Is this an inestable Bond? I was very happy because Universal gave us a new concept of spy films, with mental troubles (trying to found himself), no special weapons (except available now in market) & with time for love. Now, we have the second Bourne film, a revenge movie, that I expect lead a new group of character based movies. Watch the film & comment this new choice.
[ms] · Est. May 2002
Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...
One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.
Bourne
Both Bourne movies just dont do it for me
They're not James Bond, and they aren't Mission Impossible, they're just a cheap version of both.
Plus I have a serious disliking for Matt Damon
the first film was pretty good, and i liked the story. and Matt is good with acting in a fight, so movie has good action scenes.
But the second one is awful, too much camera shaking in action parts, so u cant see a shit, the story sucks, but i think it has one of the longest car chase scene in the end.
everything together, mediocre action film which will never reach our 007, or something like that.
I like the "smarts" behind the character. how he gets into shit and gets out of it.
my fav part.
I'm sure that Bond can't be surpassed, He's essential!!! But this confused assasin, "created" by the CIA, with medical & psychological troubles give us a new genre of spy/assasin movies. This film isn't the best spy film, but I can say that Universal gave us a brand new choice, just follow it and think about how real could it be.
Re: Bourne
remind me this movie wuth jean claud.....cyborgs or something like that....dont know why....
[quote=cruisysloth]
They're not James Bond, and they aren't Mission Impossible, they're just a cheap version of both.
[/quote]
As far as Im concerned Bond's been dead for years and should try and take a leaf out of the Bourne book, cracking films with characters and plots, all Bond is these days is unbelievable BOLLOCKS about some nutcase trying to destroy the world with as many explosions, stunts and any other stupids ideas they can come up with, crammed into 90mins!
Goldeneye was last decent Bond and I couldn't even tell you what's been released since then, but saw the trailer for the last one with ICE castles and the flipping of Aston Vanquish scene and just refused to watch it!
Lets hope QT gets his hands on it and rescues them before its too late, with a Bond story like good old days of Sean Connery :(
[quote=cruisysloth]Both Bourne movies just dont do it for me
They're not James Bond, and they aren't Mission Impossible, they're just a cheap version of both.
Plus I have a serious disliking for Matt Damon[/quote]
wow, the 1st flick was boring but part 2 was way better, For you too say that its a cheap version of MI and Bond flicks is beyond me. I like bond flicks they are just getting old how many times do we have to see some suave british guy score the good looking chick and save the world at the same time. I mean really how many british guys are that smooth.
OK maybe except for Digweed's mixing skills thats smooth.
Re: Bourne
good movie, good second part....I think the second part was even better than the first