HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / Politics

I Love This Article...

11 durable postsStarted 2007-10-18Latest 2007-11-25
#47029Post 1 of 11

[B]LONDON, England (CNN)[/B] -- A British museum has canceled a lecture by Dr. James Watson, co-discoverer of the DNA double helix, after he claimed black people are less intelligent than whites in a recent newspaper interview.

  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 		 			 		 		 	 	 		 			 				 			 			 				 			 		 	 	 		 			 		 		 		 	 	 	 	 	 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 			 		 	 	 		 			 				 				 			 			 			 		 	 	 	 	 			 			 				 					 					    James Watson won the 1962 Nobel prize for discovering the structure of DNA.

[IMG]http://www.cnn.com/.element/img/2.0/mosaic/base_skins/baseplate/corner_wire_BL.gif[/IMG]

			 			 			 			 			 		 	 	   Watson, who won the 1962 Nobel prize for his part in discovering the structure of DNA, provoked a storm of criticism after his comments were published in the Sunday Times.

The eminent biologist told the British newspaper he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours -- whereas all the testing says not really." Watson, 79, had been due to give a lecture at London's Science Museum on Friday but the museum canceled his appearance, saying his comments had "gone beyond the point of acceptable debate."

The American professor's words have been roundly condemned as "racist," with fellow scientists dismissing his claims as "genetic nonsense."

"He should recognize that statements of this sort have racist functions and are to be deeply, deeply regretted," said Professor Steven Rose of the British Open University. Watson is credited with discovering the double helix along with Maurice Wilkins and Francis Crick in 1962.

			 			 			 			 			 		 	 	   In the newspaper interview, he said there was no reason to think that races which had grown up in separate geographical locations should have evolved identically. He went on to say that although he hoped everyone was equal, "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true".

The British government's skills minister, David Lammy, who is black, called the comments "deeply offensive" and said Watson would only succeed in providing oxygen for extremist political groups.

"It is a shame that a man with a record of scientific distinction should see his work overshadowed by his own irrational prejudices," Lammy told CNN.

Watson is not the first scientist to show sympathy for the theory of a racial basis for intellectual difference. In March of last year Dr. Frank Ellis from Leeds University provoked anger in Britain after he admitted he found evidence that racial groups perform differently "extremely convincing."

#928217Post 2 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

its funny because nobody wants to have an open debate with a nobel prize winner.. I say lets hear what he has to say I mean we listened to him before about DNA right??

#928595Post 3 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

If he can prove it lets listen to the man I mean why is everyone jumping at the guys throat he is a SCIENTIST so lets see what SCIENCE can prove...if it on th other hand turns out to be bolocks hang the fucker...untill then its open for discussion. p.s. This is my oppinion anyway ... it pisses me of that they imediatly wrote him of as a loony just because he has different oppinions on the matter than those that are generally accepted...he didn't say anything violent or violence provoking he merely expressed his oppinion on the matter...an oppinion which perhaps can be proved... It doesnt really change anything anyway even if its true at least not in my mind....who gives a shit which race is GENERALY smarter? Only fucking idiots... Furthermore I don't see why this can't be true just as if you ask anyone who is into bodybuillding about black and white genetics...and is not scared of telling you the truth will say that the blacks have better predispositions for such sports....look at sprinting as another exaple top ten today ALL black? Another example is the cock thing ... lol. black -------------------------------------- white ----------------------- oriental---------- lol

#928614Post 4 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

[QUOTE=runningman;536214]its funny because nobody wants to have an open debate with a nobel prize winner.. I say lets hear what he has to say I mean we listened to him before about DNA right??[/QUOTE]exactly. he should of been left to speak.

I'm not sure whether he chose to back out of his lecture, or was refused, but if he's such a looney, why are people so afraid of letting him spout nonsense?

Let him make his case. Even if he draws in the crowds because of sensationalism - if the science and philosophy holds up, then no-one should be worried.

What good ever came of censoring anyone? Discouraging debate only leads to suspicion, and rightly so.

#928648Post 5 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

^^ true indeed, censorship is bad...but maann I would not ever want to be the first one to try to explain that science out in public. :lol: would be like holding a grenade when the pin falls out.

#928922Post 6 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

I'd prefer to see some evidence that blacks aren't as smart as Asians and White people. I would hope that he has something to back his claims up. Even if does have findings that support his argument, is the lack of intelligence significant enough for an African country not to succeed?

#929782Post 7 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

they are burning this guy at the stake right now... so either he didn't have the data to back up his claims or it is so politically incorrect that they have just dismissed him. I still haven't heard any "real" information still just the claims.

#931272Post 8 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

[I][B]Very untactful for a Nobel Peace Prize recipient. Naturally said for a 72 year old.

Cheers Young[/B][/I]

#938447Post 9 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

Think thats bad for the Nobel prize what about this guy..Guenter Grass...he was a prominent NAZI - SS officer who recieved a nobel prize...lol

#942862Post 10 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

He might have been useful during the Scopes trial.

#942893Post 11 of 11

Re: I Love This Article...

People readily accept that certain breeds of dogs have different predispositions for various traits.... intelligence among them.

German Shepherds are commonly chosen for police training because of their intelligence and athleticism. Bloodhounds are chosen for cadaver dogs because of their keen sense of smell. A pit bull dog has enough bite strength to crush a human skull.... etc..

There are genetic differences among us all. Our genes dictate everything about us. If your mom has blue eyes, and your dad has blue eyes.... then you have blue eyes. Blue eyes are a double-recessive trait, so if both parents have blue eyes then all possible offspring will have them. We readily accept this as fact without any qualms. But as soon as someone makes a less politically correct point, all hell breaks loose. This is problematic, and it stifles progress. We have seen unpopular theories rejected in the past. The world was once thought flat. The earth thought to be the center of the universe. The sun thought to be a chariot. People who questioned these ideas were shunned, shouted down, or even killed.

Am I saying that this exact instance of intelligence of Africans is true? No. Just that we shouldn't be so quick to denounce an idea just because it is unpopular. Such actions have delayed our progress thoughout civilization.

Log in to reply