HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / General Yakkity Yak

RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

102 durable postsStarted 2004-08-11Latest 2004-08-17
#2880Post 1 of 102

[color=#ff0000][b]YOU BETCHA[/b][/color]

The minimum post count code is being put back into place...... only twist is, instead of the downloads page, the passwords page will be hidden until the minimum POST COUNT is achieved.....

:Bingo:

-e-

#235307Post 2 of 102

so we can pm each other ... ?

#235308Post 3 of 102

for you honey, anything...... :P

-e-

#235310Post 4 of 102

lol. k.

#235316Post 5 of 102

Good Call E. Keep the leechers away.

#235328Post 6 of 102

how many "where are the passwords!!!!!" threads will we see this week?

#235332Post 7 of 102

well its not in place yet...... but I doubt too many

-e-

#235335Post 8 of 102

o. i fucking love it. they all come out of the wood work. it's so great.

... i can not wait.

#235346Post 9 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

So what's the minimum post count, 50?

#235357Post 10 of 102

I havent installed it yet, we're still contemplating considering the rise in spam we might get...... but this mod is at the top of the list right now

-e-

#235360Post 11 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

When do you think that this will be put into place?

#235367Post 12 of 102

let's deal with spammers :P

New users: be cool, don't spam and the passwords will pop up quickly :)

#235387Post 13 of 102

do i have enough postS? how do i get p[aswrd? why cnat i rename my files? whaaaaat? :?

#235472Post 14 of 102

[quote=asdf_admin]o. i fucking love it. they all come out of the wood work. it's so great.

... i can not wait.[/quote]

Best dust off my flamethrower then. :lol:

[quote=peloquin]do i have enough postS? how do i get p[aswrd? why cnat i rename my files? whaaaaat? [/quote]

Ban him NOW, why wait! :Tongue:

#235515Post 15 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=feather]So what's the minimum post count, 50?[/quote]

if it is 50, I would personally say that sucks! :evil:

~j0B

#235527Post 16 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=j0B]if it is 50, I would personally say that sucks! :evil:

~j0B[/quote]

why's that sporto? :P

#235529Post 17 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=j0B] if it is 50, I would personally say that tiddles sucks :evil:

~j0B[/quote] good call

#235531Post 18 of 102

^^^lol

#235534Post 19 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=j0B][quote=feather]So what's the minimum post count, 50?[/quote]

if it is 50, I would personally say that sucks! :evil:

~j0B[/quote]

are you saying 50 is too high?

#238166Post 20 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

IMO I think that an average of 1 to 2 posts a day is fair :?:

#238168Post 21 of 102

i think we should bring karma back :lol:

#238169Post 22 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=Nigel Harkness]IMO I think that an average of 1 to 2 posts a day is fair :?:[/quote]

0.98 posts per day

you're fucked then :WinkNSmi:

j/k buddy

#238174Post 23 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=unome]

are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]

yes I am.

why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:

~j0B

#238178Post 24 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=peloquin][quote=Nigel Harkness]IMO I think that an average of 1 to 2 posts a day is fair :?:[/quote]

0.98 posts per day

you're fucked then :WinkNSmi:

j/k buddy[/quote]

Did you seriously have to do the math? :FuckOff: :WinkNSmi:

#238182Post 25 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=j0B][quote=unome]

are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]

yes I am.

why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:

~j0B[/quote]

do you want to retain the opportunity to reach 50 posts? :evil:

#238187Post 26 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=chemicalbeavis][quote=j0B][quote=unome]

are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]

yes I am.

why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:

~j0B[/quote]

do you want to retain the opportunity to reach 50 posts? :evil:[/quote]

Ban him Chem, Ban him. :lol:

#238188Post 27 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=Nigel Harkness]Did you seriously have to do the math? :FuckOff: :WinkNSmi:[/quote]

if by, "do the math" you mean "click the button that says 'profile'" then yes, yes i did :mrgreen:

#238190Post 28 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

I know I'm taking a bit of a risk here, but what about a grandfather clause?

Could the first 750 members get in already?

Either way, ain't no thang to me. I've only got a few more to go. I would just hate to miss some of the sweet special downloads that will (with my luck) appear and disappear before I reach 50.

Do what you will guys. I happen to think that earning dl ability is good. But the point of this post is that if you've been back up since the restart, then maybe that should say something.

Cheers, Alex

#238195Post 29 of 102

i think we should make the noobs go through an initiation sessions, animal house style, where they earn the right to download

thankyou sir, may i have another!

just my opinion :wink:

#238220Post 30 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=chemicalbeavis][quote=j0B][quote=unome]

are you saying 50 is too high?[/quote]

yes I am.

why? because I have only 26 :Naughty:

~j0B[/quote]

do you want to retain the opportunity to reach 50 posts? :evil:[/quote]

is it that you do not understand any criticism? or what do you mean by saying that?

#238231Post 31 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=peloquin][quote=Nigel Harkness]Did you seriously have to do the math? :FuckOff: :WinkNSmi:[/quote]

if by, "do the math" you mean "click the button that says 'profile'" then yes, yes i did :mrgreen:[/quote]

Touche.

I forgot about that feature

#238236Post 32 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

I don't think 50 is too high a count...

++1 :WinkNSmi:

#238243Post 33 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

50 aint high at all.

There are plenty of good threads on here, it's hard not to comment or post your opinion.

when I started, there was no limitation... and I'm passed 50 now.

Just browse around and you'll start chating in no time.

#238245Post 34 of 102

[quote=asdf_admin]o. i fucking love it. they all come out of the wood work. it's so great.

... i can not wait.[/quote]

aint that the truth. :roll:

More double douchebags to come....

#238274Post 35 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

Bring back Karma, and the more karma the more letters of the password you can see :twisted:

I think I only ever downloaded 1 mix of the [ms] v.1 so i'll get out the bothered face on this one :)

#238279Post 36 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

I know it may be hard to program that (or not), but...is an average count not better than a minimum? That way those who are not posting like 10 times a day but a little less are still recognized as being active board members. Otherwise you might get people cramming the topics with posts just to get to their minimum, after which they might stop posting and start leeching again...

Just an idea.

#238281Post 37 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

[quote=Yao]I know it may be hard to program that (or not), but...is an average count not better than a minimum? That way those who are not posting like 10 times a day but a little less are still recognized as being active board members. Otherwise you might get people cramming the topics with posts just to get to their minimum, after which they might stop posting and start leeching again...

Just an idea.[/quote]

valid statement, will look into that one too

-e-

#238284Post 38 of 102

slsk is for downloads. ms is for PLUR. :LoveYou:

#238320Post 39 of 102

Re:: RETURN OF THE SPAMMERS ??

i think that 40 posts per day its the right :Bingo:

#238321Post 40 of 102

not even i have that many :? :wink:

Log in to reply