Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=thesightless]someone come up with a thought here rather than linking articles non stop....[/quote]

for realz. :roll:

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

If they are going to fight in Lebanon than where is the problem ???? they are going to help the children and women that are being murdered by the terrorists of the IDF , exactly like the states are backing Isreal with weapons and political cover up, alot of the sionists around the world would join the front to fight against Hizbullah. PS: I am against the killing of innocent civilians around the world, I am talking about the 200 fighters that are going to fight in Lebanon.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=Jenks][quote="thesightless"][I]someone come up with a thought here rather than linking articles non stop....[/I][/quote]
for realz. :roll:[/quote] :RightOn: I'm voting with these guys. I've just skipped the last 4 books you guys posted. At least you could summarize.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

btw, 60+ UN resolutions and sanctions that Israel has broken and not adhered which foreshadows the amount that have been placed on palestine. as for sightless - leave out the 'fat' from your arguments and just get to the point (refers to other threads). ;)

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

Just wanted to ask you dave since you are the only jewish that I know on this board , is it true that in times of war even the children of the enemy are considered as enemies, please clearify this for me , [URL="http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/08/04/talmudic_council_in_war_time_even_enemy"]http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/08/04/talmudic_council_in_war_time_even_enemy[/URL]

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

I'm not gonna write 4 pages on this. All I have to say is...

Israel/USA/the West are far from perfect. Sure, they've done their share of asshole things. And yes, Palestinians should be allowed to live in peaceful dignity on land that is theirs. But some of you on here talk as if Hezbollah and the rest of their Islamic fundamentalist militant bretheren spread across the Middle East are such great folks...if you think that, you got some serious fuckin screws loose.

Those guys don't stand for peace. They don't even stand for the poor, innocent people of the Middle East - heck, look at how they treat women in their own societies. They stand for their own perverse, religiously infused political agenda. They want to see their repressive Shariah law from sea to shining sea, and think they have a mandate from God to kill others who think differently. And if they have their way, there will truly be a third world war soon enough.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

Ok mr.Miroslav , give us your idea os the perfect solution then, at least Hizbullah is resisting the IDF at the moment.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=Bululu]Just wanted to ask you dave since you are the only jewish that I know on this board , is it true that in times of war even the children of the enemy are considered as enemies, please clearify this for me , [URL="http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/08/04/talmudic_council_in_war_time_even_enemy"]http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2006/08/04/talmudic_council_in_war_time_even_enemy[/URL][/quote]

I love it when people quote articles by Khalid Amayreh :roll: :roll: :roll:

Anyway, do some more research on Yesha will you Bululu.

They are to mainstream Judaism the same as Hamas and Hizbollah and Al-quida are to main stream Islam - a bunch of race fanatics who basterdise their religion to suite their own agenda.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

thanks for the clarifications dave , and I assume that you think what these people (Yesha) belive in is wrong , or am I wrong dave????

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

Dave one more thing , Al Qaida and Hizbullah are not the same thing , Hizbullah are fighting to liberise their land , yes they had suicide bombers before , an American university did research on this topic and found that 49 people killed themselves for the cause of Hizbullah since Hizbullah was created after the invasion of Isreal to Lebanon in 82 , only 8 were Islamists , the rest were christians or Left wing fighters from all over the world, my source was the Swiss news TSR so sorry I don't have an internet link. So Hizbullah and Al Qaida are not the same thing and you know it , Hizbullah have a cause , Al Qaida are just bunch of Blood Hungry mother fuckers that would kill anyone that doesn't follow exactly what they want, and thanks to the United States for training their leader Usama when he was in Afghanistan .

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

-Cease Fire accepted by Isreal-

Maybe we should lock this thread now.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[url]http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html[/url]

that is all

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

The link doesn't work HOS. [IMG]http://static.sky.com/images/skycom/chn_404error.gif[/IMG] Sorry, the page you are looking for does not exist.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

it is fixed!

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[QUOTE=Hos][url]http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html[/url]

that is all[/QUOTE]

hello

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

Hos are you talking to yourself man ????

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=Hos][URL="http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html"]http://news.sky.com/skynews/video/videoplayer/0,,31200-galloway_060806,00.html[/URL]

that is all[/quote]

Indeed.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[URL="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/09/AR2006050900878.html"]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/09/AR2006050900878.html[/URL]

:shock: :shock: :shock:

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

so the question is, what do we do when hezzbollah doesnt disarm and they do it again in a year? do we do this again?

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

and the first person to say they wont, or might not, just save your energy, you are a fucking idiot. it will happen again. its not just the pessimist in me.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=CHiEF_N][URL="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/09/AR2006050900878.html"]http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/09/AR2006050900878.html[/URL]

:shock: :shock: :shock:[/quote]

Has anyone had the chance to read this?

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=CHiEF_N]Has anyone had the chance to read this?[/quote]

that is coming from a man, who calls his religion the religion of peace,when in fact, it has done more damage than any war, drags homosexuals into the streets and kills them, allows for honor killings, and directly at amenijihad, the guy is still pushing for people in iran to be forced to wear badges based on religion. take it for what you want to.:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

not to trash a religion, they are all good in ways, but that right there, is the ultimate pot calling kettle black.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

and to those who said we trained bin laden, im not denying it, but yet again, another person who has met bin laden and denies it

[URL="http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/08/15/bergen.answers/index.html"]http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/08/15/bergen.answers/index.html[/URL]

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=thesightless]that is coming from a man, who calls his religion the religion of peace,when in fact, it has done more damage than any war, drags homosexuals into the streets and kills them, allows for honor killings, and directly at amenijihad, the guy is still pushing for people in iran to be forced to wear badges based on religion. take it for what you want to.:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

not to trash a religion, they are all good in ways, but that right there, is the ultimate pot calling kettle black.[/quote]

I know this may sound like it's completely off topic, but I have a passion for snowboarding and skiing. I watched this documentary by Warren Miller called Cold Fusion. In this film several famous skiers went to the Iranian mountains. On the way though they stopped to check out the culture and meet the people. In the film, I didn't see the horribly aggressive and oppressive picture that the media likes to paint for the country. I saw Iranian civilians that appeared to be enjoying life just like any American. The documentary spoke of the older strict traditions of the women mandatorily made to wear veils over their faces and other oppressive practices of this nature that were progressively easing up on them. It showed a public ski resort where there were women with make-up on, smiling, skiing and appeared to be having a great time. There weren't any soldiers standing on the side lines everywhere ready to behead the women if they looked at a man that wasn't their husband or something crazy like that. There were kids playing in the streets and they didn't look oppressed either. The Americans were also greeted very warmly by the Iranians, taking smiling pictures, etc.. I'm not going to bat for Iran, but am merely informing you of what my impression is on the country of Iran from the view of an unbiased documentary that had absolutely no ulterior motives to pursuade the American public into believing that everyone in the country of Iran are American hating Islamic extremists that would like to chop off our heads and kick them down the road like a soccer ball. Don't believe everything you see or read presented by the media without first doing your own research. Otherwise you may turn out to be a puppet person.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

:Cowboy:

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=CHiEF_N]I know this may sound like it's completely off topic, but I have a passion for snowboarding and skiing. I watched this documentary by Warren Miller called Cold Fusion..............................................Otherwise you may turn out to be a puppet person.[/quote]

that documentary has nothing to do with thier government or political and social views. this is the man who quite literally just 3 weeks ago was hosting hezzbollah leadership, covertly sent his own military minister into lebanon to aid them, and in the last calander year has called for the destruction of jews multiple times... no, my opinion of him isnt going to change. mind you, this is a guy who attacked an embassy.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=thesightless]that documentary has nothing to do with thier government or political and social views.[/quote]

Very true, it didn't. It was just a shock to my preconceived notions that the Iranian people weren't all American hating, Islamic extremists living under a severely oppressive government.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

wat a surprise....i hope this makes you more critical and sceptical about your other assumed beliefs....they feed us such bulshit man....

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

well well am from lebanon and the only thing that depressed me that moshic is from israel and he cant come to leb.....( fuck wars, no one gona win .) peace all over da world.

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

I love it when 2 year old posts make a comeback!!

Re: 16 civilians and 20 soldiers..vs. 357 officially killed

[quote=runningman;639162]I love it when 2 year old posts make a comeback!![/quote]

no, it's feckin retarded. i don't know why people do this.