Re: Alito confirmation hearings -- Democrats disgust me
Snore.... apparently we're blind to recent history.
Last time I checked Republicans used the system to block dozens of Clinton nominations, which, by the way were conveniently left for George W. Bush to fill.
The GOP was particularly zealous in blocking appointments to appeals courts, which, in case some of you don't know, actually decide matters of law.
Fast forward to today and our jolly Republicans are painting the Bush administration as the victim of Democratic partisanship. I find this interesting because to a far greater degree than the Democrats who controlled the Senate during six of the Reagan-Bush I years, the Republican Senate went to ridiculous lengths to keep Clinton from appointing even moderate judges, especially to appeals courts.
The Republican Congress also refused to create new judgeships necessary to handle an expanding population and caseload.
Fact: Under President Carter, 152 additional federal judgeships were created. Reagan and Bush each got 85, Clinton just nine... NINE.
Under Reagan and Bush, the Senate (then controlled by Democrats) typically approved presidential nominations to the appellate bench within three to four months.
When the roles were reversed and Republican senators were in charge, the average delay rose to more than seven months in Clinton's second term and 280 days in Clinton's last two years. By the end of the Clinton presidency the Senate had confirmed only 39 of 81 pending judicial nominees and just eight to appeals courts. Forty-two were left to lapse.
This happens year in and year out no matter who controls the majority in Senate.....
And in case you're wondering I'm a moderate... socially liberal and fiscally conservative.