[quote=Civic_Zen]Go to Anandtech and tomshardware and read the reviews about the architechture that already exists for the Prescott and the new chipsets that support DDR2 and PCI-E. They've already done benchmarks for this hardware [url=http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2088]here[/url]. and they are very disappointing.
[quote]"It was hard to resist being glib and titling this article, "Much Ado about Very Little". That feeling of disappointment comes from seeing so much new technology introduced all at once, and then finding out the real performance benefit is extremely small - if it exists at all. If Intel wants us to turn our computer world upside down, there should be a real tangible benefit to the bucks we are expected to spend. Unfortunately, that performance advantage is pretty hard to find - at least for now. There are certainly a few gems in the total package, but if you're looking for a big performance advantage it just isn't there." .[/quote]
All I'm saying is that you should never hold off on buying something because something better is around the corner. There will always be something better around the corner. If you want to wait, you'll be waiting forever and never buy anything. If you want to make a sound investment now, which will still be sound 6+ months from now, your only logical course is to go with AMD and the 64-bit processors. Even then your not going to be cutting edge becaus the 754 doesn't support DDR2 and PCIe which may have "actual" advantages in the future, but socket 939 is the future for AMD.
Sure you could get a Socket 925XE board now, with a Prescott and wait for something better to come along, but you will have to get one that supports both DDR and DDR2, and then you'll only have 2 dimm slots for both. You also have to buy a PCIe Video card now which means $500 and no performance gain over AGP 8x. AGP still hasn't reached its limit, we aren't even using all of its bandwidth. And your going to spend a lot more all around. Or you can spend a reasonable amount now, and just upgrade everything a year from now. In which case you'll probably end up spending the same amount for both machines, that you would to build this single machine now.
You should never hesitate to buy something, especially when the Motherboard is free, just because it will be obsolete soon. That is the way of the computer world.[/quote]
the article said exaclty what I was implying in my post above.... that given the CURRENT conditions of hardware available, there is not much difference between prescott and northwood but [i]given the potential that the Prescott architecture will display when processor speeds keep improving, there will be continued performance gains using prescott over northwood simply because of the way the prescott is built.[/i] [b][url]http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/02/02/intel_prescott_90nm_pentium/[/url][/b]
This topic is about the motherboard and what I said was instead of building a high end northwood, you're better off building a low-end prescott because in time, you can still run your motherboard into the ground but keep upgrading just supporting peripherals...
and your comments on PCI-E are whack..... PCI-E is downward compatible so even PCI based cards will run on them...... in fact, because technologies are progressing so fast..... hardware engineers bundle in more code to ensure it runs with the old cause not everyone is hunting for a beast of a mchine
-e-