Re: Netherlands madness
Sickening shit IMO, and I mosty agree with Xessex - all the proposed changes are solely in the interest of those sick fucks that wish to create a legal opportunity to stick their dicks in kids under 16.
Checking their website now, and their use of the word 'diversity' is a rape of it's meaning. This means anything out of the social middle should be acceptable, even characteristics that are extremely dangerous to groups or individuals in our society: until now we've had law to protect us from those extremes, but now they're actually convening to stretch that law and in that sense expose the public to their presence.
Typical:
[I]We recently acquired a show on Mercurysessions with the name 'Sapere Aude', (-Horatio) which means 'think for yourself', but I just saw it is the motto of that political party as well. To avoid any connection I'd like the show hosts to consider changing the show title, unless people here really don't have a problem with it. But the banner colour and the name remind me of those bastards a little too much to be honest...[/I]
A few points concerning their sexuality agenda:
[quote] 9.2 Jongeren mogen vanaf twaalf jaar seksuele contacten aangaan.
Jongeren mogen sinds 2002 seksuele contacten aangaan vanaf zestien jaar. V??r 2002 mochten zij dit onder voorwaarden vanaf twaalf jaar. Jongeren laten zich niet beschermen als ze dat niet willen: jongeren geven aan dat ze zelf willen kunnen bepalen met wie ze seksuele contacten aangaan. De NVD wil op den duur deze leeftijdsgrens helemaal afschaffen. De reden hiervoor is dat alleen misbruik, zoals afgedwongen contacten, moet worden bestraft. Bij afhankelijkheidsrelaties, bijvoorbeeld tussen docent en leerling en bij incest, zal voorlopig een leeftijdsgrens van zestien jaar gaan gelden.[/quote]
Dangerous: sexual contact is legal from the age of 12, but only if it is consensual. Dependency or forced sexual relations are still forbidden. The problem here is not the age, but that most paedophiles claim that a sexual relationship was consensual! That is always their prime argument, and if this kind of legislation takes effect it will greatly hamper any legal charges made against a child assailant ? the law is not protecting the child by default anymore, now it?s up to the plaintiff to prove it wasn?t consensual as it is for the accused to prove that it was. In the long run, the political party wants to get rid of this age limit completely?.now how the hell is a 3-yr old kid supposed to consciously engage in any sexual activity huh? Combine this wit article 9.5 and 9.8 and you?ve got the recipe for uncontrolled child abuse.
[quote] 9.5 Vanaf zestien jaar mag men in een pornoproductie verschijnen.
De NVD wil op den duur dat jongeren vanaf het moment dat zij seksuele contacten mogen aangaan, ook in een pornoproductie mogen verschijnen als zij dit graag willen.[/quote]
From the age of 16 one can appear in a porn-production. But what rest of the article says is: people should be allowed to appear in porn productions as soon they are legally permitted to engage in sexual activity!! Think of this when realizing they want to lower that limit to 12 yrs and want to scrap it completely in the long run?.
[quote]9.7 Iedereen mag buiten naakt rondlopen.
Er zijn geen gegronde redenen om dit niet toe te staan. Wegens de hygi?ne moeten naaktlopers wel een handdoek gebruiken als zij gaan zitten op openbare zitplaatsen in bijvoorbeeld parken of op stations.[/quote]
Walking around naked in public should be legal.
Nope. Some people are just too damn ugly for that, not to mention that this will simply legalize exhibitionism from people that enjoy showing their genitals to unsuspecting bystanders. Keep that stuff to yourself please, and if you do show your willy to me be prepared to take one in the crotch. I call it a violation of my personal integrity if I?m forced to see stuff like that.
[quote]9.8 Priv?-bezit van kinderpornografie wordt toegestaan.
Tot 1998 was dit in Nederland het geval. De meeste politici wilden geen heksenjacht ontketenen. Hiervan is nu duidelijk wel sprake en dit levert niets op. Een verbod op bezit van kinderporno is censuur. Tevens ontstaan er allerlei illegale, oncontroleerbare circuits door. Geld verdienen door (ruil)handel blijft voorlopig wel strafbaar. Zie ook punt 9.5.[/quote]
SAY WHAT?? Private child porn collections should be legal??
I don?t think so ? for the production of those video?s numerous children?s lives have been ruined forever, just so you Mr. Pedophile van have your 5 minutes of enjoyment. Fuck you. If you want to give your (probably very small) willy a quick tug, use your imagination or adult porn, porn that doesn?t destroy lives and scar kids for life. To me this proposal is equal to encouraging child abuse/molestation/exploitation. This alone should get any member of that political party in jail.
[quote]9.10 Seksuele contacten met dieren blijven legaal.
Seksuele mishandeling van dieren blijft strafbaar.[/quote]
Sexual contact with animals will remain legal. Abuse will remain illegal. Sure. Go get assraped by a horse, I hope it rips up your intestines real bad. Have fun shitting blood.
[COLOR="Orange"]Points 9.2, 9.5 and 9.8 together form a framework that will, if implemented, lead to legalization of child porn. These motherf__kers should be in jail IMO, nothing less. Especially the sick minds that have spent hours or days formulating this sickening programme.[/COLOR]