then you will scoff at anyone that does not have a completely unifying theory
sounds to me like you think you are smarter...sounds to me like everything you accuse me of you are guilty of...so its a moot point
i respect your position and one day i hope to offer a much clearer way of achieving such a goal
i have been thinking long and hard of how to tie loose ends so cynics such as yourself will no longer be able continue the stagnation...i understand i must appeal to your absolutist nature in order to "make sense," I must truly rid you of thinking dynamically, that would be too painful wouldn't it? maybe your absolutist expectations are the underlying problem here...i have always said i am attempting to achieve a framework for moral progress that is not static, does not conflict with the laws of nature, entropy, etc.
so as said...perhaps the absolutism you value should be lost...maybe that is the problem...maybe because moral absolutism can never be achieved in a strictly deductivist manner of thinking so your desires for achieving such goals really equate with achieving something impossible to begin with, and more matter of factly could be said to be nihilistic
that is how i see it...i will elaborate more in future posts
please share with me any wisdom you may have