lol.

Re: Benghazi

Romney tried to make this into 9/11 part two during the debates. That didn't go so well.

Re: Benghazi

Benghazi

lol.

I seriously thought it could not get any worse than the gun running scandal dubbed Fast and Furious.

But leave it to a bunch of D.C. retards to fuck up an easy call to send backup.

lol

Obama will surely repeat on the Nobel Peace Prize for this one!

i think the drone attacks happening all around the world will push him over the top!

[QUOTE="88Mariner;1066570"]Benghazi

lol.

I seriously thought it could not get any worse than the gun running scandal dubbed Fast and Furious.

But leave it to a bunch of D.C. retards to fuck up an easy call to send backup.

lol

Obama will surely repeat on the Nobel Peace Prize for this one!

i think the drone attacks happening all around the world will push him over the top![/QUOTE]

I wonder if he will increase the number of drone strikes when he is in office the next four years just to embarrass the Nobel committee.

Re: Benghazi

I kinda actually hope Obama gets re-elected to see him go down in flames over Benghazi.

Because the media can only suppress the facts on Benghazi for so long before the dam bursts.

Re: Benghazi

Kind of like all of the impeachments that went down Watergate style over the huge Fast and Furious scandal? lulz.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/eYwtZ.gif[/IMG]

Re: Benghazi

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;1066615]Kind of like all of the impeachments that went down Watergate style over the huge Fast and Furious scandal? lulz.

[/QUOTE]

I feel great contempt towards those who childishly pretend that the lives lost in Benghazi are insignificant, and the same towards those who sheepishly say that all the innocents who died by the guns trafficked into violent drug cartels in Mexico was a non-story.

And I am disgusted by those who fail to understand the clear distinction between these scandals: Nobody died during Watergate.

What a massive disrespect for human life.

Please, continue with your praise towards the kill-list writing, drone-bombing menace in the white house.

The sane will wait patiently until you get tuckered out.

Re: Benghazi

The Repbus don't give a shit about the people who died or where it happened, it is just an opportunity to try and make the White House look bad so they can score some points to try and get back in the Oval Office. That is the real problem I have with the Benghazi and Fast and Furious "outrage".

If this wasn't election time they would still be reading up on Wikipedia where the hell Benghazi is and also who the president of Mexico is right now.

Re: Benghazi

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;1067108]The Repbus don't give a shit about the people who died or where it happened, it is just an opportunity to try and make the White House look bad so they can score some points to try and get back in the Oval Office. That is the real problem I have with the Benghazi and Fast and Furious "outrage".

If this wasn't election time they would still be reading up on Wikipedia where the hell Benghazi is and also who the president of Mexico is right now.[/QUOTE]

If "[t]he Repubs don't give a shit about the people who died or where it happened" then President Obama and his Administration evidently are more indifferent. Because, as we are finding out, they were watching it in [I]real time[/I], sent nobody to help, pretty much left them there to die.

Recieve notice that there are multiple terrorist groups including AQ operating in the area?

[I]No need for any security[/I].

Request incoming for additional protection?

[I]Delete and empty trash[/I].

Military aircraft overhead? [I]

Do nothing[/I].

Military servicemen and contractors in the area? [I]

Do nothing[/I].

Gunships in the area? [I]

Don't bother sending them.[/I]

Please, remind everyone here who doesn't care about who?

I feel utter contempt for someone who thinks it [I]actually makes a difference[/I] where on this globe this was allowed to happen almost as much as I feel contempt for the members of President Obama's administration who claimed it "was because of a youtube movie.'

Either you are going to stop complaining about those asking for transparency over what transpired in Benghazi or you're going to have to continue excusing the major fuck up that happened on the watch of President Obama's administration.

You can't have it both ways.

People [I]died[/I].

And all you can do is pout about Republicans.

Such a goddamned child.

Re: Benghazi

Black Jesus couldn't make Seal Team 6 appear within a couple of hours and kill all the bad bearded men.

Also see the video of him making a speech on sept 12th saying it was terrorism. That little clip bit Mitt in the balls on debate nite. Also we should stop using the word terrorism for everything. All it does is just sell more guns and planes and keep scared white people from visiting NYC.

Re: Benghazi

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;1067393]Black Jesus couldn't make Seal Team 6 appear within a couple of hours and kill all the bad bearded men.

Also see the video of him making a speech on sept 12th saying it was terrorism. That little clip bit Mitt in the balls on debate nite. Also we should stop using the word terrorism for everything. All it does is just sell more guns and planes and keep scared white people from visiting NYC.[/QUOTE]

Obama did not call the Benghazi attack an "act of terror" during the Rose Garden speech on 9/12/12. In that portion of the speech, he was referencing the attacks of 9/11/2001. This was obvious to me when I watched his speech on TV in real-time. Furthermore, this is supported by the following facts coming after that speech:

Hillary Clinton making statements linking the attacks to protests about the YouTube video Jay Carney making numerous statements saying the same. UN Ambassador making the same statements on 5 Sunday news programs. Obama making the same statements to the UN.

When his aides were in a frenzy to find cover for their YouTube video protest excuse falling apart, they scoured over the transcripts from 9/11/12 and onward to find ANYTHING they could to hide behind. And so they latched onto those 3 words spoken about the 9/11/01 terror attacks, and have mislead everyone by claiming Obama was referencing Benghazi.

Re: Benghazi

[video=youtube;3Nu6VZ9DeVc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=3Nu6VZ9DeVc#![/video]

Re: Benghazi

Thank you for the video. It supports two points:

1. The mention of rejecting the denigration of religious beliefs was directed at the YouTube video.

2. He was making a general reference to the 9/11/01 attacks as "acts of terror" and not labelling the Benghazi event as claimed in the second debate.

[QUOTE="subterFUSE;1067454"]Thank you for the video. It supports two points:

1. The mention of rejecting the denigration of religious beliefs was directed at the YouTube video.

2. He was making a general reference to the 9/11/01 attacks as "acts of terror" and not labelling the Benghazi event as claimed in the second debate.[/QUOTE]

I think it could be interpreted either way based on what side of the story you feel like siding with.

Re: Benghazi

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;1067574]I think it could be interpreted either way based on what side of the story you feel like siding with.[/QUOTE]

I don't really see how, but have it your way, dude. ;)

3 days until Romney wins this thing.

[QUOTE="subterFUSE;1067593"]

I don't really see how, but have it your way, dude. ;)

3 days until Romney wins this thing.[/QUOTE]

Doesn't sound too cut and dry to me. Also Nate Silver has Obama at an 82% chance of winning as of today. He is using statistics and not any gut feeling crap and says the media portrayal of the race being neck and neck is way off base. Read the five thirty eight blog he writes for more info.

[url="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/"]Election Forecasts - FiveThirtyEight Blog - NYTimes.com[/url]

Re: Benghazi

Yes, I've seen that one.

The part I am not certain about is the methodology of the polling. In particular, whether or not the polls have been using the 2008 voter turnout model. 2008 saw record turnout levels among minorities, and a relatively muted enthusiasm from conservatives about McCain. If the polls are using 2008 turnout for their samples now, then I believe there will be an oversampling of democrats.

So I'm not arguing against the statistical analysis of the Electoral map you posted.... but rather the polls in the individual states which he is using to create the analysis. If those polls are wrong, then it skews the entire analysis.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that this election is going to have a result that leaves many of these pollsters scratching their heads.

Re: Benghazi

Here is some good discussion and articles about that blog if you feel like reading about it more: [url="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4736736"]Why political journalists can’t stand Nate Silver | Hacker News[/url]

Re: Benghazi

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;1067393]Black Jesus couldn't make Seal Team 6 appear within a couple of hours and kill all the bad bearded men.

Also see the video of him making a speech on sept 12th saying it was terrorism. That little clip bit Mitt in the balls on debate nite. Also we should stop using the word terrorism for everything. All it does is just sell more guns and planes and keep scared white people from visiting NYC.[/QUOTE]

hahahahahahahahahah no person who has followed this story would ever recognize your incredibly imaginative misunderstanding of his rose garden speech. Did it bite Mitt in the balls? No. It made Team Obama and Crowly look ridiculous. Who thought it hurt Mitt the most?

The ones who were not paying attention. Or, maybe the ones who must pretend something else happened.

So you were either not paying attention or you're just still playing pretend.

I know you're not getting any kickbacks for attempting to pave over this graveyard, so why do it? Why pretend that 'something' transpired other than what [I]actually happened[/I]?

My only guess is your mental fragility. Not because you're stupid, but because if you [I]did[/I] admit what [I]actually [/I]happened [I]happened[/I], then you'd realize you were the very person you love to criticize because it makes you [I]feel[/I] as if you are intellectually superior - and that person is the ignorant fool.

This alternative reality you have managed to create in your mind is so devoid of any factual basis that anyone reading your comments could only assume your ego is so fragile that you [I]must[/I] play this head game with yourself, to the point we might actually feel a bit of pity towards your condition.

It must be cognitively easier for your to feel that there was no need to send assistance to an Ambassador, American servicemen, and an American Embassy since they presumptively would not have arrived in time .......... than it would be to think that dispatching any and all help in the area would be of paramount importance regardless of when the help would arrive.

You call the terrorists 'bad bearded men' when you don't actually believe that. You minimize their actions and start attacking - like a cornered dog - white people (?) who apparently are scared of visiting NYC (another mental creation of yours). You're not concerned with the actions of legitimate terrorist organizations no more than you are concerned with the facts. Your concern is not with the perpetrators of this violent act against Americans - your concern is with white people who are not playing along with you in your mental sandbox.

Succinctly: you are concerned only with reinforcing your ego against the reality that could fracture it. Build your little sand castles, make believe all you want, but the natural elements will weather it away in the end.

Maintaining your alternative reality is surely a Sisyphean task, that at some point there won't be enough lubrication to keep the illusion generator running and the cogs will lock up.

In the mean time, maybe I can assist with your delusions?

Repeat after me: "There is no terrorism. Only workplace violence."

Or try this one: "Terrorists aren't violent, they're passionate."

don't you have a color by numbers book to be working on for extra credit right now?

I didn't know every act if violence in the Mideast now days is via some terrorist group. Sounds a bit outlandish to me. As I said this is a huge blow up with Romney now not because he actually cares about who died, but trying to use it as a talking point to get elected.

Re: Benghazi

[QUOTE=res0nat0r;1067743]I didn't know every act if violence in the Mideast now days is via some terrorist group. Sounds a bit outlandish to me. As I said this is a huge blow up with Romney now not because he actually cares about who died, but trying to use it as a talking point to get elected.[/QUOTE]

So we get pretend land again.

Yes, we heard you the first time.

Romney doesn't care about who died - he only cares about getting re-elected = bad

Obama doesn't care about who died on his watch - nor should anybody else because he needs to be re-elected = good

yawn

[QUOTE="88Mariner;1067745"]

So we get pretend land again.

Yes, we heard you the first time.

Romney doesn't care about who died - he only cares about getting re-elected = bad

Obama doesn't care about who died on his watch - nor should anybody else because he needs to be re-elected = good

yawn[/QUOTE]

Maybe it isn't that black and white? I'd like to know how the reports of violence etc stacked up against the reports from the region from every day of the year prior? Maybe the report was exactly the same as it had been for the past months without any actual issues? Maybe this report was insignificant vs prior months? Maybe it was a huge glaring red flag? Those small things might be nice to know...

Re: Benghazi

[video=youtube;PbUz3pIPmTY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbUz3pIPmTY[/video]

lulz

Re: Benghazi

Did anyone hear about the thousands that marched in Libya to show anger at the attacks? A Dutch radio journalist talked about it recently.

Also cross Libya off the list of nations that doesn't have a reserve bank.

Re: Benghazi

[quote]Also cross Libya off the list of nations that doesn't have a reserve bank.[/quote] Why do you think the king was unilaterally able to pledge Military involvement without congressional approval?

Also, anyone who thinks this coordinated attack suddenly resulted from a video that negatively depicted Mohammad has fried their brains from too much MessNBC and other similar Pravda-like propaganda. Rand Paul just put Hilary in her place last week, giving her a proper grilling about her incompetence in this fiasco.

Re: Benghazi

^No one but morons think the video had anything to do with it anymore...Also Rand Paul looked like a moron asking about weapons to Turkey. He admitted the next day on the radio he didnt have any evidence of anything about it, he just heard the #1 idiot Glenn Beck talk about it and then brought it up. Fail.

Re: Benghazi

Back to Qadaffi, wasnt he making plans to only trade in gold with other nations?