HorizonForumsone horizon
Log inSign up

[ms] · Est. May 2002

Music madethis place,we just kept itgoing...

One durable person. One social graph. Many communities—and every way people speak, share, listen, write, gather and remember.

Forums / General Yakkity Yak

god vs. god MMV

349 durable postsStarted 2005-10-21Latest 2007-05-09
#497289Post 41 of 349

Re: miketpoto

[QUOTE=miketpoto]As far as the r e s p e c t, could you do me a huge favor and see if you can find out what it means to me.[/QUOTE]

re?spect Audio pronunciation of "respect" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (r-spkt) tr.v. re?spect?ed, re?spect?ing, re?spects

  1. To feel or show deferential regard for; esteem.
  2. To avoid violation of or interference with: respect the speed limit.
  3. To relate or refer to; concern.

n.

  1. A feeling of appreciative, often deferential regard; esteem. See Synonyms at regard.
  2. The state of being regarded with honor or esteem.
  3. Willingness to show consideration or appreciation.
  4. respects Polite expressions of consideration or deference: pay one's respects.
  5. A particular aspect, feature, or detail: In many respects this is an important decision.
#497303Post 42 of 349

Re: miketpoto

[QUOTE=miketpoto] As far as the [FONT="Courier New"]r e s p e c t[/FONT], could you do me a huge favor and see if you can [FONT="Courier New"]find out what it means to me.[/FONT] take care TCB[/QUOTE]

I've got the definition for the word down-pat. In my previous post to the lovely and talented AsdfAdmin, I was quoting the Aretha Franklin Classic RESPECT written by Otis Redding.

#497332Post 43 of 349

Re: miketpoto

[QUOTE] 2. To avoid violation of or interference with: respect the speed limit.[/QUOTE]

this was my point. please respect.:D

#497410Post 44 of 349

Re: miketpoto

^ my post was on a sarcastic note. but thank you for the clarification.

#497412Post 45 of 349

Re: miketpoto

so was mine. i was talking about speeding. mike needs to slow down.

#497424Post 46 of 349

Re: miketpoto

I wrote this last night when my internet went down so now it is a little off subject, but I think I'll post it anyway:

I tend to avoid religious debates because I find it to be rather - shall we say, pointless? Neither side ever really budges.

However, out of respect for Mike, I will join this one:

So let’s see. I think you need to seriously respect the strength it requires to be an outwardly gay male such as Mike. A lot of this society does not understand homosexuality, particularly the religious / conservative part. Knowing that it will come with a consequence, to present the world with the person that you really are takes a lot of strength, and I give mike as well as his friends / my friends a lot of respect for this. The fact that our government does not give equal rights to someone who is gay, despite the fact that all humans are guaranteed equal rights in our constitution, is obviously going to upset a lot of individuals – I’m one of them. The fact that our government uses religion, for the most part, to justify this, is even more upsetting. I have no problem with personal faith of any kind, but when a social religion is used to gather the masses together so that they may team up on a minority, it is rather upsetting.

So let’s see. Our government / our society are influenced by the Bible, and by God. God is the holy creator of our world and of man, and the Bible his words. Well let’s see, the creator made all of us did he not? Did he not make Mike as well? Why did he make Mike gay? Our government, interpreting the Bible / religious faith, says that gays do not have equal rights – so why would god create someone who is not quite human? Either God or the government is at fault here.

So cowardly, you have studied the Bible, and you understand the word of God and what God stands for? Well you are mortal are you not? God is divine and immortal; you (and all of us) are neither immortal nor divine. So lets for a second ignore the fact that the Bible was not even written by god (it was written by immortal un-divine humans). You think, cowardly, that you as a mortal human can fully interpret the ideas of an immortal and holy being, that you can fully understand God’s wishes and thoughts and plans? Even if the divine and holy words of God were written in the Bible by the stroke of his pen (which they were not), how could you, as an immortal being truly understand what God meant? And to top it off you say you will teach us about the Bible and about God? You’re immortal, you’re a human, and you’re not a god. Even if God exists there is no way for you to truly understand him, and definitely no way for you to teach what he is.

See here’s the thing about communication. It has a degree of separation. If I speak a sentence to you – you have to interpret the sentence and assign an internal meaning to it. There is really no way that I can ever fully express my thought to you. So how is it that you fully understand what God is saying? Unless you are God, then the only way you are going to understand what God is saying is through interpretation, which takes anything holy and brings it down into the dirty world of mortals.

#497429Post 47 of 349

Re: miketpoto

^^^ your point will end very quickly if you understand that the "Christian" faith believes homosexuality is not a birth issue, but rather a life choice. It is in that choice they have issues with. "You are not born gay"

i frankly could care less where, who and what you fuck. i have had tons of gay friends and find them very fucking funny. they all want to be stand up comics. it is just another outlook on life, and there are plenty. i have decided what i like and what i want to do. i do not want to hear otherwise.

i would never post a picture of lynched n*gger. and have a quote "hanging tuff", i would expect others to have same resonable common sense.

yao you are very wrong in your words. for my understanding my above statement would be justified under you own words? is that not correct? :(

#497432Post 48 of 349

Re: miketpoto

cough gay gene cough

it has been found and proven same as left handed gene

#497433Post 49 of 349

Re: miketpoto

[quote=asdf_admin]i would never post a picture of lynched n*gger. and have a quote "hanging tuff", i would expect others to have same resonable common sense.[/quote]

pretty much sums up what I implied..... well put keyboard.... very very well put

#497434Post 50 of 349

Re: miketpoto

i am stating the facts what "they" believe .

there are always two sides bart. always. you just have to make a choice.

#497438Post 51 of 349

Re: miketpoto

-e- ... i was worried that was going to come over the wrong way. i actually thought that would be the best way to convey our point. r e s p e c t.

#497440Post 52 of 349

Re: miketpoto

yes, and empathy for something that means something to others. Even if it was printed on a T-Shirt doesnt mean

A) It was right B) Makes it any better if you relay it

How can you even show your belief in God let alone respect towards him by conveying that.... fuck I look at that and it still bugs me

#497443Post 53 of 349

Re: miketpoto

you are more in touch with the world and culture. i feel the same things -e-.

gplur. global peace love unity respect. :lol:

#497444Post 54 of 349

Re: miketpoto

I was going to type this out last night but i didn't want to go making a anti/pro religous thread out of this .This thread all started because CDJ likes to shout about his religion and also use it as a stick to beat others with . I make no appologies or explanations for my loathing of religion i have them but i ain't gonna use them . Howeva i have no problems what so eva with religous people we all gotta share this little planet so we gotta get try to get along. Relgion is a personal matter a private matter and and when it is kept as such i realy do think it is a good thing for it gives those people a good sense of well being and purpose .but i'll repeat [B][U]BUT [/U][/B]when someone shouts about it and brings it into debate like any subject matter it had better stand up to scrutinity for otherwise it will get torn to pieces and all flaws exposed . Just like mike has made a lifestyle choice about his sexuality [B]you[/B] have made a lifestyle choice in following your faith . If mike came on here everyday saying how each and everyone of us was inferior for liking boobs and that obviously all it would take is a higher I.Q. to see his side of the argument he would be shot down and ridiculed everyday .. he dosn't so we don't .

#497445Post 55 of 349

Re: miketpoto

no matter what all you have to say about CDJ and his beliefs, he doesn't ridicule anyone or make such a degradation of your beliefs, he just conveys his own in a fashion most people find unacceptable,

all in all, my point here is NOT about religion, or about your beliefs, its about conveying such a cheap meaning for something thats so damn important to the entire christian population on the planet.

You dont like CDJ's beliefs, fuck him for it, why go 2 steps beyond just to prove him wrong

#497447Post 56 of 349

Re: miketpoto

religion gets you through life E, humour gets me through the day . and good humour/bad humour is worth defending , i admit it was in poor taste i said that earlier howeva this t-shirt was aimed at the christian faith . turn the other cheek . lest you not judge or you will be judged ureself ect.ect. if your a true believer in that faith and follow those words then why get all arsey and not simply ignore it

#497448Post 57 of 349

Re: miketpoto

I dont follow what you are saying, are you trying to justify that the image has its place in humor ? you need humor, rent a video of "mind your language" mate, not chuckle at a naked jesus with a dumb ass tagline

#497449Post 58 of 349

Re: miketpoto

a fair few people did find it funny .. everyone has different opinions on what is funny and what is not . same as some have strong aversions to the use of such things to be put into the public domain . people have the right to say what they want so long as they are [B]not [/B]trying to incite hatred towards a group/minority . there have been numerous postings of fat people on the nonsense board . some large ppl could be hugely offended by such a thing . but ure not fat so u don't give a fuck and have a chuckle . we don't give a fuck about religion and have a chuckle . see how it all works now E

#497454Post 59 of 349

Re: miketpoto

I am not christian either bart, but you dont see me chuckling here mate.... there's a line you've gotta draw and know what is within the realms of fair humor and one that's crossing limits. If you read my earlier posts, I dont bash joking around, I'm one fucking clown short of a red nose, all I'm saying is you have to realize what limits are.... else we might as well be walking around naked dragging our women back to our caves by their hair.

Its the knowledge of being able to use our best judgements towards whats right and wrong that differentiates us from every other thing that walks with its back to the sun. Yes end of the day there's no right or wrong and its all human opinion, but only in mr. philosophers world bro.

#497457Post 60 of 349

Re: miketpoto

if i spoke like i do and aired the views the way i do on the net in the fleshy world i would constantly have two black eyes and would be missing most of my teeth. i spend my working life dancing round other peoples sensibilities. this was a religous jokes thread cowardly's jokes were in good taste mikes wasn't but my point is he had everyright to put it into this forum in my opinion. i know your a hindu and to be honnest out of all religions it is my favourite you seem to have more fun and occasions are big celebrations and there isn't all the dowdyness of other religions . also there is alot of humour in your coulture and an ability to laugh at yourselves . this has ment your coulture out of all those from the east has settled into the western world the best and of all major immigrant nations you are the least resented and most accepted . humour even near the knuckle stuff brings ppl together the ability to have a laugh is what seperates us " from every other thing that walks with its back to the sun " . arguments are forgotten when you can look back and laugh

#497462Post 61 of 349

Re: miketpoto

you're missing my point mate...... I never questioned his right to state / paste what he wanted to, if I felt his right was under any question, I would have deleted it myself. It's poor judgement that I'm talking about and keeping other feelings beliefs in mind when doing something like that, irrespective of where you are, be it reality or a message board.

#497466Post 62 of 349

Re: miketpoto

There has been sense in everything you have said E and i have agreed with %80 of it . My only real gripe with everyone who disagreed was that when it comes to matters such as these we all become hypocritical me included . We all have areas we consider out of bounds when it comes to critisism or telling jokes about but we all laugh at other stuff we shouldn't in fear of offending others. You either say it is all wrong or say it is all right but u can't expect everyone to conform to your ideas of acceptability or mine . I could of put that last bit better i know but the jist of what i'm saying is bite ure lip if it dosn't suite ure tastes or put the same rules on mocking anything that could be considered offensive to anyone

#497476Post 63 of 349

Re: miketpoto

how can you say its hypocritical when I can personally swear for not having mocked another religion's god and have not read anyone else's mockery (be it verbal or visual) on this forum, esp of those who have posted against the image...

its not even being negatively aggressive to the religion, its about shit smearing the god of that religion, that for me is low belted. Heck I think what the muslim extremists are lower than the lowest form of inhumanity you can conceive, but I still dont blame allah or paste a sickening image of him.

If you are even partly a religious person or fear god, you wouldn't even have the courage to post that (now I sound like CDJ) but shit I could never abuse someone's belief to that extent.

#497479Post 64 of 349

Re: miketpoto

beliefs faiths religion .. I and many like me don't have them , it is a touchy subject for you but not half the population. I can link up a few posts where you are ridiculing fat ppl if u like . And that is a vry serious subject for some it causes life threatening eating dissorders and clinical depression . But as i said before you seem to think that is okay because it is within your boundries of acceptable humour . Go show it some fat 10 y.o. girl who spends all her time in school getting bullied and called names because of her weight . Then maybe half this forum will start calling you EVIL . Step back and take perspective for fucks sake .

my previous post was a bit of an olive branch because i could see ure point of view . but ure obviously blinkered view on this subject has started to get me vexed

#497486Post 65 of 349

Re: miketpoto

Your arguement on me mocking Fat People and the hideous extent of Poto mocking God as being within the same realm is unreal mate. Seriously. It makes about as much sense as poto stating how beanz came after him on the forums and we asked him to move on, so now its ok to paste naked jesus in a post.

As for 10 year olds getting bullied - be it fat or with fucked up bug teeth (I had them) - is going to happen. Irrespective of where in the world you are. Its a part of growin up.

As for being vexed, seriously, if you cant see eye to eye, call it an even draw and end it, no sense bring up emotions in a debate bruva. Heck if my strong opinions on respecting God bother you as much, I'll call it even and make this my last post in this thread.

Peace.

#497492Post 66 of 349

Re: miketpoto

this is a case of just not seeing eye to eye . and i don't think whateva we say will change eachothers views . i think a draw is a fair result . and to be honnest the chats wev'e had in the past on simmilar things i don't want there to be a winner or looser in this. iv'e also exhausted my supply of rants so quitting while we are even would be a wise tactical move

#497506Post 67 of 349

Re: miketpoto

this is not a matter of winning or losing... i suggest to close this thread

#497508Post 68 of 349

Re: miketpoto

+1

#497516Post 69 of 349

Re: miketpoto

+2

#497517Post 70 of 349

Re: miketpoto

Having just returned from my afternoon stroll which included renewing my evil sinner membership card as well as picking up several impulse offensive items (just to have around in case I feel like desecrating someone's idol at the last minute, you know how it is), I had about 2 pages of catching up to do in this thread.

 I'll skip the bulk of the list of items I'd like to address and clarify/point-out/correct a key topic that wasn't accurately explained.  The following are screengrabs from a thread earlier this year, the one I referred to in an earlier post where I notified board admin and was told in response that I should just let it roll off my shoulders cause this guy is always saying kooky things like this... (I paraphrase but essentially that was as far involved that admin got as to any concern for personal respect/integrity)  I especially love the use in the fake quotes of one of E's favorites.......  "mom bashing"  !

[IMG]http://www.illcutyourface.com/media/pics/beanz1.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.illcutyourface.com/media/pics/beanz2.jpg[/IMG]

Comments anyone?

#497522Post 71 of 349

Re: miketpoto

I'm lost, when did all of this happen again ?

#497523Post 72 of 349

Re: miketpoto

mom bashing ?? I've lost u on that one poto, beanz is a non issue, honestly if you feel so offended about me being opnionated on naked jesus, have your glory mate, u right, me wrong, god sucks.... hope you can live in peace now

#497526Post 73 of 349

Re: miketpoto

take it to privmsgs boys. this is getting out of control. :what

#500480Post 74 of 349

Re: miketpoto

because we are not totalitarian ... this will continue.

please, please exercise your common sense and respect for others.

#500489Post 75 of 349

Re: miketpoto

I hope things like this do continue . Controversy creates discussion and discussion gives you a window into how others think .

We can't talk about digweed and tiesto all the time

#500498Post 76 of 349

Re: miketpoto

discussion is different from argueing and defensive insulting

#500500Post 77 of 349

Re: miketpoto

^^^ yep.

"play ball!"

#500511Post 78 of 349

Re: miketpoto

Me argue :NotMe:

mistaken identity .. you must be talking about someone else :D

#500539Post 79 of 349

Re: miketpoto

i believe things that should happen on this board are insults and offence pertaining to what you are born as. race, colour, sexuality. you shouldn't insult other people based on those things. and i mean personal offence.

the "jesus fucking christ" thing is hillarious and it's offensive on so many levels. primarily it is blasphemous. but i don't think it is worse than any other stuff that goes on here. taking the piss out of religion is risky, and christianity is a soft target, but you choose religion...you get to an age when you are an adult and you can choose. you can't choose your race, colour or sexuality.

sure mike went for CDJ's jugular - but there's obviously something going on between them.

beanz. i don't believe in special cases, but at the same time who said this was a democracy? beanz was so irreverant that if you got offended you were just showing your ignorance.

#500544Post 80 of 349

Re: miketpoto

[quote=picklemonkey]discussion is different from argueing and defensive insulting[/quote]

precisely. great pic, poto, couldn't stop laughing. funny as, ahem, sin. but i wouldn't have posted it for cowardlydj w/out a forewarned link or cut.

it's easy for non-religious people to throw jesus or god into cursing or profanity because we're not believers. it doesn't mean the same thing, no profundity. most non-religious people i know grew up christian, have the same knowledge base for christianity as church-goers, just don't believe. so it's easy to joke about it the same as with anything else.

what we tend to forget is that religious people often really believe in christ and god in their hearts. it's belief based on faith, and having it poked at will sting more deeply. or come across as a callous, personal hit below the belt to have that image marred. maybe the case here, maybe not. my 2 cents nonetheless...

i don't know. glad the thread's still going...

Log in to reply