Re: US '13 days from financial disaster'
Wow, so under an administration that will have spent more than all previous Presidents combined by the end of the first (and hopefully last) term, the [URL="http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/djdb.php?id=969"]blame[/URL] is somehow squarely in the Republicans' court. Typical but not surprising from (some of) the group here. And pay no attention to the trillion-dollar budget-busting so-called healthcare "reform" passed last year by the guy you believe wants to save the economy, which has done nothing to reign in prices and will finish off cash-strapped states already flirting with bankruptcy thanks to the massive number of new Medicaid enrollees. Are you even aware that HCR as it is written requires cuts be made to Medicare? Where's the outrage?
And Stephen, at which percentage of total taxes paid (currently at [URL="http://politisite.com/2011/07/03/guess-who-really-pays-the-taxes"]>50%[/URL]) will you be satisfied that the rich have been milked enough? Generally, they have the resources to evade sinking ships...the rest of us, not so much.
[IMG]http://politisite.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Guess-Who-Really-Pays-the-Taxes.jpg[/IMG]
Nevermind, we're doomed already. Class warfare and eat the rich mantras will lead this country to an even darker place than it already is. I don't disagree with tax loophole and subsidy elimination, for the record.
Even on the surface, with a giant like GE who seemingly got away without paying taxes during the last period, peer deeper into their financials and one can see their consumer finance division took a massive beating. All the more reason tax code simplification should also be a major aim, even if that's a flat tax, elimination of exemptions, etc.
I also love how you're slamming Repubs and their rich buddies yet ignoring an important part of the article quoted above:
[quote]Backed by Wall Street but facing deadlock in Washington[/quote]
Come on, dude, "backed by Wall Street" (the very consortium of fools who were in part responsible for the crash of 2008). To think either party is free from the sphere of influence of big business is giving in to propaganda.
Finally, I didn't even mention how 0bama, knowing the fragility of the economy, unilaterally decided we should be involved in "kinetic nonhostile military action" in Libya, a country who didn't even so much as verbally threaten the US. A spineless Republican't party merely gave a verbal rebuke, while we continue to throw borrowed IOUs down a snake pit.
The blame Republican routine from you lefties is getting tiresome...it's a shared disaster now, and only the authentic Tea Party types (and Ron Paul) seem to understand what must be done to salvage the wreckage, and that's not to become even greater slaves to debt. This is what 0bama's plans amount to, so in a sense, Mitch is correct about defeating our dictator-lite.
And really, picking "on the blacks and Mexicans." Which party keeps the former subservient by encouraging them to stay in the welfare state, and which party claims the loudest race baiters (Sheilah Jackson, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton to name but three)? On the second ethnicity you referenced, you are forgetting that a large majority of AMERICANS (both Dems and Repubs) are fed up with the illegal immigration problem in this country and are opposed to defacto amnesty.
I don't know why I bother.