Re: The most racially tolerant countries
Further insight from an Ethnic Conflict Professor... this made sense to me:[URL="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/17/5-insights-on-the-racial-tolerance-and-ethnicity-maps-from-an-ethnic-conflict-professor/"]
5 insights on the racial tolerance and ethnicity maps, from an ethnic conflict professor - The Washington Post[/URL]
[COLOR=#d3d3d3][QUOTE][FONT=Georgia]Saideman offers this: "In societies that have very little diversity, there is no opportunity for [ethnic] violence. For societies where there is a great deal, there is no threat of dominance. But in places where there are a few groups that rival each other, then the threats they pose to each other or at least one to the others can be severe. Ethnic violence may not be about fractionalization/diversity but about polarization."[/FONT][/QUOTE]
[/COLOR][COLOR=#d3d3d3][SIZE=2][QUOTE]B[/B][/QUOTE][/SIZE][/COLOR][QUOTE][COLOR=#a9a9a9][SIZE=2][B] Ethnic conflict comes from "concentration," not "fractionalization."[/B][/SIZE][/COLOR][COLOR=#d3d3d3][SIZE=2][FONT=Georgia] Here's where Saideman really shows off his expertise. "The one consistent finding for ethnic conflict is not about fractionalization but about group concentration," he writes. "That where ethnic groups have distinct areas apart from each other within a country, there is more conflict. Why? Well, partly because it facilitates separatism. Partly because groups that are separate have a secure base from which to launch attacks. Partly because intermingled groups may be deterred from attacking since they themselves are vulnerable (kind of like mutual assured destruction)."[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/QUOTE][COLOR=#d3d3d3]
[/COLOR]