Anyone seen this one? I think it was moderate. There was not much focus on either the time before the island, the time at the island and the time after..

The adjustmenbt to normal life went pretty easy...

Although the movie is 2 hours plus and has TOm Hanks all over it, I don't think it showed much character development But yeah what would you think about a Robinson Crusoe kind of movie when someone only speaks to attributes

Thought it was pretty good,did drag on a bit though.

I swear I remember reading an interview with a lady who actually was shipwrecked for years,who said it was way harder to survive than the film showed,and that zemeckis hadnt really got to the bottom of the actual trauma that she experienced.

I think I saw this in the theaters when it came out... I give it a B for the good acting. The movie was well-done, but it just got boring at times. It would've been better with more talking to himself or something

I disagree, I couldn't find anything interesting in this film: simple-minded story with poor acting...

i wanted to see him bang the angel lady at the end.

I thought the movie was OK, very slow at times, but i did think that the ending was garbage.....would think that you would have a more difficult time adjusting when you made it back home!!!

decent movie. bad ending. want refund.

i thought the movie was real good and that tom hanks should've won an oscar that year instead of russell for gladiator , but the ending blew ball , very bad

Re: Cast Away

[quote=Roderik_London].....I don't think it showed much character development [/quote]

You did watch the movie right?? hank's character does a complete 180 from who he was at the beggining... :?:

i still say the movie should have come with a rebate. :roll:

And a limited edition 'Wilson' (blood not included)