HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / Movies / TV

The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

9 durable postsStarted 2011-07-23Latest 2013-07-30
#103997Post 1 of 9

[video=youtube;FWP8TdXdFZg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWP8TdXdFZg[/video]

#1527584Post 2 of 9

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

Isn't this part 1 again, just with a new Parker. This is getting fuckin ridiculous.

Marvel, GTFO!

#1527598Post 3 of 9

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

Yup, [url="http://www.mercuryserver.com/forums/djdb.php?id=260"]reboot[/url].

#1527609Post 4 of 9

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

bleh. spiderman sucks. no more spiderman movies for me anymore after part 2.

#1527714Post 5 of 9

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

I liked Pt 1 and 2, Pt 3 with X-men Pt 3 are the worst superhero flicks ever.

#1527938Post 6 of 9

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

spiderman 1 from 2002 was a really good movie (at least for a superhero movie), why do a new one 9 years later, i just dont get it. besides that the trailer looks crap, they just changed to mirrors edge camera style ^^

#1528435Post 7 of 9

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

which spiderman timeline is this again?? it has Gwen Stacy as his love interest instead of Mary Jane Watson

#1528473Post 8 of 9

Re: The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

It could be based on Ultimate Spider-man.

Anyway Gwen Stacy WAS Parker's love interest when he was in high school even in the original comic.

#1691674Post 9 of 9

Re:

I just watched this for the first time. Loved it! Absolutely blew way the other three. Which, wouldn't have been that difficult since they all sucked donkey balls & Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker was a abolute joke (w/o the laughter). Good plot, acting was decent, & the p.o.v. effects were kick-ass. Definitely give this one a watch & forget that they ever made that other garbage previously.

Log in to reply