HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / Movies / TV

The A Team - slightly smarter than last year's GI Joe

6 durable postsStarted 2010-06-11Latest 2010-06-15
#84431Post 1 of 6

Only slightly. You could watch the movie The Losers which came out this year and be slightly more entertained.

If you want to watch a movie with zero plot, character and sense of realistic physics, the remake ain't half bad. Liam Neeson is no George Peppard, Rampage Jackson is even less so having the thankless job of trying to fill the shoes of Mr. T and Bradley Cooper walks around with his shirt off, flexing his abs whenever he can. Sharlto Copley (the main guy from District 9) is the only guy that actually manages to make the movie memorable. The story pretty much doesn't make much sense other than they're trying to clear their name for a counterfeiting ring that they got pegged with.

It's cocky as all fuck - it's a frat boy attituded action film. If you can swallow them landing a falling tank from a cargo plane by shooting the main cannon as a means of softening their landing, you'll enjoy it.

#1380329Post 2 of 6

Re: The A Team - slightly smarter than last year's GI Joe

HEY I liked G.I. - JOE :)

#1380497Post 3 of 6

Re: The A Team - slightly smarter than last year's GI Joe

bleh

#1380510Post 4 of 6

Re: The A Team - slightly smarter than last year's GI Joe

You couldn't pay me (less than $100) to watch this movie :lol:

#1380635Post 5 of 6

Re: The A Team - slightly smarter than last year's GI Joe

Well that makes absolute sense to me.

#1380952Post 6 of 6

Re: The A Team - slightly smarter than last year's GI Joe

hahaha I dont look for realism in these movies, most action shots are pretty unrealistic, just take it as silly entertainment and then you can enjoy it... I didnt mind Bradley Cooper walking around with his shirt off ;)

Log in to reply