This relates to the question of eligibility and whether the usurper's name is even qualified to be placed on the ballot after damning evidence has surfaced over the past three years:
[url]http://www.thepostemail.com/2011/11/18/exclusive-orly-taitz-reports-on-new-hampshire-ballot-commission-hearing/[/url]
The only argument the assistant attorney general could bring against the evidence brought forth regarding the fake Social Security # and alleged forged BC was this:
[quote]“Well, did Obama fill out the paper?” “Yes.” “Did he pay the $1,000 fee? “Yes.” “OK, here’s my case.”[/quote]
The 100-strong crowd rightly lambasted these corrupt officials with a dose of "treason!" and a side of "traitors!"