The Kong is back.. recently watched the old classic one... Can't wait to see Peter Jackson's version tomorrow :D Anyone else gonna check it out?

Re: King Kong

I'm very interested, this movie has a huge buzz going, the prerelease reviews have been through the roof.

Re: King Kong

mmm.....i see the trailer and dont see anithing good.

Re: King Kong

I can't wait to see this! They used the same technology as they did making Gollum in LOTR.....should be really neat to see how it all came together

Re: King Kong

Reviews thus far have been really good, i plan to take my girl friend to see it upon here arrival from europe ;)

Re: King Kong

Sure gonnna check it out!

Re: King Kong

I think it?s gonna be a great movie. I still can?t accept the Tiranosaurius Rex...whatever

Re: King Kong

comes out tommorow, cant wait to see it (will probably wait for the rush to die down or at least catch a LATE show to avoid kids)

Re: King Kong

am i the only one who thinks this film looks fucking lame?

Re: King Kong

Probably not.

I for one can't wait for it though.

Re: King Kong

[quote=anonin]am i the only one who thinks this film looks fucking lame?[/quote]

I'm not sure what to think of it... King Kong? Godzilla? Anaconda? man it doesn't interest me... but I keep hearing this one will be nice

Re: King Kong

i think it looks fucking awesome... and the reviews (if you take anything from them, which i usually dont) are very very good too.

Re: King Kong

ill probably go see it because of the rave reviews, watch this space :p

Re: King Kong

I just saw the trailer on the more than busy server... looks totally computerised if you ask me... I'm not sure if I want to see it, but on the other hand.... ;)

Re: King Kong

ill def. be getting very ripped before i roll in the theatre :p

Re: King Kong

I was actually surprised at how good it was, and how quickly the 3 hours and 7 minutes moved along. Some genuinely terrifying moments on Skull Island and the film as a whole is a great, epic film. I have some minor beefs, like Jack Black being kind of unstable in the film (sometimes he evokes a look that reminds me too much of School of Rock, others, he's escaped into the character). The ending is so well done and amazingly faithful to the original, it's one of those really really rare film that manages to eclipse the original because it's so damn good.

Re: King Kong

The movie seems to be interesting thought classic never dies!!!

Re: King Kong

fantastic movie. bring a snack and take a piss before you go in, though...its looooong.

Re: King Kong

So. fucking. long. Seriously, first half seems to drag on so much, should have been cut down. Last hour moves along nicely though. Overall good, but too long.

Re: King Kong

im checking it tonite, lets wait.

Re: King Kong

[quote=el presidente Highsteppa]I was actually surprised at how good it was, and how quickly the 3 hours and 7 minutes moved along. [/quote]

man, 3 hours and 7 minutes don't just move along, it takes hours! :D Oh well, at least it's not one of those 85 minute movies...

Re: King Kong

3 hours is long, but those were the shortest 3 hours of my life... do i want them back? maybe

Re: King Kong

I wish I loved this movie as much as everyone else - I really wanted to going in...

The LOTR movies were just incredible! So epic and refreshing.

King Kong on the other hand was lame. The setup to the arrival on the island dragged on and on and on... and the acting was so poor and cheap. Jack Black, in my opinion, sucked leaky nipples.

There were just too many over the top moments. A few of these moments would have made the movie memorable - but having a giant special fx saturated scene every five minutes was too much - it was as if I built a tolerance to them throughout the movie and they were no longer a big deal every time they happened.

Some of the special effects were mind-blowing... other scenes looked like leftover footage from LOTR or Jurrasic Park.

Seems to me like Peter Jackson got too carried away trying to turn King Kong into the most epic story every told, which was not necessary and, for me, severly detracted from the movie.

Re: King Kong

I feel like the 3 hours went rather quickly, thourh definately go to the washroom beforehand!

The movie itself felt like it had alot more of a fleshed out story than the original. More detail into what happened on Skull Island, and I was on the edge of my seat the whole time! Yes, it was long, but every minute was a genuine movie experience. Jack Black was the only one who I agree was sketchy at times in the acting department. The boat captain reminded me of Harrison Ford as Indy! Anyway, I feel it deserves it great reviews since I initially wasn't going to see it.

I was one of the converted, though obviously if you aregoing in and comparing it to LOTR then you are already decided in your mind because that is the greatest Epic trilogy we will ever see. That is unfair comparison, and Kong is only one movie versus a trilogy.

Greg (First Post!!!)

Re: King Kong

[quote=Balearic Boy Greg] I was one of the converted, though obviously if you aregoing in and comparing it to LOTR then you are already decided in your mind because that is the greatest Epic trilogy we will ever see. That is unfair comparison, and Kong is only one movie versus a trilogy.

Greg (First Post!!!)[/quote]

Hey Greg - good points raised :)

However, I'm not comparing King Kong to LOTR in that KK did not live up to LOTR. What I'm saying is that they had too much in common... I wished that they weren't so similar in their "epicness" - I'm not saying that King Kong should have been more like LOTR, but rather the opposite.

cheers!

Re: King Kong

I gotcha man. I actually didn't mean you, but some others mentioned it being too long. That he was trying to make it too Epic. But if you watch the original Kong, lets be honest.....it is light on plot (other than the fundamantal Beast meets Beauty and the heart of the Beast is tamed as he finds meaning in his lonely existence and can die happy theme), so now Jackson has fleshed it out. I just found it interestiing that people thought Jackson was purposely drawing things out for his own ego (to make his single movie an epic).

It is also worth mentioning here that Kong was originally about 2 hours. Then, after Universal execs saw this first version, they were so impressed with the effects and storyline, that they actually okayed another hour to be added from cut footage.

To me the most important part of the film is Skull Island because it is the reference for everything. I was glad to see it fleshed out, and I love how we get a more realiztic glimpse than ever of what prehistoric life was like. ie.> heard animals like Brontasauraus just struggling to survive and falling in the pursuit, and all the predator and then a bigger predator life cycle. I mention this because I feel since people are bringing up Jurrasic Park, Kong makes this aspect of Jurassic Park look pretty juvenille and succeeds in transporting us back (minus the people and giant ape of course).

Anyway, I want to make clear one more thing. People who are saying it is too much like Jurasssic Park...do you realize that the original Kong had a Prehistoric element on Skull Island. It is a given that the effect were not here to do T-Rex battles with Kong, yet had the technology been there, they would have put more in. So considering this (and the fact that Kong came out waaaay b4 Jurassic Park), we can hardly claim that showing dinosaurs on Skull Island along with Kong is something that detracts from the movie or in some way makes Kong too 'Jurassic Parkish'.

Just a thought I had, Regards, Greg

Re: King Kong

this is the best special effect i have ever seen in any movie ever period. What a kick ass film. A must see at the big screen.

Re: King Kong

[quote=Balearic Boy Greg]I gotcha man. I actually didn't mean you, but some others mentioned it being too long. That he was trying to make it too Epic. But if you watch the original Kong, lets be honest.....it is light on plot (other than the fundamantal Beast meets Beauty and the heart of the Beast is tamed as he finds meaning in his lonely existence and can die happy theme), so now Jackson has fleshed it out. I just found it interestiing that people thought Jackson was purposely drawing things out for his own ego (to make his single movie an epic).

It is also worth mentioning here that Kong was originally about 2 hours. Then, after Universal execs saw this first version, they were so impressed with the effects and storyline, that they actually okayed another hour to be added from cut footage.

To me the most important part of the film is Skull Island because it is the reference for everything. I was glad to see it fleshed out, and I love how we get a more realiztic glimpse than ever of what prehistoric life was like. ie.> heard animals like Brontasauraus just struggling to survive and falling in the pursuit, and all the predator and then a bigger predator life cycle. I mention this because I feel since people are bringing up Jurrasic Park, Kong makes this aspect of Jurassic Park look pretty juvenille and succeeds in transporting us back (minus the people and giant ape of course).

Anyway, I want to make clear one more thing. People who are saying it is too much like Jurasssic Park...do you realize that the original Kong had a Prehistoric element on Skull Island. It is a given that the effect were not here to do T-Rex battles with Kong, yet had the technology been there, they would have put more in. So considering this (and the fact that Kong came out waaaay b4 Jurassic Park), we can hardly claim that showing dinosaurs on Skull Island along with Kong is something that detracts from the movie or in some way makes Kong too 'Jurassic Parkish'.

Just a thought I had, Regards, Greg[/quote]

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v396/secretnuance/holdoniaintreading.jpg[/IMG]

Re: King Kong

I went to see kong 2 days ago... it was way too long... nice effects yeah... but when I want effect I'll play Max Payne 2... those effects are better if you ask me :)

who hasn't seen computer effects on screen by now anyway...

Re: King Kong

[URL="http://movies.mercuryblogs.com/?p=11"]http://movies.mercuryblogs.com/?p=11[/URL]

Re: King Kong

fuck... the monkey dies again.

Re: King Kong

Finally watched it and I was a bit dissapointed. The Movie is not bad but I missed Jackson's fingerprints in it. I didn't see anything new besides some action sequences. The beginning takes way too much time (for me basically because the characters/actors are not interesting). 2 hours would have been enough IMO.

Re: King Kong

I really liked this movie....I thought it was really well done and the 3hrs flew by for me. I will admit I even cried at 2 different parts in the movie. I am really impressed with how they were able to put emotion behind Kong's eyes.

Re: King Kong

Kong Is King

'nuff said

Re: King Kong

[quote=hansh20]fuck... the monkey dies again.[/quote]

:CrackUp: .... what a perfect summary :lol: :lol:

Re: King Kong

Saw it...abso-fucking-lutely LOVED IT!!!

What a grand, epic, monster of a movie. The whole Skull Island part was more than I even could have imagined. Making the inhabitance more like the witchs off of the Beastmaster than African tribes..uhh...people was a killer touch. The part right before Kong appears, with all of the drums and dancing and chicks that looked like they were on 5 white Mitsubishis...it was all so overwhelming and intense. Then it switches to Kong playing with his new "toy" and laughing and shit. Peter Jackson really made it a point to humanize him as much as possible...and suceeded immensely.

I thought this movie had Jackson's print all over it. I actually thought it was a little too LOTRish at times. Like when they were crossing the bridge after Kong has made off with his girl...very familiar.

All in all an awesome movie. Did anyone else notice how almost half the movie is close-ups of Naomi Watts' face. Not saying that is a bad thing at all...not by a long shot, but interesting. And I'm not one bit ashamed to admit that I got a little teared up when Kong let go of the spire atop the Empire State building and fell to his death. How cool was the slo-mo part when he was falling?? And the last line always gets me..."Well at least the planes got him." "No...it was beauty that killed the beast." Classic!!!

Re: King Kong

5 pickles from the pickle

Re: King Kong

It was quite entertaining and very comedic at times too. It got way hokey but we all know the original so that's kind of self-explanatory. I loved the part with all of the insects but I wanted to see some gore there. And as for DuncingQueen, you ever heard of computer animation? :lol:

Re: King Kong

[quote=beanzncheez]It was quite entertaining and very comedic at times too. It got way hokey but we all know the original so that's kind of self-explanatory. I loved the part with all of the insects but I wanted to see some gore there. And as for DuncingQueen, you ever heard of computer animation? :lol:[/quote]

i thought you were going to say you wanted to see sexual scenes between kong and the girl.

Re: King Kong

Kong's eyes when he died at the end were fucking amazingly done, I fucking had tears streaming down my face big time....

I didnt like the whole stampede scene as the effects were done strangely and didnt recreate how people actually focus on objects with a realistic depth of field (objects going in and out of focus that shouldn't have changed considering their placement in front of or behind other objects etc) but otherwise I fucking loved it.

The people on skull island were fucking CREEPY.