[color=#ff0000][b]YOU BETCHA[/b][/color]
The minimum post count code is being put back into place...... only twist is, instead of the downloads page, the passwords page will be hidden until the minimum POST COUNT is achieved.....
:Bingo:
-e-
[ms] · Est. May 2002
One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.
[color=#ff0000][b]YOU BETCHA[/b][/color]
The minimum post count code is being put back into place...... only twist is, instead of the downloads page, the passwords page will be hidden until the minimum POST COUNT is achieved.....
:Bingo:
-e-
so we can pm each other ... ?
for you honey, anything...... :P
-e-
lol. k.
Good Call E. Keep the leechers away.
how many "where are the passwords!!!!!" threads will we see this week?
well its not in place yet...... but I doubt too many
-e-
o. i fucking love it. they all come out of the wood work. it's so great.
... i can not wait.
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
So what's the minimum post count, 50?
I havent installed it yet, we're still contemplating considering the rise in spam we might get...... but this mod is at the top of the list right now
-e-
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
When do you think that this will be put into place?
let's deal with spammers :P
New users: be cool, don't spam and the passwords will pop up quickly :)
do i have enough postS? how do i get p[aswrd? why cnat i rename my files? whaaaaat? :?
[quote=asdf_admin]o. i fucking love it. they all come out of the wood work. it's so great.
... i can not wait.[/quote]
Best dust off my flamethrower then. :lol:
[quote=peloquin]do i have enough postS? how do i get p[aswrd? why cnat i rename my files? whaaaaat? [/quote]
Ban him NOW, why wait! :Tongue:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=feather]So what's the minimum post count, 50?[/quote]
if it is 50, I would personally say that sucks! :evil:
~j0B
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=j0B]if it is 50, I would personally say that sucks! :evil:
~j0B[/quote]
why's that sporto? :P
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=j0B] if it is 50, I would personally say that tiddles sucks :evil:
~j0B[/quote] good call
^^^lol
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=j0B][quote=feather]So what's the minimum post count, 50?[/quote]
if it is 50, I would personally say that sucks! :evil:
~j0B[/quote]
are you saying 50 is too high?
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
IMO I think that an average of 1 to 2 posts a day is fair :?:
i think we should bring karma back :lol:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=Nigel Harkness]IMO I think that an average of 1 to 2 posts a day is fair :?:[/quote]
0.98 posts per day
you're fucked then :WinkNSmi:
j/k buddy
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=unome]
are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]
yes I am.
why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:
~j0B
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=peloquin][quote=Nigel Harkness]IMO I think that an average of 1 to 2 posts a day is fair :?:[/quote]
0.98 posts per day
you're fucked then :WinkNSmi:
j/k buddy[/quote]
Did you seriously have to do the math? :FuckOff: :WinkNSmi:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=j0B][quote=unome]
are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]
yes I am.
why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:
~j0B[/quote]
do you want to retain the opportunity to reach 50 posts? :evil:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=chemicalbeavis][quote=j0B][quote=unome]
are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]
yes I am.
why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:
~j0B[/quote]
do you want to retain the opportunity to reach 50 posts? :evil:[/quote]
Ban him Chem, Ban him. :lol:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=Nigel Harkness]Did you seriously have to do the math? :FuckOff: :WinkNSmi:[/quote]
if by, "do the math" you mean "click the button that says 'profile'" then yes, yes i did :mrgreen:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
I know I'm taking a bit of a risk here, but what about a grandfather clause?
Could the first 750 members get in already?
Either way, ain't no thang to me. I've only got a few more to go. I would just hate to miss some of the sweet special downloads that will (with my luck) appear and disappear before I reach 50.
Do what you will guys. I happen to think that earning dl ability is good. But the point of this post is that if you've been back up since the restart, then maybe that should say something.
Cheers, Alex
i think we should make the noobs go through an initiation sessions, animal house style, where they earn the right to download
thankyou sir, may i have another!
just my opinion :wink:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=chemicalbeavis][quote=j0B][quote=unome]
are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]
yes I am.
why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:
~j0B[/quote]
do you want to retain the opportunity to reach 50 posts? :evil:[/quote]
is it that you do not understand any criticism? or what do you mean by saying that?
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=peloquin][quote=Nigel Harkness]Did you seriously have to do the math? :FuckOff: :WinkNSmi:[/quote]
if by, "do the math" you mean "click the button that says 'profile'" then yes, yes i did :mrgreen:[/quote]
Touche.
I forgot about that feature
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
I don't think 50 is too high a count...
++1 :WinkNSmi:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
50 aint high at all.
There are plenty of good threads on here, it's hard not to comment or post your opinion.
when I started, there was no limitation... and I'm passed 50 now.
Just browse around and you'll start chating in no time.
[quote=asdf_admin]o. i fucking love it. they all come out of the wood work. it's so great.
... i can not wait.[/quote]
aint that the truth. :roll:
More double douchebags to come....
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
Bring back Karma, and the more karma the more letters of the password you can see :twisted:
I think I only ever downloaded 1 mix of the [ms] v.1 so i'll get out the bothered face on this one :)
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
I know it may be hard to program that (or not), but...is an average count not better than a minimum? That way those who are not posting like 10 times a day but a little less are still recognized as being active board members. Otherwise you might get people cramming the topics with posts just to get to their minimum, after which they might stop posting and start leeching again...
Just an idea.
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
[quote=Yao]I know it may be hard to program that (or not), but...is an average count not better than a minimum? That way those who are not posting like 10 times a day but a little less are still recognized as being active board members. Otherwise you might get people cramming the topics with posts just to get to their minimum, after which they might stop posting and start leeching again...
Just an idea.[/quote]
valid statement, will look into that one too
-e-
slsk is for downloads. ms is for PLUR. :LoveYou:
Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??
i think that 40 posts per day its the right :Bingo:
not even i have that many :? :wink: